Skip to main content

Multiliteracies

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory

Definition and Introduction

The term Multiliteracies refers to two major aspects of communication and representation today. The first is the variability of conventions of meaning in different cultural, social, or domain-specific situations. These differences are becoming ever-more significant to the ways in which people interact in a variety of social contexts. As a consequence, it is no longer sufficient for literacy teaching to focus, as it did in the past, primarily on the formal rules and literary canon of a single, standard form of the national language. Rather, the sociolinguistic conditions of our everyday lives increasingly require that we develop a capacity to move between one social setting and another where the conventions of communication may be very different. Such differences are the consequence of any number of factors, including, for instance, culture, gender, life experience, subject matter, discipline domain, area of employment, or specialist expertise.

The second...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. B. (1983). Whole language plus. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, Courtney B. (2006). Connected learning: “weaving” in classroom lessons. In “Pedagogy in practice 2006” conference. University of Newcastle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (1993). The powers of literacy: Genre approaches to teaching writing (p. 286). London/Pittsburgh: Falmer Press/University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). Multiliteracies: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4, 164–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015a). Assessment and pedagogy in the era of machine-mediated learning. In T. Dragonas, K. J. Gergen, & S. McNamee (Eds.), Education as social construction: Contributions to theory, research, and practice. Chagrin Falls: Worldshare Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015b). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015c). The things you do to know: An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Learning by design. London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1995a). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1995b). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Taylor/Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. NewYork: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2010). The teacher as designer: Pedagogy in the new media age. e-Learning and Digital Media, 7, 200–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2011). The work of writing in the age of its digital reproducibility. In S. S. Abrams & J. Rowsell (Eds.), Rethinking identity and literacy education in the 21st century (Vol. 110:1). NewYork: Teachers Collge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2012). Literacies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2015). Regimes of literacy. In M. Hamilton, R. Hayden, K. Hibbert, & R. Stoke (Eds.), Negotiating spaces for literacy learning: Multimodality and governmentality (pp. 15–24). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2017) (forthcoming). Making sense: A grammar of multimodality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., Chan, E., & Dalley-Trim, L. (2016). Literacies (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. R. (1993). Learning to write. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (1994). Getting our hands dirty: Provisional politics in postmodern conditions. In P. Wexler & R. Smith (Eds.), After postmodernism: Education, politics and identity. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, Carmen. (1995). Childhood and parenting in popular culture. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 30(3), 289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (1996a). Text and discourse in education: An introduction to critical discourse analysis. Review of Research in Education, 21, 3–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, C. (1996b). Reading gender and culture in media discourses and texts. In G. Bull & M. Anstey (Eds.), The literacy lexicon. Sydney: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2008). Pedagogy as gift. In J. Albright & A. Luke (Eds.), Pierre Bourdieu and literacy education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, C., & Gore, J. (1992). Feminisms and critical pedagogy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., Cazden, C., Lin, A., & Freebody, P. (2004). The Singapore classroom coding scheme. technical report, National Institute of Education, Center for Research on Pedagogy and Practice, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, S. (2005). Can the intellectual affordances of working class storytelling be leveraged in school? Human Development, 48, 136–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, S., Mary Catherine, O.’. C., & Judith, R. (1993). Literacy as reasoning within multiple discourse: Implications for restructuring learning. In Restructuring learning: 1990 summer institute papers and recommendation (pp. 107–121). Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, S., Richard, S., & Mary Catherine, O.’. C. (2005). Classroom discourse. In Handbook of sociolinguistics. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, M. (2001a). Multiliteracies and indigenous standpoints. In M. Kalantzis & B. Cope (Eds.), Transformations in language and learning: Perspectives on multiliteracies (pp. 113–120). Melbourne: Common Ground.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, M. (2001b). Indigenous peoples, racism and the United Nations. Melbourne: Common Ground.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, M. (2007). Disciplining the savages: Savaging the disciplines. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S. (2011). The tell-tale brain. New York: WW Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Street, B. V. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978 [1962]). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1986 [1934]). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Kalantzis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kalantzis, M., Cope, B. (2017). Multiliteracies. In: Peters, M.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4_112

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics