Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of life and care in leukemia, myeloma and non-malignant disease. Opinions of patients and relatives, and effects of geography and time

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Medical Oncology and Tumor Pharmacotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a questionnaire study 140 subjects answered 4200 questions in 1980 and 1986. They consisted of patients with myeloma, acute leukemia, lung carcinoma, and non-malignant disease and their relatives. In 22 additional cases the questionnaire was not answered.

The results show that myeloma patients are less content with the general care than leukemia patients (P < 0.05). Similarly, relatives of deceased myeloma patients are less satisfied with the information given to them than relatives of deceased leukemia patients (P < 0.001). The information has improved with time, however, since the patients were more satisfied in 1986 than in 1980 (P < 0.001) and relatives of myeloma patients still alive were more satisfied than relatives of patients who had died earlier (P < 0.001).

The opinions of patients were similar to those of their relatives. However, the relatives of leukemia patients were even more satisfied with the contact with the medical staff than the patients themselves (P < 0.05).

As many as 10–30% of the relatives never gave up hope for their relative’s survival. Only two out of 27 deaths were considered not dignified.

The lung carcinoma patients reported a less good quality of life (P < 0.001), and less satisfaction with the information given (P < 0.01), than the hematological patients from the same year. Similarly, their attitude to the medical care improved less (P < 0.01), and they were less content with the general care than the leukemia group (P < 0.05).

The non-malignant patients rated their quality of life less highly than the hematological patients from the same year (P < 0.001). They were also less satisfied with the contacts with the staff (P < 0.001) and with the information given (P < 0.001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Priestman T J, Baum M: Evaluation of quality of life in patients receiving treatment for advanced breast cancer.Lancet 1, 899 (1976).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernheim J: Anamnestic comparative selfappraisal: a measure of the quality of life of cancer patients.Proc Am Soc clin Oncol 21, 357 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Spitzer W O, Dobson A J, Hall J, Chesterman E, Levi J, Shepherd R, Battista R N, Catchlove B R: Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients. A concise QL-index for use by physicians.J chron Dis 34, 585 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sygarbaker P H, Barofsky I, Rosenberg S A, Gianola F J: Quality of life assessment of patients in extremity sarcoma trials.Surgery 91, 17 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schipper H, Clinch J, McMurray A, Levitt M: Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the functional living index-cancer: development and validation.J clin Oncol 2, 472 (1984).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reizenstein P: Quality of life in cancer patients.Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother 3, 51 (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Karnofsky D A, Abelmann W H, Craver L F, Burchenal J H: The use of the nitrogen mustards in the palliative treatment of carcinoma.Cancer 1, 634 (1948).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beck A T, Ward C H, Mendelson M, Mock J, Berbaugh J: An inventory for measuring depression.Arch gen Psychiat 4, 561 (1961).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Spielberger C D, Gorsuch R L, Lushene R E:STAI Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA, Consulting Psychologists Press (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Melzack R: The McGill pain questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods.Pain 1, 277 (1975).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Katz S, Akpom C A: A measure of primary sociobiological functions.Int J Hlth Serv 6, 493 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fazio A F: A concurrent validational study of the NCHS general well-being schedule. DHEW Publication No. 78–1347. U.S. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare (1977).

  13. Goldberg D P, Hellier V F: A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire.Psych Med 9, 139 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wenger N K, Matton M E, Furberg C D, Elinson J (eds):Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Therapies. New York, Le Jacq (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abdellah F G, Levine E: Developing a measure of patient and personnel satisfaction with nursing care.Nursing Res 5, 100 (1957).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Korsch B M, Gozzi E K, Francis V: Gaps in doctorpatient communication. I. Doctor-patient interaction and patient satisfaction.Pediatrics 42, 855 (1968).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pablo R Y: Assessing patient satisfaction in long-term care institutions.Hospital Administration in Canada 17, 22 (1975).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Risser N L: Development of an instrument to measure patient satisfaction with nurses and nursing care in primary care settings.Nursing Res 24, 45 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tessler R, Mechanic D: Consumer satisfaction with prepaid group practice: a comparative study.J Hlth soc Behav 16, 95 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Larsen D E, Rootman I: Physician role performance and patient satisfaction.Soc Sci Med 10, 29 (1976).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ware J E Jr, Snyder M K, Wright W R: Development and validation of scales to measure patient satisfaction with health care services. Vol.1 of a final report prepared for the National Center for Health Services Research, Health Resources Administration, Department of Health Education and Welfare, by the School of Medicine, Southern Illinois University. Part A+B Illinois (1976).

  22. Dunt D R, Le Moine Parker M: A comparative study of obstetric care in Greek migrant and Australianborn women. II. Determinants of satisfaction.Med J Aust 2, 80 (1977).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson-Barnett J: In hospital: patients’ feelings and opinions.Nursing Times 78, 29 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Woolley F R, Kane R L, Hughes C C, Wright D D: The effects of doctor-patient communication on satisfaction and outcome of care.Soc Sci Med 12, 123 (1978).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Israel J:The Patients’ Opinions About the Hospital (in Swedish). Uppsala, Almqvist & Wiksell (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Department of Health and Social Security, the Welsh Office. Report of the Committee on Hospital Complaints Procedure. London, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (1973).

  27. Ellström A M: Evaluation of out-patient on-call services in Karlstad (in Swedish). Göteborg, Univ. of Göteborg (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Meenan R F, Gertman P M, Mason J H: Measuring health status in arthritis.Arthritis Rheum 23, 146 (1980).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wiklund I, Lindvall K, Swedberg K: Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials.Acta Med scand 220, 1 (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Olsson G, Lubsen J, van Es G A, Rehnqvist N: Quality of life after myocardial infarction: effect of long term metoprolol on mortality and morbidity.Br Med J 292, 1491 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Croog S H, Levine S, Testa M A, Brown B, Bulpitt C J, Jenkins D C, Klerman G L, Williams G H: The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life.New Engl J Med 314, 1657 (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lebow J L: Consumer assessments of the quality of medical care.Med Care 12, 328 (1974).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Young S R, Hulett R M, van Reesema F S, Griffith E: Computerized system of auditing medical records provides statistical base on which to judge quality of care in institutions. Hospitals,J Am Hosp Ass 46, 68 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lindgren B, Persson U: A health index for resource allocation (in Swedish).Läkartidningen 83, 3260 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Eidinger R N, Schapira D V: Cancer patients’ insight into their treatment, prognosis, and unconventional therapies.Cancer 53, 2736 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Söderberg S, Tollemar S: Patient interviews — a method to elucidate, simplify, and improve the medical service (in Swedish).Läkartidningen 82, 2075 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ware J EJr, Snyder M K, Wright W R: Some issues in the measurement of patient satisfaction with health care services. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Paper Series 6021 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Preliminarily reported at the First International Symposium for Quality Assurance in Health Care, Paris, November 1986.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ösby, E., Reizenstein, P. Quality of life and care in leukemia, myeloma and non-malignant disease. Opinions of patients and relatives, and effects of geography and time. Med. Oncol. & Tumor Pharmacother. 6, 133–141 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985236

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985236

Key words

Navigation