Definition
Just-world theory (Lerner, 1980) proposed that people have a fundamental need to believe that the world is a just place. According to the theory, people have therefore developed several strategies to cope with unjust events, ranging from helping to blaming victims of injustice. Subsequent research has identified additional ways in which people can cope with an unjust world (e.g., compensatory rationalizations and immanent justice reasoning).
Description
Belief in a Just World
Justiceis one of people’s and society’s core values. People generally strive to do the right thing and greatly value being treated fairly. Moreover, rules of justice are pivotal to the functioning of most, if not all, societies. Yet, people are confronted with injustice on a daily basis. These events do not only entail the grave injustices we see on the news, such as wars and hunger, but also encompass individual events,...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bal, M., & Van den Bos, K. (2010). The role of perpetrator similarity in reactions toward innocent victims. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 957–969. doi:10.1002/ejsp. 668.
Bal, M., & Van den Bos, K. (2012). Blaming for a better future: Future orientation and associated intolerance of personal uncertainty lead to harsher reactions toward innocent victims. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 835–844. doi:10.1177/0146167212442970.
Bègue, L., & Bastounis, M. (2003). Two spheres of belief in justice: Extensive support for the bidimensional model of belief in a just world. Journal of Personality, 71, 435–463. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.7103007.
Callan, M. J., Ellard, J. H., & Nicol, J. E. (2006). The belief in a just world and immanent justice reasoning in adults. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1646–1658. doi:10.1177/0146167206292236.
Callan, M. J., Kay, A. C., Davidenko, N., & Ellard, J. (2009). The effects of justice motivation on memory for self- and other-relevant events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 614–623. doi:10.1016/j.jesp. 2009.02.013.
Callan, M. J., Shead, N. W., & Olson, J. M. (2009). Foregoing the labor for the fruits: The effect of just world threat on the desire for immediate monetary rewards. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 246–249. doi:10.1016/j.jesp. 2008.08.013.
Callan, M. J., Sutton, R. M., & Dovale, C. (2010). When deserving translates into causing: The effects of cognitive load on immanent justice reasoning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1097–1100. doi:10.1016/j.jesp. 2010.05.024.
Correia, I., & Vala, J. (2003). When will a victim be secondarily victimized? The effects of observer’s belief in a just world, victim’s innocence and persistence of suffering. Social Justice Research, 16, 379–400. doi:0885-7466/03/1200-0379/0.
Correia, I., Vala, J., & Aguiar, P. (2001). The effects of belief in a just world and victim’s innocence on secondary victimization, judgements of justice and deservingness. Social Justice Research, 14, 327–342. doi:0885-7466/01/0900-0327/0.
Correia, I., Vala, J., & Aguiar, P. (2007). Victim’s innocence, social categorization, and the threat to the belief in a just world. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 31–38. doi:10.1016/j.jesp. 2005.12.010.
Dalbert, C. (1998). Belief in a just world, well-being, and coping with an unjust fate. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world (pp. 87–105). New York: Plenum Press.
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137–149. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x.
Furnham, A. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00072-7.
Gaucher, D., Hafer, C., Kay, A. C., & Davidenko, N. (2010). Compensatory rationalizations and the resolution of everyday underserved outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 109–118. doi:10.1177/0146167209351701.
Hafer, C. L. (2000a). Do innocent victims threaten the belief in a just world? Evidence from a modified Stroop task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 165–173. doi:10.1037//0011-3514.79.2.165.
Hafer, C. L. (2000b). Investment in long-term goals and commitment to just means drive the need to believe in a just world. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1059–1073. doi:10.1177/01461672002611004.
Hafer, C. L., & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128–167. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.128.
Jost, J., & Banaji, M. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x.
Jost, J., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x.
Kay, A. C., Capliński, S., & Jost, J. (2009). Left-right ideological differences in system justification following exposure to complementary versus noncomplementary stereotype exemplars. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 290–298. doi:10.1002/ejsp. 500.
Kay, A. C., & Friesen, J. (2011). On social stability and social change: Understanding when system justification does and does not occur. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 360–364. doi:10.1177/0963721411422059.
Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Peach, J. M., Friesen, J., Laurin, K., Zanna, M. P., et al. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to view what is as what should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 421–434. doi:10.1037/a0015997.
Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of ‘poor but happy’ and ‘poor but honest’ stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823.
Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., & Young, S. (2005). Victim-derogation and victim-enhancement as alternate routes to system-justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240–246. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00810.x.
Laurin, K., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Kay, A. C. (2011). Social disadvantage and the self-regulatory function of justice beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 149–171. doi:10.1037/a0021343.
Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1–52. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1977.tb00591.x.
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.
Lipkus, I. M., Dalbert, C., & Siegler, I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for other: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666–677. doi:10.1177/0146167296227002.
Martin, L. L. (1999). I-D compensation theory: Some implications of trying to satisfy immediate-return needs in a delayed-return culture. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 195–208.
Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283. doi:10.1037/h0035002.
Otto, K., & Dalbert, C. (2005). Belief in a just world and its functions for young prisoners. Journal of Research in Personality, 6, 559–573. doi:10.1016/j.jrp. 2005.01.004.
Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2005). Justice for all, or just for me? More evidence of the importance of the self-other distinction in just-world beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 637–345. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.010.
Sutton, R. M., Douglas, K. M., Wilkin, K., Elder, T. J., Cole, J. M., & Stathi, S. (2008). Justice for whom, exactly? Beliefs in justice for the self and various others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 528–541. doi:10.1177/0146167207312526.
Van Prooijen, J. W., & Van den Bos, K. (2009). We blame innocent victims more than I do: Self-construal level moderated responses to just-world threats. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1528–1539. doi:10.1177/0146167209344728.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Bal, M., van den Bos, K. (2014). Coping with an Unjust World. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_4121
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_4121
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0752-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0753-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law