Skip to main content

“Speculative Phase” of Archaeology

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology
  • 425 Accesses

Introduction

The “Speculative Phase” is so named due to the nature of speculation that was involved in archaeology before it was formed as an academic discipline and established professional practice and training. Archaeology was speculative in every way: financial, individual, exploratory, for publicity, and to aggrandize nationhood. (Unfortunately financial speculation has never left the practice of collecting antiquities.) Many of these factors continued beyond the “Speculative Phase” and played a part before it. This entry covers the move from the collection of antiquities to archaeological excavation during the nineteenth century and also considers how archaeology was sponsored as well as the role of the “explorer-archaeologist.” It argues that a shift to classificatory systems and detailed observation was informed by developments in the natural sciences. Further, it contends that “informal imperialism” in Europe and North America was crucial to the development of archaeology in...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 5,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bent, J.T. 1892. The ruined cities of Mashonaland. London: Spottiswoode.

    Google Scholar 

  • Challis, D. 2008. From the Harpy tomb to the wonders of Ephesus. British archaeologists in the Ottoman empire 18401880. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christenson, A.L. (ed.) 1989. Tracing archaeologys past: the historiography of archaeology. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Andreu, M. 2007. A world history of nineteenth-century archaeology. Nationalism, colonialism, and the past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, S.L. 2006. In pursuit of ancient pasts: a history of classical archaeology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Yale: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabian, A. 2010. The skull collectors: race, science and Americas unburied dead. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallo, L. 2009. Lord Elgin and ancient Greek architecture: the Elgin drawings at the British Museum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, L.P. 2009. The British consular service in the Aegean and the collection of antiquities for the British Museum. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, F. & N. Penny. 1981. Taste and the antique. The lure of classical sculpture 15001900. Yale: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoock, H. 2007. The British state and the Anglo-French wars over antiquities 1798 – 1858. The Historical Journal 50: 49-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illustrated London News. 1877. Our artist sketching the entrance gate of the Acropolis at Mycenae. 3 February 1877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehoe, A.B. & M.B. Emmerions. (ed.) 1999. Assembling the past. Studies in the professionalisation of archaeology. Albuqueque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuklick, H. 1991. Contested monuments. The politics of archaeology in Southern Africa, in G. Stocking Jr. (ed.) Colonial situations. Essays on the contextualisation of ethnographic knowledge. History of anthropology, Volume 7: 135-69. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, S.L. 1996. Down from Olympus. Archaeology and philhellenism in Germany 17501970. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, C.T. & R.P. Pullan. 1862. A history of discoveries at Halicarnassus, Cnidus and Branchidae. London: Day & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirke, S. 2010. Hidden hands. Egyptian workforces in Petrie excavation archives, 18801924. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertshaw, P. (ed.) 1990. A history of African archaeology. Oxford: James Currey Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schliemann, H. 1886. Troja. Results of the latest researches and discoveries on the site of Homer's Troy. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiebling, W.H. 1994. Uncovering the past. A history of archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocking, G.W. 1985. Victorian anthropology. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traill, D. 1995. Schliemann of Troy. Treasure and deceit. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B.G. 1989. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, C. 2009. Museums and the construction of disciplines of art and archaeology in nineteenth century Britain. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey, G.R. & J.A. Sabloff. 1993. A history of American archaeology London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debbie Challis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Challis, D. (2014). “Speculative Phase” of Archaeology. In: Smith, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_997

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_997

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0426-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0465-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics