Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Connectivity of Wetlands

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Wetland Book

  • 411 Accesses

Abstract

Connectivity implies connection or movement of resources across the landscape. Wetlands are dynamic ecosystems imbedded within or at the edges of larger systems and thus wetlands are natural “connectors” between upland and aquatic systems. Although many ecological processes have been used to describe wetland connectivity, here the focus is the movement of water and animals within and among wetlands as these are known agents of connectivity. Prior to these examples, a brief discussion of how connectivity has been used in the legal protection of wetlands demonstrates why connectivity is important to the conservation of wetlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amezaga JM, Santamaría L, Green AJ. Biotic wetland connectivity – supporting a new approach for wetland policy. Acta Oecola. 2002;23:213–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquiloni L, Ilhéu M, Gherardi F. Habitat use and dispersal of the invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii in ephemeral water bodies of Portugal. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol. 2005;38:225–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baguette M, Van Dyck H. Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal. Landsc Ecol. 2007;22:1117–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin RF, Calhoun AJK, deMaynadier PG. Conservation planning for amphibian species with complex habitat requirements: a case study using movements and habitat selection of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). J Herpetol. 2006;40:442–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinson MM. Changes in the functioning of wetlands along environmental gradients. Wetlands. 1993;13:65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn SE, Arthington AH. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manag. 2002;30:492–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll C, McRae BH, Brookes A. Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in western North America. Conserv Biol. 2012;26:78–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charney ND. Evaluating expert opinion and spatial scale in an amphibian model. Ecol Model. 2012;242:37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton BW, McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Gamble LR. A resistant-kernel model of connectivity for amphibians that breed in vernal pools. Conserv Biol. 2007;21:788–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cosentino BJ, Schooley RL, Phillips CA. Connectivity of agroecosystems: dispersal costs can vary among crops. Landsc Ecol. 2011;26:371–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis DL, Mooij WM. Individual-based modeling of ecological and evolutionary processes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2005;36:147–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing DM, Winer C, Wood LD. Navigating through clean water act jurisdiction: a legal review. Wetlands. 2003;23:475–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigenbroda F, Stephen SJ, Hecnarb J, Fahrig L. The relative effects of road traffic and forest cover on anuran populations. Biol Conserv. 2008;141:35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euliss NH, LaBaugh JW, Fredrickson LH, Mushet DM, Laubhan MK, Swanson GA, Winter TC, Rosenberry DO, Nelson RD. The wetland continuum: a conceptual framework for interpreting biological studies. Wetlands. 2004;24:448–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2007;16:265–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furukawa K, Wolanski E, Mueller H. Currents and sediment transport in mangrove forests. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 1997;44:301–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gagne SA, Fahrig L. Effect of landscape contect on anuran communitites in breeding ponds in the National Capital Regions, Canada. Landsc Ecol. 2007;22:205–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble LR, McGarigal K, Compton BW. Fidelity and dispersal in the pond-breeding amphibian, Ambystoma opacum: implications for spatio-temporal population dynamics and conservation. Biol Conserv. 2007;139:247–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs JP, Shriver WG. Can road mortality limit populations of pool-breeding amphibians? Wetl Ecol Manag. 2005;13:281–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig SM, Mehlman DW, Oring LW. Avian movements and wetland connectivity in landscape conservation. Conserv Biol. 1998;12:749–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer AJ, McDonnell MJ. Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanising world: a review. Biol Conserv. 2008;141:2432–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper EB, Rittenhouse TAG, Semlitsch RD. Demographic consequences of terrestrial habitat loss for pool-breeding amphibians: predicting extinction risks associated with inadequate size of buffer zones. Conserv Biol. 2008;22:1205–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson ML, Gaines MS. Evolution of dispersal: theoretical models and empirical tests using birds and mammals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1990;21:449–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson WC, Werner B, Guntenspergen GR, Voldseth RA, Millett B, Naugle DE, Tulbure M, Carroll RWH, Tracy J, Olawsky C. Prairie wetland complexes as landscape functional units in a changing climate. BioScience. 2010;60:128–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan D, Munoz-Carpena R, Wan Y, Hedgepeth M, Zheng F, Roberts R, Rossmanith R. Linking river, floodplain, and vadose zone hydrology to improve restoration of a coastal river affected by saltwater intrusion. J Environ Qual. 2010;39:1570–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kusler J. The SWANCC decision and state regulation of wetlands. Association of State Wetland Managers. 2001. http://www.aswm.org/pdf_lib/swancc_and_state_regulation_060101.pdf

  • Lafleur PM, Hember RA, Admiral SW, Roulet NT. Annual and seasonal variability in evapotranspiration and water table at a shrub-covered bog in southern Ontario, Canada. Hydrol Process. 2005;19:3533–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh DM, Trenham PC. Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Conserv Biol. 2001;15:40–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRae BH. Isolation by resistance. Evolution. 2006;60:1551–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menon NN, Balchand AN, Menon NR. Hydrobiology of the Cochin backwater system – a review. Hydrobiologia. 2000;430:149–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock C. Rivers, floodplains and wetlands: connectivity and dynamics. 2003. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson A, Richgels KD, Johnson PJ, McKenzie V. Investigating the dispersal routes used by an invasive amphibian, Lithobates catesbeianus, in human-dominated landscapes. Biol Invasions. 2013;15:2179–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittenhouse TAG, Semlitsch RD. Grasslands as movement barriers for a forest-associated salamander: migration behavior of adult and juvenile salamanders at a distinct habitat edge. Biol Conserv. 2006;131:14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittenhouse TAG, Semlitsch RD. Distribution of amphibians in terrestrial habitat surrounding wetlands. Wetlands. 2007;27:153–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe JH, Brinton AC, Georges AG. Temporal and spatial variation in landscape connectivity for a freshwater turtle in a temporally dynamic wetland system. Ecol Appl. 2009;19:1288–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roelke DL, Spatharis S, Mitrovic SM. A new hydrology: effects on ecosystem form and functioning. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2012;69:1377–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safner T, Miaud C, Gaggiotti O, Decout S, Rioux D, Zundel SP, Manuel SP. Combining demography and genetic analysis to assess the population structure of an amphibian in a human-dominated landscape. Conserv Genet. 2011;12:161–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer SC, Epps CW, Brashares JS. Placing linkages among fragmented habitats: do least-cost models reflect how animals use landscapes? J Appl Ecol. 2011;48:668–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt PR. DU comments on clean water draft guidance. Ducks unlimited. 2011. http://www.ducks.org/resources/media/Conservation/Clean%20Water/CWA_GuidanceComments_DU_EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0409.pdf

  • Semlitsch RD. Differentiating migration and dispersal processes for pond-breeding amphibians. J Wildl Manag. 2008;72:260–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR. Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conserv Biol. 2003;17:1219–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD, Jensen JB. Core habitat, not buffer zone. Nat Wetl Newsl. 2001;23:5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storfer A, Murphy MA, Evans JS, Goldberg CS, Robinson S, Spear SF, Dezzani R, Delmelle E, Vierling L, Waits LP. Putting the “landscape” in landscape genetics. Heredity. 2007;98:128–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos. 1993;68:571–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiner RW. Geographically isolated wetlands of the United States. Wetlands. 2003;23:494–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward JV, Tockner K, Schiemer F. Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regul Rivers Res Manage. 1999;15:125–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright CK. Spatiotemporal dynamics of prairie wetland networks: power-law scaling and implications for conservation planning. Ecology. 2010;91:1924–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zedler JB, Kercher S. Causes and consequences of invasive plants in wetlands: opportunities, opportunists, and outcomes. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2004;23:431–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller K, McGarigal K, Whiteley A. Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landsc Ecol. 2012;27:777–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Connecticut, 1376 Storrs Rd., Unit 4087, 06269-4087, Storrs, CT, USA

    Tracy A. G. Rittenhouse

  2. School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    William E. Peterman

Authors
  1. Tracy A. G. Rittenhouse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William E. Peterman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tracy A. G. Rittenhouse or William E. Peterman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, Australia

    C. Max Finlayson

  2. International Water Security Network, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK

    Mark Everard

  3. UNESCO-IHE, Institute for Water Education, Delft, The Netherlands

    Kenneth Irvine

  4. RM Wetlands and Environment Ltd., Littleworth, Oxfordshire, UK

    Robert J. McInnes

  5. U.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Lafayette, LA, USA

    Beth A. Middleton

  6. Aquatic Ecosystems Group, Department of Water Science and Engineering, UNESCO-IHE, Institute for Water Education, Delft, The Netherlands

    Anne A. van Dam

  7. Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, Australia

    Nick C. Davidson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Rittenhouse, T.A., Peterman, W.E. (2018). Connectivity of Wetlands. In: Finlayson, C.M., et al. The Wetland Book. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9659-3_54

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation