Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation multimedialen Lernens

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Lernen mit Bildungstechnologien

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Psychologie ((SRP))

  • 1930 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Evaluation ist die Bewertung multimedialen Lernens anhand unterschiedlicher Kriterien zur (Weiter-) Entwicklung der eingesetzten Bildungstechnologien und/oder mediendidaktischen Konzepte. Dominierte in den ersten Jahren die Usability-Forschung zur Erstellung benutzerfreundlicher Technologien, so sind neuerdings verstärkt komplexe Monitoring- und Evaluationssysteme zur Unterstützung der Implementation und Steuerung des Lernprozesses entstanden. Der Beitrag gibt einen kurzen Überblick zum gegenwärtigen Stand der Forschung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Arnold, A., Fischer, F., Franke, U., Nistor, N., & Schultz-Pernice, F. (2013). Mediendidaktische Basisqualifikation für alle angehenden Lehrkräfte: Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Pilottrainings. In C. Bremer & D. Krömker (Hrsg.), E-learning zwischen Vision und Alltag. Zum Stand der Dinge (S. 148–158). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, M., Rao, V., & Woolcock, M. (2010). Using mixed methods in monitoring and evaluation – Experiences from international development. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Hrsg.), SAGE handbook on mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2. Aufl., S. 613–642). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipped learning. Gateway to student engagement. Arlington: International Society for Technology in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A Survey of the Research. In Proceedings of the 120th ASEE annual conference & exposition „Frankly we do give a damn“ 23–26 June 2013, Atlanta, vol 30(9), Paper ID #6219. Atlanta: ASEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, E., & Liu, J. (2012). Applying multimedia technology to the teaching and learning of college english in China: Problems and solutions. Journal of Information Technology and Application in Education, 1(3), 108–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. S., & Yao, A. T. Y. (2016). An empirical evaluation of critical factors influencing learner satisfaction in blended learning: A pilot study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 1667–1671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dziuban, C. D. (2016a). Assessing outcomes and blended learning research. In C. D. Dziuban, A. G. Picciano, C. R. Graham & P. Moskal (Hrsg.), Conducting research in outline and blended learning environments. New pedagogical frontiers (S. 158–172). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dziuban, C. D. (2016b). Big data in online and blended learning research. In C. D. Dziuban, A. G. Picciano, C. R. Graham & P. Moskala (Hrsg.), Conducting research in outline and blended learning environments. New pedagogical frontiers (S. 143–157). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraslan, E., İç, Y. T., & Yurdakul, M. (2016). A new usability evaluation approach for touch screen mobile devices. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 10(2–4), 186–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay-Thompson, S., & Mombourquette, P. (2014). Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadzhikoleva, S., Hadzhikolev, E., Totkov, G., & Doneva, R. (2010). About electronic assessment, Accreditation and management of the quality of teaching in higher education. Anniversary International Conference REMIA, 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, J. G., & Reeves, T. C. (2015). E-learning evaluation. In B. H. Khan & M. Ally (Hrsg.), International handbook of e-learning (Theoretical perspectives and research, Bd. 1, S. 279–294). New York/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegner, M. (2003). Methoden der Evaluation von Software. IZ- Arbeitsbericht. Informationszentrum Sozialwissenschaften der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Sozialwissenschaftlicher Institute e.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jethro, O. O., Grace, A. M., & Thomas, A. K. (2012). E-learning and its effects on teaching and learning in a global age. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(1), 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannessen, G. J. H., & Hornbæk, K. (2014). Must evaluation methods be about usability? Devising and assessing the utility inspection method. Journal Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(2), 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keengwe, J., & Onchwari, G. (Hrsg.). (2016). Handbook of research on active learning and the flipped classroom model in the digital age. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Oigara, J. (Hrsg.). (2014). Promoting active learning through the flipped classroom model. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, G. (2010). Evaluation von Bedienoberflächen für e-Learning Applikationen. In H. O. Mayer & W. Kriz (Hrsg.), Evaluation von eLernprozessen. Theorie und Praxis (S. 201–220). Oldenbourg: München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerres, M. (2013). Mediendidaktik. Konzeption und Entwicklung mediengestützter Lernangebote (4. Aufl.). München: Oldenbourg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuckartz, U. (2014). Mixed methods. Methodologie, Forschungsdesigns und Analyseverfahren. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpu, M., Atkins, S., Zwarenstein, M., & Nkonki, L. (2016). A partial economic evaluation of blended learning in teaching health research methods: a three-university collaboration in South Africa, Sweden, and Uganda. Global Health Action, 9. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v9.30448.

  • Manny-Ikan, E., Dagan, O., Berger-Tikochinski, T., & Zorman, R. (2011). Using the interactive white board in teaching and learning – An evaluation of the SMART CLASSROOM pilot project. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7(1), 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, H. O., & Kriz, W. (2010). Evaluation von eLernprozessen. Theorie und Praxis. München: Oldenbourg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 117–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriz, W. (2008). Blended-learning. Entwicklung, Gestaltung, Betreuung und Evaluation von E-Learningunterstütztem Unterricht. Norderstedt: Books on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskal, P. D. (2016). Longitudinal evaluation in online and blended learning. In C. D. Dziuban, A. G. Picciano, C. R. Graham & P. Moskal (Hrsg.), Conducting research in outline and blended learning environments. New pedagogical frontiers (S. 127–142). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskal, P., Dziubana, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning. A dangerous idea? The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niegemann, H. M. (2001). Neue Lernmedien. Bern/Göttingen: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orfanou, K., Tsellos, N., & Katsanos, C. (2015). Perceived usability evaluation of learning management systems: Empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2), 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ossiannilsson, E. (2010). Benchmarking eLearning in higher education. Findings from EADTU’s E-xcellence+project and ESMU’s benchmarking exercise in eLearning. In M. Soinila & M. Stalter (Hrsg.), Quality assurance of e-learning (Bd. Report 14, S. 32–44). Helsinki: ENQA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oztekin, A., Delen, D., Turkyilmaz, A., & Zaim, S. (2013). A machine learning-based usability evaluation method for eLearning systems. Decision Support Systems, 56, 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanis, E. (2013). Traditional teaching versus e-learning. Mytilene: University of the Aegean.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pape-Koehler, C., Immenroth, M., Sauerland, S., Lefering, R., Lindlohr, C., Toaspern, J., & Heiss, M. (2013). Multimedia-based training on Internet platforms improves surgical performance: a randomized controlled trial. Surgical Endoscopy, 27, 1737–1747.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Picciano, A. G., Dziuban, C. D., & Graham, C. R. (Hrsg.). (2014). Blended learning. Research perspectives (Bd. 2). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold, A. (2015). Das Experteninterview als zentrale Methode der Wissensmodellierung in den Digital Humanities. Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis, 66(5–6), 327–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Bilella, P., Marinic Valencia, S., Alvarez, L. S., Klier, S. D., Hernández, A. L. G., & Tapella, E. (2016). Evaluation standards for Latin America and the Caribbean. Buenos Aires: ReLAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarodnik, F., & Brau, H. (2016). Methoden der Usability Evaluation: Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung (3. Aufl.). Bern: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheg, A. G. (Hrsg.). (2015). Implementation and critical Assessment of the flipped classroom experience. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sindler, A., Bremer, C., Dittler, U., Hennecke, P., Sengstag, C., & Wedekind, J. (Hrsg.). (2006). Qualitätssicherung im E-Learning. Waxmann: Münster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockmann, R., & Meyer, W. (2014). Evaluation. Eine Einführung (2. Aufl.). Opladen/Toronto: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surjono, H. D. (2014). The evaluation of a moodle based adaptive e-learning system. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(1), 89–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Süss, D., Lampert, C., & Wijnen, C. W. (2013). Medienpädagogik. Ein Studienbuch zur Einführung (2. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. A., & Newton, D. (2013). Beyond blended learning: A case study of institutional change at an Australian regional university. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 34–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tergan, S. O. (2001). Ansätze zur Evaluation der Qualität von Lernsoftware. Personalführung, 2, 50–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tergan, S. O., & Schenkel, P. (Hrsg.). (2004). Was macht E-Learning erfolgreich? Grundlagen und Instrumente der Qualitätsbeurteilung. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoms, B., & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). How media choice affects learner interactions in distance learning classes. Computers & Education, 75, 112–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2015). Video-based learning: A critical analysis of the research published in 2003–2013 and future visions. eLmL 2014 In The sixth international conference on mobile, hybrid, and on-line learning, 112–119.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CEval Centrum für Evaluation, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Deutschland

    Wolfgang Meyer & Reinhard Stockmann

Authors
  1. Wolfgang Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Reinhard Stockmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Meyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany

    Helmut Niegemann

  2. Lehrstuhl für Bildungstechnologie, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany

    Armin Weinberger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Meyer, W., Stockmann, R. (2018). Evaluation multimedialen Lernens. In: Niegemann, H., Weinberger, A. (eds) Lernen mit Bildungstechnologien. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_43-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_43-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54373-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54373-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Psychologie

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation