Skip to main content

Seismic Fragility Analysis

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering

Synonyms

Damage probability matrix; Fragility curve; Fragility surface; Limit state; Numerical simulation; Seismic capacity; Seismic demand; Uncertainty

Introduction

Seismic fragility can be defined as the proneness of a structural component or a system to fail to perform satisfactorily under a predefined limit state when subjected to an extensive range of seismic action. In accordance with the above definition, seismic fragility analysis can be regarded as a probabilistic measure for seismic performance assessment of structural components or systems. There are two different end products of seismic fragility analysis: damage probability matrix and fragility curve.

Damage probability matrix (DPM) is a table that provides discrete values of damage state probabilities for specified levels of ground motion intensities. Each column of DPM stands for a constant level of ground motion intensity whereas each row of DPM denotes the probability of being in a predefined damage state. Hence, any...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Applied Technology Council (1985) Report ATC-13: earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Applied Technology Council, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Applied Technology Council (1996) Report ATC-40: seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City

    Google Scholar 

  • Erberik MA, Elnashai A (2004) Fragility analysis of flat-slab structures. Eng Struct 26:937–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (1997) NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA Publication 273. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman SA, Nicoletti JP, Tyrell JV (1975) Evaluations of existing buildings for seismic risk – a case study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington. In: Proceedings of the US National conference on earthquake engineering, Berkeley, pp 113–122

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay MD, Conover WJ, Beckman RJ (1979) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 221:239–245

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Metropolis N, Ulam S (1949) The Monte Carlo method. J Am Stat Assoc 44(247):335–341

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Building Sciences (1999) HAZUS technical manual. Prepared for Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossetto T, Elnashai A (2003) Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Eng Struct 25:1241–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Lee J, Naganuma T (2000) Statistical analysis of fragility curves. J Eng Mech 126(12):1224–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugurhan B, Askan A, Erberik MA (2011) A methodology for seismic loss estimation in urban regions based on ground-motion simulations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(2):710–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2002) Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct D 31(3):491–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Altug Erberik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Erberik, M.A. (2015). Seismic Fragility Analysis. In: Beer, M., Kougioumtzoglou, I., Patelli, E., Au, IK. (eds) Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_387-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_387-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36197-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics