Skip to main content

Fertility Control

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
  • 217 Accesses

Abstract

The entry opens with an overview of the history and characteristics of modern fertility control methods and comparative information on their effectiveness in preventing unwanted pregnancies. A discussion of their geographic prevalence in a global perspective follows, including information on barriers to access to contraception, particularly for vulnerable groups. The ethical aspects of the fertility control debate are discussed, with an analysis of the natural law theory as interpreted by opponents of contraception, and the three main pro-contraception moral arguments: self-determination, women’s health, and children’s rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alkema, L., Kantorova, V., Menozzi, C., & Biddlecom, A. (2013). National, regional, and global rates and trends in contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning between 1990 and 2015: A systematic and comprehensive analysis. Lancet, 381(9878), 1642–1652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (1965). Terms Used in Reference to the Fetus. Philadelphia: Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceva, E., & Moratti, S. (2013). Whose self-determination? Barriers to access to emergency hormonal contraception in Italy. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 23(2), 139–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra-Mouli, V., McCarraher, D. R., Phillips, S. J., Williamson, N. E., & Hainsworth, G. (2014). Contraception for adolescents in low and middle income countries: Needs, barriers, and access. Reproductive Health, 11(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, A. (2007). The Humble Little Condom: A History. Amherst: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehlendorf, C., Rodrigues, M. I., Levy, K., Borrero, S., & Steinauer, J. (2010). Disparities in family planning. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 202(3), 214–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, B. (2001). The New Handbook of Children’s Rights: Comparative Policy and Practice. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, J. (2012). A History of Birth Control Methods. New York: The Katharine Dexter McCormick Library and the Education Division of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noé, G., et al. (2010). Contraceptive efficacy of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel given before or after ovulation. Contraception, 81(5), 414–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1936). Our sexual ethics. The American Mercury, 149(38), 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanger-Hall, K. F., & Hall, D. W. (2011). Abstinence-only education and teen pregnancy rates: why we need comprehensive sex education in the U.S. PLoS ONE, 6(10), e24658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trussell, J. (2007). Contraceptive efficacy. In R. A. Hatcher, J. Trussell, & A. L. Nelson (Eds.), Contraceptive Technology: Twentieth Revised Edition (pp. 779–863). New York: Ardent Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNAIDS, Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (2004). Making condoms work for HIV prevention: UNAIDS best practice collection. Available at http://data.unaids.org/publications/irc-pub06/jc941-cuttingedge_en.pdf. Last opened 10 Nov 2014.

  • United Nations General Assembly (2006). In-depth study on all forms of violence against women. Document A/61/122/Add.1. Available at http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/61/122/Add.1. Last opened 10 Nov 2014.

  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2013). World Contraceptive Patterns 2013. Available at http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/family/contraceptive-wallchart-2013.shtml. Last opened 10 Nov 2014.

Further Readings

  • De Beauvoir, S. (1949). Le Deuxième Sexe. Paris: Gallimard. English edition: De Beauvoir, S. (2011) The Second Sex. New York/Toronto: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jütte, R. (2008). Contraception: A History. Cambridge, UK/Malden: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1929). Marriage and Morals. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlassoff, C. (2013). Women and contraception. In N. P. Stromquist (Ed.), Women in the Third World: An Encyclopedia of Contemporary Issues (pp. 185–193). New York/Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sofia Moratti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Moratti, S. (2015). Fertility Control. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_193-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_193-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics