Skip to main content

Workflow Evolution

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Database Systems

Synonyms

Adaptive workflow/process management; Process evolution; Schema evolution in process management systems; Schema evolution in workflow management systems; Workflow/process instance changes

Definition

The term evolution has been originally used in biology and means the progressive development of a species over time, i.e., the adaptation to changing environmental requirements. Business processes (which are often called workflows when implemented and thus automated within a workflow management system) also “live” within an environment (e.g., the enterprise or the market). This environment is typically highly dynamic, and thus the running workflows have to adapt to these changing requirements – i.e., to evolve – in order to keep up with the ever-changing business environment and provide their users with the competitive edge.

Workflow evolution implies two basic challenges: change realization and change discovery. Change realization means that it must be technicallypossible to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Rinderle S, Reichert M, Dadam P. Correctness criteria for dynamic changes in workflow systems – a survey. Data Knowl Eng. 2004;50(1):9–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reichert M, Weber B. Enabling flexibility in process-aware information systems. Springer; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schonenberg H, Mans R, Russell N, Mulyar N, Aalst WMP. Process flexibility: a survey of contemporary approaches. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Enterprise Engineering I; 2008. p. 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heimann P, Joeris G, Krapp C, Westfechtel B. DYNAMITE: dynamic task nets for software process management. In: Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Software Engineering; 1996. p. 331–41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Müller R, Greiner U, Rahm E. AgentWork: a workflow system supporting rule-based workflow adaptation. Data Knowl Eng. 2004;51(2):223–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Adams M, ter Hofstede AHM, Edmond D, van der Aalst WMP. A service-oriented implementation of dynamic flexibility in workflows. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sadiq S, Sadiq W, Orlowska M. Pockets of flexibility in workflow specifications. In: Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling; 2001. p. 513–26.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reichert M, Dadam P. ADEPTflex – supporting dynamic changes of workflows with-out losing control. J Intell Inf Syst. 1998;10(2):93–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Casati F, Ceri S, Pernici B, Pozzi G. Workflow evolution. Data Knowl Eng. 1998;24(3):211–38.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Sadiq S, Marjanovic O, Orlowska M. Managing change and time in dynamic workflow processes. Int J Coop Inf Syst. 2000;9(1, 2):93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Aalst WMP. Exterminating the dynamic change bug: a concrete approach to support workflow change. Inf Syst Front. 2001;3(3):297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weske M. Formal foundation and conceptual design of dynamic adaptations in a workflow management system. In: Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference System Sciences; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weber B, Rinderle S, Reichert M. Change patterns and change support features–enhancing flexibility in process-aware information systems. Data Knowl Eng. 2008;66(3):438–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rinderle S, Reichert M, Dadam P. Disjoint and overlapping process changes: challenges, solutions, applications. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems; 2004. p. 101–20.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kochut K, Arnold J, Sheth A, Miller J, Kraemer E, Arpinar B, Cardoso J. IntelliGEN: a distributed workflow system for discovering protein-protein interactions. Distrib Parallel Database. 2003;13(1):43–72.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Ly LT, Rinderle S, Dadam P. Integration and verification of semantic constraints in adaptive process management systems. Data Knowl Eng. 2008;64(1):3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rinderle S, Weber B, Reichert M, Wild W. Integrating process learning and process evolution – a semantics based approach. In: International Conference Business Process Management; 2005. p. 252–67.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Dadam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Dadam, P., Rinderle-Ma, S. (2016). Workflow Evolution. In: Liu, L., Özsu, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7993-3_470-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7993-3_470-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7993-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics