Skip to main content

Synonyms

JDI; Job satisfaction

Definition

The Job Descriptive Index (JDI) is a 72-item instrument designed to measure five dimensions of job satisfaction: satisfaction with supervision, coworkers, pay, promotional opportunities, and the work itself.

Description

The Job Descriptive Index (JDI) was originally developed by Smith, Kendall, and Hulin (1969) to measure job satisfaction defined as “the feelings a worker has about his job” (p. 100). This instrument has been revised in 1985, 1997, and most recently in 2009.

Specifically, JDI measures five facets of job-related satisfaction: work itself, supervision, pay, promotions, and coworkers. Each scale includes a checklist of adjectives or adjective phrases, and respondents are asked to fill the blank beside each item as follows: “Y” (agreement), “N” (disagreement), and “?” (cannot decide). The original item pool was generated by means of extensive interviews with employees, content analyses of existing instruments, and content analyses...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 9,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Buckley, M. R., Carraher, S. M., & Cote, J. A. (1992). Measurement issues concerning the use of inventories of job satisfaction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(3), 529–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drasgow, F., & Kanfer, R. (1985). Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(4), 662–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, M., Drasgow, F., & Probst, T. (2000). Does computerizing paper-and-pencil job attitude scales make a difference? New IRT analyses offer insight. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 305–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. M., Smith, P. C., & Tucker, S. M. (1982). Response format of the JDI: Assessment of reliability and validity by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 500–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, K., Dalessio, A., & Johnson, S. (1986). Stability of the factor structure of the job descriptive index. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 609–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, J. (1991). The effects of computer administration and identification on the job descriptive index (JDI). Journal of Business and Psychology, 5(3), 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinicki, A., Mckee-Ryan, F., Schriesheim, C., & Carson, K. (2002). Assessing the construct validity of the job descriptive index: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 14–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roznowski, M. (1989). Examination of the measurement properties of the job descriptive index with experimental items. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 805–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. C., Kendall, L., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement: A strategy for the study of attitudes. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, S. J. (1981). Dimensionality of the JDI. American Management Journal, 24(1), 205–212.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filipa Castanheira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Castanheira, F. (2014). Job Descriptive Index. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1565

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1565

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0752-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0753-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics