Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Associations in the Embrace of an Authoritarian State: State Domination of Society?

  • Articles
  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to conventional wisdom, associations that are closely linked with and penetrated by an authoritarian state are significant chiefly as symbols of state domination of society. Yet a review of empirical evidence suggests that the nature and significance of incorporated or co-opted associations varies much more widely than the conventional perspective suggests. Not only are close association-state linkages sometimes looked upon favorably by societal participants, but some independent societal associations actually seek to be co-opted by an authoritarian state. Moreover, incorporated associations often have more to do with strategies by state agencies and officials to accomplish parochial goals than with state efforts to control society. This article elucidates a new analytical perspective for understanding the dynamics and functioning of incorporated associations, citing a wide range of empirical cases to show how this perspective facilitates a better understanding of the kinds of state-society engagement that occur within and through incorporated associations. The article concludes with a brief analysis of associations in contemporary China that builds on the preceding discussion, illuminating the importance of local-level interactions in determining the character of incorporated associations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aberbach, Joel D., Robert D. Putnam, and Bert A. Rockman. 1981.Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, Alice. 1989.Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, Richard and Alexei Shevchenko. 1999. “The ‘State of the State’”, Pp. 333–362 inThe Paradox of China's Post-Mao Reforms, eds. M. Goldman and R. MacFarquhar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, Robert. 1989.Unruly Corporatism: Associational Life in Twentieth-Century Egypt. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, Jesse and Vedat Milor. 1998. “How Cheap is Talk? Consultative Mechanisms and Economic Governance in Malaysia”. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco.

  • Bozeman, Barry. 1987.All Organizations are Public: Bridging Public and Private Organizational Theories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, Michael. 1989. “The Politics of Government-NGO Relations in Africa”.World Development 17 (April): 569–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghy, Thomas M. 1984.The State-Society Struggle: Zaire in Comparative Perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. 1979. “On The Characterization of Authoritarian Regimes in Latin America”. Pp. 33–57 inThe New Authoritarianism in Latin America, ed. D. Collier. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavarozzi, Marcelo and Vicente Palermo. 1995. “State, Civil Society, and Popular Neighborhood Organizations in Buenos Aires: Key Players in Argentina's Transition to Democracy”. Pp. 29–44 inNew Paths to Democratic Development in Latin America: The Rise of NGO-Municipal Collaboration, ed. C. Reilly. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chazan, Naomi, 1994. “Engaging the State: Associational Life in Sub-Saharan Africa”. Pp. 155–191 inState Power and Social Forces: Domination and Transformation in the Third World, ed. J. Migdal, A. Kohli, and V. Shue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chubb, John E. 1983.Interest Groups and the Bureaucracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, John. 1991.Democratizing Development: The Role of Voluntary Organizations. London: Earthscan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Gerard. 1998a. “Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and Polticics in the Developing World”.Political Studies 46 (March): 36–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998a.The Politics of NGOs in S.E. Asia: Participation and Protest in the Philippines. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Joshua and Joel Rogers. 1995. “Secondary Associations and Democratic, Governance”. Pp. 7–98 inAssociations and Democracy, ed. J. Cohen and J. Rogers. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, David. 1995. “Trajectory of a Concept: ‘Corporatism’ in the Study of Latin American Politics”. Pp. 135–162 inLatin America in Comparative Perspective: New Approaches to Methods and Analysis, ed. P. Smith. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, Ruth Berins and David Collier. 1979. “Inducements Versus Constraints: Disaggregating ‘Corporatism’”.American Political Science Review 73 (December): 967–987.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991.Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deyo, Frederic C. 1989Beneath the Miracle: Labor Subordination in the New Asian Industrialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry. 1994. “toward Democratic Consolidation”.Journal of Democratic Participation in Indonesia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, Kenneth P. 1977.The Brazilian corporative State and Working Class Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esman, Milton J. and Norman T. Uphoff. 1984.Local Organizations: Intermediaries in Rural Development. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Peter. 1995.Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Peter (Ed.) 1997.State-Society Synergy: Government and Social Capital in Development. Berkeley: International and Area Studies, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Peter, Dietrich Rueschmeyer, and Theda Skocpol eds. 1985.Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, John and Anthony Bebbington. 1993.Reluctant Partners? Non-Governmental Organizations, the State, and Sustainable Agricultural Development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foweraker, Joe. 1987. “Corporatist Strategies and the Transition to Democracy in Spain.”Comparative Politics 20 (October): 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foweraker, Joe and Ann Craig. 1990.Popular Movements and Political Change in Mexico. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, Alan. 1991. “The Role of NGOs in Changing State-Society Relations.”Development Policy Review 9 (March): 53–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guojia jingji tizhi gaige weiyuanhui jingji guanli si ed. 1989.Zhongguo quyuxing hangye xiehui (Regional Trade Associations of China). Beijing: Zhongguo jihua chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guojia jingwei tigai ju ed. 1989.Zhongguo hangye xiehui minglu (Listing of China's Trade Associations). Beijing: Zhongguo jingji chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyimach-Boadi, E. 1994. “Associational Life, Civil Society, and Democratization in Ghana.” Pp. 125–148 inCivil Society and the State in Africa, ed. J. Harbeson, D. Rothchild, and N. Chazan. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbruun, John R. 1997 “Commerce, Politics, and Business Associations in Benin and Togo.”Comparative Politics 29 (July): 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, Luis and Jonathan Fox. 1995. “Mexico's Difficult Democracy: Grassroots Movements, NGOs, and Local Government.” Pp. 179–210 inNew Paths to Democratic Development in Latin America: The Rise of NGO-Municipal Collaboration, ed. C. Reilly. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jixie dianzi bu tizhi gaige si (ed). 1989.Gongye hangye xiehui zuzhi yu fazhan (The organization and development of industrial trade associations). Beijing: Jixie dianzi bu tizhi gaige si.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, John ed. 1988.Civil Society and the State. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D. 1984. “Approaches to the State.”Comparative Politics 16 (January): 223–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnle, Stein and Per Selle eds. 1992.Government and Voluntary Associations: A Relational Perspective. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, Wai Fung. 1997. “Institutional Design of Public Agencies and Coproduction: A Study of Irrigation Associations in Taiwan.” Pp. 11–47 inState-Society Synergy, Government and Social Capital in Development, ed. P. Evans. Berkeley: International and Area Studies, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, Edward O. and David Knoke. 1987.The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Stephanie. 1993. “Conceptual Issues in the Comparative Study of Regime Change and Democratization.”Comparative Politics 25 (January): 183–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J. 1975. “Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes.” Pp. 175–411 inHandbook of Political Science, Volume 3, ed. F. Greenstein and N. Polsby. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Andrew. 1990.Business and Politics in Indonesia. North Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxfield, Sylvia and Ben Ross Schneider eds. 1997.Business and the State in Developing Countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBeath, Gerald. 1998. “The Changing Role of Business Associations in Democratizing Taiwan.”Journal of Contemporary China 7 (July): 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michels, Robert. 1949.Political Parties. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migdal, Joel S. 1988.Strong Societies and Weak States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — “The State in Society: An Approach to Struggles for Domination.” Pp. 7–36 inState Power and Social Forces: Domination and Transformation in the Third World, ed. J. Migdal, A. Kohli, and V. Shue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1997. “Studying the State.” Pp. 208–236 inComparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, ed. M. Lichbach and A. Zuckerman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migdal, Joel S., Atul Kohli, and Vivienne B. Shue eds. 1994.State Power and Social Forces: Domination and Transformation in the Third World. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Robert P. ed. 1992.The Development of Civil Society in Communist Systems. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, Terry M. 1980.The Organization of Interests: Incentives and the Internal Dynamics of Political Interest Groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, John D. 1988.Bureaucrats and People: Grassroots Participation in Third World Development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevitt, Christopher E. 1996. “Private Business Associations in China: Evidence of Civil Society or Local State Power?”The China Journal 36 (July): 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, Kevin J. 1994. “Chinese People's Congresses and Legislative Embeddedness: Understanding Early Organizational Development.”Comparative Political Studies 27 (April): 80–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1977. “Corporatism and the Question of the State.” Pp. 47–88 inAuthoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America, ed. J. Malloy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Johan P. 1991. “Political Science and Organization Theory: Parallel Agendas but Mutual Disregard.” Pp. 87–119 inPolitical Choice: Institutions, Rules and the Limits of Rationality, ed. R. Czada and A. Windhoff-Heritier. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Margaret. 1994. “The Janus Face of Business Associations in Foreign Enterprises.”The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 33 (January): 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pei, Minxin. 1998. “Chinese Civic Associations: An Empirical Analysis.”Modern China 24 (July): 285–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey. 1997.New Directions for Organization Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey and Gerald R. Salancik. 1982.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, Hal G. 1991.Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Jeremy J. 1993. “Introduction: Pressure Groups and Government.” Pp. 1–18 inPressure Groups, ed. J. Richardson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Mark B. and James M. Malloy. 1978. “Latin American Social Security Policy.” Pp. 157–171 inPolitical Participation in Latin America, Volume I: Citizen and State, ed. J. Booth and M. Seligson. New York: Holmes and Meier Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe C. 1974. “Still the Century of Corporatism?”Review of Politics 36 (Jan.): 85–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Ben Ross and Sylvia Maxfield. 1997. “Business, the State, and Economic Performance in Developing Countries.” Pp. 3–35 inBusiness and the State in Developing Countries, ed. S. Maxfield and B. Schneider. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Frank J. 1998.Advice and Consent: The Politics of Consultation in Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, Philip. 1966.TVA and the Grass-Roots. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Siddhartha. 1999. “Some Aspects of State-NGO Relationships in India in the Post-Independence Era.”Development and Change 30 (April): 327–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shils, Edward. 1991. “The Virtue of Civil Society.”Government and Opposition 26 (Winter): 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavis, Benedict. 1974.Rural Local Governance and Agricultural Development in Taiwan. Ithaca, N.Y.: Rural Development Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepan, Alfred. 1978.The State and Society: Peru in Comparative Perspective. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, James D. 1967.Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tien, Hung-mao. 1989.The Great Transition: Political and Social Change in the Republic of China. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, Jonathan. 1996. “‘Bridges’: Private Business, the Chinese Government, and the Rise of New Associations.”The China Quarterly 147 (September): 795–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger, Jonathan and Anita Chan. 1996. “Corporatism in China: A Developmental State in an East Asian Context,” Pp. 95–129 inChina after Socialism, ed. B. McCormick and J. Unger. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, Robert. 1990.Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Jack L. Jr. 1995.Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Xu. 1999. “Mutual Empowerment of State and Society: Its Nature, Conditions, Mechanisms, and Limits.”Comparative Politics 31 (January): 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wank, David L. 1998.Commodifying Communism: Markets, Trust, and Politics in a South China City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1995. “Bureaucratic Patronage and Private Business: Changing Networks of Power in Urban China.” Pp. 153–183 inThe Waning of the Communist State: Economic Origins of Political Decline in China and Hungary, ed. A. Walder. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Gordon, Jude Howell, and Xiaoyuan Shang. 1996.In Search of Civil Society: Market Reform and Social Change in Contemporary China. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, Susan. 1991. “The Politics of NGO Development in China,”Voluntas 2 (July): 16–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, Susan and Loraine West. 1998. “Government Sources and Uses of Funds at Sub-National Levels”. Prepared for the Ministry of Finance, PRC, under the auspices of Asian Development Bank Technical Assistance No. 2743-PRC.

  • Williamson, Peter J. 1986.Varieties of Corporatism: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, James Q. 1989.Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, Jennifer R. 1990.The Shadow State: Government and Voluntary Sector in Transition. New York: The Foundation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods Dwayne. 1994. “Elites, Ethnicity, and ‘Home Town’ Associations in the Cote D'Ivoire: An Historical Analysis of State-Society Links.”Africa (December) 64: 465–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Gang. 1999.Xingzheng zuzhi guanli (The Management of Administrative Organizations). Beijing: Qinghua University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Ye. 1995. “Chinese NGOs: A Survey Report.” Pp. 93–108 inEmerging Civil Society in the Asia Pacific Community, ed. T. Yamamoto. Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhongguo gongye jingji xiehui ed. 1995.Lun gongye hangye guanli xintizhi (On the new system of industrial trade management). Beijing: Zhongguo shehui chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, Alan S. 1997. “Reformulating Explanatory Standards and Advancing Theory in Comparative Politics.” Pp. 277–310 inComparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, ed. M. Lichbach and A. Zuckerman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Kenneth W. Foster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Kenneth W. Foster is a Ph.D. candidate in the department of political Science at the University of California, Berkeley. His research interests include state-society relations in developing countries, comparative public administration and organizational behavior, and the politics of China and Taiwan. His Ph.D. dissertation focuses on the relationship between bureaucratic processes and the emergence of associations in contemporary China.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foster, K.W. Associations in the Embrace of an Authoritarian State: State Domination of Society?. St Comp Int Dev 35, 84–109 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02732709

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02732709

Keywords

Search

Navigation