Skip to main content

Moral Instincts and Morality

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Synonyms

Gut feelings; Moral intuitionist theory; Moral intuitions

Definition

Moral instincts, or otherwise social intuitions, are unconscious abilities that differentiate between right and wrong actions.

Introduction

Since the advent of psychology, Bargh (1989) stated that people access substantial types of knowledge without phenomenological cognizance. According to Reber (1993), awareness and phenomenological cognizance are comparatively new concepts in comparison to other functions of the brain considered to be unconscious. Lately, some scientific disciplines such as evolutionary psychology and cognitive sciences proposed intuitionist approaches to human functioning (Klein 2003).

Long ago, gut feelings were considered unreasonable. Now, however, things have changed significantly, and often reasoning is considered needless (Cummins 2003). Certain theories, like the moral intuitionist theories, emphasize people’s sudden instinct reactions that they exhibit toward others. As per this...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 3–51). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, D. (2003). The evolution of reasoning. In R. J. Sternberg & J. P. Leighton (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 338–374). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Moral intuition = fast and frugal heuristics? In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, Vol. 2. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 1–26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., Koller, S., & Dias, M. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. (2003). Intuition at work. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xenia Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Themistocleous, D., Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous, X. (2018). Moral Instincts and Morality. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3620-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3620-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics