Skip to main content

Just Negotiations, Stable Peace Agreements, and Durable Peace

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation
  • 122 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the role of justice in negotiations between rival groups and the durability of resulting peace agreements. It draws on information about group negotiation processes and agreements concluded to end civil wars in countries around the world. Relationships between the presence and importance of distributive justice (DJ) in the agreements, and their stability, are first explored. The difficulty of the conflict environment was shown to have the strongest impact upon stability. However, the DJ principle of equality was found to reduce the negative impact of difficult conflict environments on their stability. Next, the presence and importance of procedural justice (PJ) are examined in the negotiation processes that led to the signing of the peace agreements. Significantly more stable agreements occurred when a process based on PJ led to agreements emphasizing equality. Third, research on the impacts of DJ and PJ on long-term peace is reviewed. Peace is shown to emerge from a path that unfolds from micro-level negotiation to macro-level reconciliation and institutional change. The chapter continues with discussions of third-party roles in the peace process and the importance of trust and problem-solving processes. It concludes with a consideration of policy implications derived from the findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The statistical analyses consisted of performing regression-based double mediation following Hayes and Rockwood (2020).

References

  • Albin C (2001) Justice and fairness in international negotiation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Albin C (2008) Using negotiation to promote legitimacy: an assessment of proposals for reforming the WTO. Int Aff 84:757–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albin C, Druckman D (2012) Equality matters: negotiating an end to civil wars. J Confl Resolut 56:155–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balcells L, Justino P (2014) Bridging micro and macro approaches on civil wars and political violence: issues, challenges, and the way forward. J Confl Resolut 58:1343–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tel D (2008) Reconciliation as a foundation of culture of peace. In: de Rivera, J (ed) Handbook in Building Cultures of Peace. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockner J, Wisenfeld BM (1996) An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychol Bull 120:189–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidow J (1984) A peace in Southern Africa: the Lancaster House conference on Rhodesia, 1979. Westview Press, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschamps JC, Brown R (1983) Superordinate goals and intergroup conflict. British Journal of Social Psychology 22:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch M (1985) Distributive justice: a social–psychological perspective. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs G, Stedman SJ (2002) Evaluation issues in peace implementation. In: Stedman S, Rothchild D, Cousens E (eds) Ending civil wars: the implementation of peace agreements. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Druckman D, Albin C (2011) Distributive justice and the durability of peace agreements. Rev Int Stud 37:1137–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman D, Bonoma TV (1976) Determinants of bargaining behavior in a bilateral monopoly situation II: opponent’s concession rate and similarity. Behav Sci 21:252–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman D, Harris R (1990) Alternative models of responsiveness in international negotiation. J Confl Resolut 34:234–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman D, Wagner L (2016) Justice and negotiation. Annu Rev Psychol 67:387–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman D, Wagner L (2019) Justice matters: peace negotiations, stable agreements, and durable peace. J Confl Resolut 63:287–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortna VP (2004) Peace time: cease-fire agreements and the durability of peace. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartzell C, Hoddie M (2007) Crafting peace: power-sharing institutions and the negotiated settlement of civil wars. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AF, Rockwood NJ (2020) Conditional Process Analysis: Concepts, Computation, and Advances in the Modeling of the Contingencies of Mechanisms. Am Behav Sci 64: 19–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayner P (2007) Negotiating peace in Liberia: preserving the possibility for justice. Report. Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, International Center for Transitional Justice, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander-Blumoff R (2017) Formation of procedural justice judgments in legal negotiations. Group Decis Negot 26:19–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander-Blumoff R, Tyler TR (2008) Procedural justice in negotiation: procedural fairness, outcome acceptance, and integrative potential. Law Soc Inq 33:473–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume C (1994) Ending Mozambique’s war: the role of mediation and good offices. United States Institute of Peace Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Irmer C, Druckman D (2009) Explaining negotiation outcomes: process or context? Negot Confl Manag Res 2:209–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones BD (2001) Peacemaking in Rwanda: the dynamics of failure. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapstein EB (2008) Fairness considerations in world politics: lessons from international trade negotiations. Polit Sci Q 123:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konovsky M (2000) Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. J Manag 26:489–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebovitch LS, Coleman PT, Fisher J (2020) Approaches to understanding sustainable peace: qualitative causal loop diagrams and quantitative mathematical models. Am Behav Sci (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind EA, Tyler TR (1988) The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mikula G, Wenzel M (2000) Justice and social conflict. Int J Psychol 35:126–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morozzo della Rocca R (2003) Mozambique: achieving peace in Africa. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt DG, Carnevale PJ (1993) Negotiation in social conflict. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt DG, Lewis SA (1977) The psychology of integrative bargaining. In: Druckman D (ed) Negotiations: social–psychological perspectives. SAGE, Beverly Hills, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa H (1982) The art and science of negotiation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Raszelenberg P (1995) The Cambodia conflict: search for a settlement, 1979–1991: an analytical chronology. Institute of Asian Affairs, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector BI, Zartman IW (eds) (2003) Getting it done: postagreement negotiation and international regimes. United States Institute of Peace Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman SJ (2000) Spoiler problems in peace processes. In: Stern PC, Druckman D (eds) International conflict resolution after the cold war. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman S, Rothchild D, Cousens E (eds) (2002) Ending civil wars: the implementation of peace agreements. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut J, Walker L (1975) Procedural justice: a psychological analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler TR, Blader SL (2003) The group engagement model: procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 7:349–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulvila J (1990) Turning points: an analysis. In: McDonald JW Jr, Bendahmane DB (eds) U.S. bases overseas: negotiations with Spain, Greece, and the Philippines. Westview Press, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner LM (2008) Problem-solving and bargaining in international negotiations. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, NL

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner L, Druckman D (2012) The role of justice in historical negotiations. Negot Confl Manag Res 5:49–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner L, Druckman D (2017) Drivers of durable peace: the role of justice in negotiating civil war termination. Group Decis Negot 26:45–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young HP (1994) Equity. In: Theory and practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman IW (ed) (1995) Elusive peace: negotiating an end to civil wars. Brookings, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman IW, Druckman D, Jensen L, Pruitt DG, Young HP (1996) Negotiation as a search for justice. Int Negot 1:79–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Druckman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Druckman, D., Wagner, L. (2020). Just Negotiations, Stable Peace Agreements, and Durable Peace. In: Kilgour, D., Eden, C. (eds) Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12051-1_7-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12051-1_7-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12051-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12051-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics