Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of arthroscopic and open meniscectomy

  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

THIS study was undertaken to assess the outcome of arthroscopic compared with open meniscectomy. Two groups of thirty patients matched for age, sex, site and type of meniscal lesion were included. Economic, socio-economic subjective and objective results were recorded at follow up. Duration of hospital stay and post operative absence from work and sport were significantly shorter than those treated arthroscopically. Symptomatically, the arthroscopic group reported better results. Clinical examination carried out at the time of recall revealed less muscle wasting and greater range of movement in the arthroscopic group. We feel that although arthroscopic meniscectomy can be technically demanding its results are clearly superior to those achieved by open meniscectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Regan, B. F., O’Hanrahan, N. and McEntee, G. Operative arthroscopy of the knee—A review of 50 consecutive cases of Arthroscopic Meniscectomy. I. Med. J. 1983: 76(1), 27–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McGinty, J. B., Geuss, L. F. and Marrin, R. A. Partial or total meniscectomy. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1977: 59(6), 763–766.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hamberg, P., Gillquist, J. and Lysholm, J. A comparison between Arthroscopic Meniscectomy and Modified Open Meniscectomy. J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br.) 1984: 66-B(2), 189–192.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gillquist, J., Hamberg, P. and Lysholm, J. Endoscopic Partial and Total Meniscectomy. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1982: 53, 975–979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Northmore-Ball, M. D., Dandy, D. J. and Jackson, R. W. Arthroscopic. Open Partial and Total Meniscectomy. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1983: 65-B (4), 400–404.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pettrone, F. A. Meniscectomy: Arthrotomy versus Arthroscopy. Am. J. Sports Med. 1982: 10(6), 355–359.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergstrom, R., Hamberg, P. Lysholm, J. and Gillquist, J. Comparison of Open and Endoscopic Meniscectomy. Clin. Orthop. 1984: 184, 133–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lysholm, J. and Gillquist, J. The evaluation of knee ligament surgery with special emphasis to the use of a Knee Scoring Scale. Am. J. Sports Med. 1981: 10, 150–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Carroll, P. F., MacAuley, P., Mulvihill, N., Walsh, M. and McManus, F. Arthroscopic Meniscectomy. I. Med. J. 1983: 76(8), 351–352.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dandy, D. J. Early results of closed and partial Meniscectomy. Br. Med. J. 1978: i, 1099–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamberg, P., Gillquist, J., Lsyholm, J. and Oberg, B. The effect of diagnostic and operative arthroscopy and open meniscectomy on muscle strength in the thigh. Am. J. Sports Med. 1983: 11(5), 289–292.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Goodfellow, J. W. Closed Meniscectomy. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1983: 65-B. 373–374.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Byrne, J., Moran, R., MacAuley, P. et al. A comparative study of arthroscopic and open meniscectomy. I.J.M.S. 157, 191–192 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02949296

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02949296

Keywords

Navigation