Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computer-unterstützte kooperative Lernszenarien

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Lernen mit Bildungstechnologien

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Psychologie ((SRP))

Zusammenfassung

Computer-unterstütztes kooperatives Lernen (CSCL) bedeutet, dass mehrere Lernende gemeinsam Lernaufgaben bearbeiten und dabei von Computern unterstützt werden. Basierend auf Merkmalen von Lernaufgaben sowie verschiedenen technischen Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten wird hier ein Modell von CSCL-Szenarien vorgestellt. Das Modell ermöglicht es Wirkzusammenhänge von Unterstützungsmaßnahmen für CSCL-Szenarien einschätzen und überdauernde Gestaltungsmerkmale für CSCL-Szenarien entwickeln zu können.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Abrahamson, D. (2017). Embodiment and mathematics learning. In K. Peppler (Hrsg.), The SAGE encyclopedia of out-of-school learning (S. 247–252). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stepan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, N. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverley Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • August, S. E., Hammers, M. L., Murphy, D. B., Neyer, A., Gueye, P., & Thames, R. Q. (2016). Virtual engineering sciences learning lab: Giving STEM education a second life. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(1), 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. C. (2016). The crossroads of English language learners, task-based instruction, and 3D multi-user virtual learning in Second Life. Computers & Education, 102, 152–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D., Weinberger, A., Jucks, I., Spitulnik, M., & Wallace, R. (2003). Designing effective science inquiry in text-based computer supported collaborative learning environments. International Journal of Educational Policy, Research & Practice, 4(1), 55–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish, J. A., Enyedy, N., Saleh, A., Lee, C., & Andrade, A. (2015). Science through technology enhanced play: Designing to support reflection through play and embodiment. In O. Lindwall, P. Häkkinen, T. Koschman, P. Tchounikine & S. Ludvigsen (Hrsg.), Exploring the material conditions of learning: The computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) conference 2015 (Bd. 1, S. 332–339). Gothenburg: The International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (Hrsg.). (1999). What do you mean by „collaborative learning“? In Collaborative learning. Cognitive and computational approaches. Amsterdam/Boston: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., & Evans, M. (2011). Interactive tabletops in education. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 491–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2006). Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environments. Computers & Education, 47(3), 298–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Zottmann, J., & Weinberger, A. (2013). Collaboration scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan & A. M. O’Donnel (Hrsg.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (S. 403–419). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gijlers, H., Weinberger, A., van Dijk, A. M., Bollen, L., & van Joolingen, W. (2013). Collaborative drawing on a shared digital canvas in elementary science education: The effects of script and task awareness support. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(4), 427–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, I. Y. T., Yang, S. J. H., & Chu, C. J. (2015). The effects of collaborative models in second life on French learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(5), 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational success story. Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Vermeulen, M. (2013). Social aspects of CSCL environments: A research framework. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuders, T. (2015). Aufgaben in Forschung und Praxis. In R. Bruder, L. Hefendehl-Hebeker, B. Schmidt-Thieme & H.-G. Weigand (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Mathematikdidaktik (S. 435–460). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligorio, M. B., & Van der Meijden, H. (2008). Teacher guidelines for cross-national virtual communities in primary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(1), 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., Clark, D., & Slotta, J. D. (2003). WISE design for knowledge integration. Science Education, 87(4), 517–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mager, R. F. (1965). Lernziele und Programmierter Unterricht. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, U., Kleinknecht, M., Metz, K., & Bohl, T. (2010). Ein allgemeindidaktisches Kategoriensystem zur Analyse des kognitiven Potentials von Aufgaben. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 28, 84–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manlove, S., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2009). Trends and issues of regulative support use during inquiry learning: Patterns from three studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 795–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeown, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Jeong, H., Hartley, K., Faulkner, R., & Emmanuel, N. (2017). A meta-synthesis of CSCL literature in STEM education. In Proceedings 12th CSCL 2017 conference (S. 439–446). Philadelphia: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, A., Spada, H., & Rummel, N. (2007). A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9005-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercier, E. M., Higgins, S. E., & da Costa, L. (2014). Different leaders: Emergent organizational and intellectual leadership in children’s collaborative learning groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(4), 397–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, A., Otto, O., Pal, J., Singh, U. P., Kam, M., & Toyama, K. (2009). Reducing dominance in multiple-mouse learning activities. CSCL, 2009, 360–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentce-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., & Benoit, D. F. (2016). Promoting metacognitive regulation through collaborative problem solving on the web: When scripting does not work. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renkl (2007). Kooperatives Lernen. In W. Schneider & Hasselhorn (Hrsg.), Handbuch für Psychologie, Bd. Pädagogische Psychologie (S. 84–94). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick, J., Kopp, D., Schmitt, L., & Weinberger, A. (2015). Tarzan and Jane Share an iPad. In O. Lindwall, P. Häkkinen, T. Koschman, P. Tchounikine & S. Ludvigsen (Hrsg.), Exploring the material conditions of learning: The computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) conference 2015 (Bd. 1, S. 356–363). Gothenburg: The International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Hrsg.), Computer supported collaborative learning (S. 69–97). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., Rafanan, K., Bhanot, R., Estrella, G., Penuel, B., Nussbaum, M., & Claro, S. (2010). Scaffolding group explanation and feedback with handheld technology: Impact on students’ mathematics learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(4), 399–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneps, M. H., Ruel, J., Sonnert, G., Dussault, M., Griffin, M., & Sadler, P. M. (2014). Conceptualizing astronomical scale: Virtual simulations on handheld tablet computers reverse misconceptions. Computers & Education, 70, 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2006). Supporting group cognition in an online math community: A cognitive tool for small-group referencing in text chat. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(2), 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Hrsg.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (S. 409–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, D., Neale, H., & Bayon, V. (2002). Interfaces to support children’s co-present collaboration: multiple mice and tangible technologies. In G. Stahl (Hrsg.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (S. 583–584). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szewkis, E., Nussbaum, M., Rosen, T., Abalos, J., Denardin, F., Caballero, D. & Alcoholado, C. et al. (2011). Collaboration within large groups in the classroom. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 561–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teasley, S. D. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration. In L. B. Resnick, R. Säliö, C. Pontevorvo & B. Burge (Hrsg.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning. Essays on situated cognition (S. 361–384). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K. J. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. The international Journal of Higher Education, 32(3), 321–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. M. (2002). „Mapping to know“: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86(2), 264–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsovaltzi, D., Judele, R., Puhl, T., & Weinberger, A. (2015). Scripts, individual preparation and group awareness support in the service of learning in Facebook: How does CSCL compare to social networking sites? Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 577–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bruggen, J. M., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Drie, J., Van Boxtel, C., Jaspers, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Effects of representational guidance on domain specific reasoning in CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 575–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Joolingen, W. R., De Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Savelsbergh, E. R., & Manlove, S. (2005). Co-Lab: Research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 671–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Designing automated adaptive support to improve student helping behaviors in a peer tutoring activity. International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, 6(2), 279–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9111-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. W. (2013). Information processing approaches to collaborative learning. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan & A. M. O’Donnel (Hrsg.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (S. 19–40). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A. (2017). Orchestrierungsmodelle und -szenarien technologie-unterstützten Lernens. In S. Ladel, J. Knopf & A. Weinberger (Hrsg.), Digitalisierung und Bildung (S. 117–139). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., & Mandl, H. (2003). Computer-mediated knowledge communication. Studies in Communication Sciences, 3(3), 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Deutschland

    Armin Weinberger & Lara Johanna Schmitt

  2. Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland

    Christian Hartmann & Nikol Rummel

Authors
  1. Armin Weinberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christian Hartmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lara Johanna Schmitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nikol Rummel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armin Weinberger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany

    Helmut Niegemann

  2. Lehrstuhl für Bildungstechnologie, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany

    Armin Weinberger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Weinberger, A., Hartmann, C., Schmitt, L.J., Rummel, N. (2018). Computer-unterstützte kooperative Lernszenarien. In: Niegemann, H., Weinberger, A. (eds) Lernen mit Bildungstechnologien. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_20-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_20-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54373-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54373-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Psychologie

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation