Skip to main content

Accountability and Accounting: Insights from Russian Public Sector Reform

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance
  • 252 Accesses

Synonyms

Answerability; Blameworthiness; Bureaucratic control; Efficiency; Enforcement; Law-abiding; Legal compliance; Liability; Responsibility; Responsiveness; Transparency

Introduction

The past four decades or so have witnessed enormous efforts to modernize the public sector worldwide under the banner of New Public Management (NPM). A bewildering diversity of meanings regarding NPM and its effects has been expressed over time, including the viewing of it as a comprehensive package of ideas (Hood 1991), a label for the clusters of reforms, variations on a theme (Hood 1995), the leading tool box for healing all the managerial wounds, or “the cruellest invention of the human spirit” (Lapsley 2009). Despite the often spotty and sometimes even detrimental results (Hood and Dixon 2016; Hyndman and Lapsley 2016), today NPM has circled the earth by diverse paths, landed in various settings, and become entrenched in both theory and practice around the world.

One of the main pillars and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Almqvist R, Grossi G, Reichard C, van Helden J (2013) Public sector governance and accountability. Crit Perspect Account 24(7/8):479–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens M (2009) Public accountability. In: Lawrence L Jr, Pollitt C (eds) The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford Handbooks, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan JL (2003) Government accounting: an assessment of theory, purposes and standards. Public Money Manag 23(1):13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen T, Lægreid P (2011) Complexity and hybrid public administration – theoretical and empirical challenges. Public Organ Rev 11:407–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gårseth-Nesbakk L, Timoshenko K (2014) Ch. 9, the functions of accounting revisited – new meanings and directions. In: Bourmistrov A, Olson O (eds) Accounting, management control & institutional development. Cappelen Damm Akademisk, Oslo, pp 141–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1979) Central problems in social theory action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood C (1991) A public management for all seasons? Public Adm 69(1):3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood C (1995) The new public management in the 1980s: variations on a theme. Acc Organ Soc 20(2/3):287–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood C, Dixon R (2016) Not what it said on the tin? Reflections on three decades of UK public management reform. Financ Account Manag 32(4):409–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyndman N, Lapsley I (2016) New public management: the story continues. Financ Account Manag 32(4):385–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ijiri Y (1975) The theory of accounting measurement. American Accounting Association, Sarasota

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns KP (1994) The strategic management of accounting in non-profit organizations: an analytical perspective. Public Adm Rev 54(2):185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn EH (2012) New public management and governance: a comparison. Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 201–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppell JGS (2005) Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder”. Public Adm Rev 65(1):94–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurunmäki L (1999) Making an accounting entity: the case of the hospital in Finnish health care reforms. Eur Account Rev 8(2):219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapsley I (2009) New public management: the cruellest invention of the human spirit? Abacus 45:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindkvist L, Llewellyn S (2003) Accountability, responsibility and organization. Scand J Manag 19:251–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick RE, Tollison RD (1981) Politicians, legislation and the economy. An inquiry into the interest-group theory of government. Springer Verlag, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellemvik F, Monsen N, Olson O (1988) Functions of accounting – a discussion. Scand J Manag 4(3/4):101–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan R (2000) Accountability: an ever-expanding concept. Public Adm 78(3):555–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro R, Mouritsen J (1996) Accountability: power ethos and the technologies of managing. International Thompson Business Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Flynn J (2007) From new public management to public value: paradigmatic change and managerial implications. Aust J Public Adm 66(3):353–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne SP (2006) The new public governance? Public Manag Rev 8(3):377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panozzo F (2000) Management by decree. Paradoxes in the reform of the Italian public sector. Scand J Manag 16:357–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J (1991) The possibilities of accountability. Acc Organ Soc 16(4):355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J, Scapens R (1985) Accounting systems and systems of accountability – understanding accounting systems in their organizational contexts. Account Organ Soc 10(4):443–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson P (2003) Government accountability and performance measurement. Crit Perspect Account 14:171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romzek B (1998) Where the buck stops. In: Ingraham PW, Thompson JR, Sanders RP (eds) Transforming government lessons from the reinvention laboratories. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 193–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Romzek B, Dubnik MJ (1987) Accountability in the public sector: lessons from the challenger tragedy. Public Adm Rev 47(3):227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romzek B, Ingraham PW (2000) Cross pressures of accountability: initiative, command, and failure in the red brown plane crash. Public Adm Rev 60(3):240–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schedler A (1999) Conceptualizing accountability. In: Schedler A, Diamond L, Plattner M (eds) The self-restraining state: power and accountability in new democracies. Lynne Reinner, Boulder, pp 13–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair A (1995) The chameleon of accountability: forms and discourses. Account Organ Soc 20(2/3):219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterk SE (1988) The continuity of legislatures: of contracts and the contract clause. Columbia Law Rev 88:647–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timoshenko K (2008) Russian public sector reform: the impact on university accounting. J Bus Econ Manag 9(2):133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timoshenko K, Adhikari P (2009a) Exploring Russian central government accounting in its context. J Account Organ Chang 5(4):490–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timoshenko K, Adhikari P (2009b) Implementing public sector accounting reform in Russia: evidence from one university. In: Tsamenyi M, Uddin S (eds) Research in accounting in emerging economies, vol 9, Emarald Group Publishing Limited, UK, pp 169–192

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2000) Economic governance: guidelines for effective financial management. ST/ESA/PAD/SER.E/9, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantin Timoshenko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Timoshenko, K. (2018). Accountability and Accounting: Insights from Russian Public Sector Reform. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3416-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3416-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics