Synonyms
Equivalent forms; Parallel forms
Definition
Alternate test forms are designed to avoid or reduce content- or item-specific practice effects that are associated with repeated administrations of the same neuropsychological test(s) (Fastenau et al. 2002). Examination of the manuals for many intellectual and neuropsychological tests illustrates that practice effects are common, especially over brief retest intervals (e.g., days or weeks). Regarding test construction, alternate test forms should include the same number of items, and the items should be of equivalent difficulty. Moreover, the test instructions, time limits, examples, and format should be identical to the original instrument developed during standardization, to reduce measurement error (Jackson 2009). Of course, measurement error can never be eliminated. For example, content-sampling error and time-sampling error – inherent in all test-retest paradigms – are always concerns in developing alternate test forms...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References and Readings
Benedict, R. H. B. (2001). Brief visuospatial memory test – Revised. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Brandt, J., & Benedict, R. H. B. (2001). Hopkins verbal learning test-revised. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Busch, R. M., Chelune, G. J., & Suchy, Y. (2006). Using norms in neuropsychological assessment. In D. K. Attix & K. A. Welsh-Bohmer (Eds.), Geriatric neuropsychology: Assessment and intervention (pp. 133–157). New York: Guilford.
Dorans, N. J., & Holland, P. W. (2000). Population invariance and equitability of tests: Basic theory and the linear case. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37, 281–306.
Fastenau, P. S., Hankins, W. T., McGinnis, C. M., Moy, T., & Richard, M. (2002). Effects of alternate forms on retest effects in clinical testing. Journal of International Neuropsychological Society, 7(2), 151.
Jackson, S. L. (2009). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach (3rd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Ormea, D., Reeb, M. J., & Riouxc, P. (2001). Premorbid IQ estimates from a multiple aptitude test battery: Regression vs. equating. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 679–688.
Petersen, N. S. (2008). A discussion of population invariance of equating. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32, 98–101.
Petersen, N. S., Kolen, M. J., & Hoover, H. D. (1989). Scaling, norming, and equating. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 221–262). New York: Macmillan.
Salinsky, M. C., Storzbach, D., Dodrill, C. B., & Binder, L. M. (2001). Test-retest bias, reliability, and regression equations for neuropsychological measures repeated over a 12–16-week period. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7(5), 597–605.
Sattler, J. M. (2001). Assessment of children: Cognitive applications (4th ed.). San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler.
Stern, R. A., & White, T. (2003). Neuropsychological assessment battery. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M. S., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
White, T., & Stern, R. A. (2003). Neuropsychological assessment battery: Psychometric and technical manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). Wide range achievement test (4th ed.). Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Iverson, G.L., Ferguson, K.E. (2018). Alternate Test Forms. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1170
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1170
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57110-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57111-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences