Skip to main content

Bias

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • 21 Accesses

Synonyms

Partiality; Prejudice

Definition

Faust et al. (1991) and Wedding and Faust (1989) explain chief forms of bias related to clinical judgment and decision-making in neuropsychology. First, hindsight bias is the tendency to believe, after the outcome of an incident is determined, that the outcome could have been more reliably predicted than is actually true. This form of bias suggests that being aware of an event via a client’s clinical history may lead the clinician to conclude that they can determine the outcome of the event and make diagnostic determinations. Confirmation biasrefers to the tendency to seek confirming evidence while failing to consider disconfirming evidence when generating diagnostic impressions. Thus, a clinician seeks to confirm initial hypotheses while failing to gather information related to alternative hypotheses. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that clinicians tend to stop hypothesis evaluation once information in support of an initial hypothesis has...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

  • Faust, D., Ziskin, J., & Hiers Jr., J. B. (1991). Brain damage claims: Coping with neuropsychological evidence. Marina del Rey: Law & Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrabee, G. J. (2000). Forensic neuropsychological assessment. In R. D. Vanderploeg (Ed.), Clinicians guide to neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed., pp. 301–335). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, J. J., & Moulthrop, M. A. (1999). Self-examination questions as a means of identifying bias in adversarial assessments. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 1, 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gorp, W., & McMullen, W. (1997). Potential sources of bias in forensic neuropsychological evaluations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11, 180–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedding, D., & Faust, D. (1989). Clinical judgment and decision-making in neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 4, 233–265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert L. Heilbronner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Heilbronner, R.L. (2018). Bias. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_949

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics