Definition
Pragmatic reasoning schemas are linguistically based contextual schemas that have an underlying structure that is determined by people’s interpretations of classes of events. This structure determines the kinds of inferences that people make with different schemas corresponding to different logical patterns.
Theoretical Background
The notion of pragmatic reasoning schemas was first proposed by Cheng and Holyoak in 1985as a way of synthesizing research into the Wason selection task. This is a reasoning task proposed by Peter Wason in 1965 as a way of showing the difficulty many educated adults have in reasoning according to the rules of logic. The standard task presents people with a conditional rule, of the form “If there is a vowel on one side of the card, then there will be an even number on the other side”. They are then shown four cards which have (1) a vowel, (2) a consonant, (3) an even number,...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391–416.
Cheng, P. W., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Oliver, L. M. (1986). Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 293–328.
Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Cognition, 31, 187–276.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this entry
Cite this entry
Markovits, H. (2012). Pragmatic Reasoning Schemas. In: Seel, N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_656
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_656
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-1427-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-1428-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law