Skip to main content

Private and Public in European Higher Education

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory
  • 65 Accesses

Synonyms

Control; Funding; Ownership; Goods

Introduction

The dichotomy public/private has become increasingly crucial in higher education. More precisely, there is a growing pressure to make higher education more private and less public. In many countries, this is also currently the dominant trend.

This aim to increase the level of privatization must be understood in light of the traditional perception of higher education as a public good. The original idea of the university as in terms of universality, i.e., as a community of teachers or students, bears similarities with the notion of higher education as a public good, something held in common to which all contribute and from which all profit. In the Middle Ages, universities formed a trans local community, a network of seats of learning, sanctioned by the Catholic Church. Higher education thus enjoyed a certain degree of independence from local authorities. With the rise of nation states, religious authorities lost most of their...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Academic Ranking of World Universities, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. C. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laval, C., & Weber, L. (Eds.). (2002). Le nouvel ordre éducatif mondial. OMC, Banque Mondiale, OCDE, Commission européenne. Paris: Éditions Nouveaux Regards/Syllepse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2007). The public/private divide in higher education: A global revision. Higher Education, 53, 307–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. Education at a Glance. 2000–2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rider, S., & Waluszewski, A. (2015). Crowding out knowledge: Efficiency, innovation and higher education. In M. Peters, J. M. Paraskeva, & T. Besley (Eds.), The global financial crisis and educational restructuring (pp. 235–248). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S. L., Bonal, X., & Dale, R. (2002). GATS and the education service industry. Comparative Education Review, 46(4), 472–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism. Politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Times Higher Education World University Rankings, 2015/2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1974). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. In General report on the conference on future structures of post-secondary education (pp. 55–101). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verger, J., & Charle, C. (2012). Histoire des universités. XIIIe-XXIe siècle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikael Börjesson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Börjesson, M. (2016). Private and Public in European Higher Education. In: Peters, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_487-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_487-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-532-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics