Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Unternehmensethik als Gegenstand betriebswirtschaftlicher Forschung und Lehre–Eine Bestandsaufnahme aus internationaler Perspektive

  • Unternehmensethik und CSR
  • Published:
Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Beitrag bietet einen Überblick über den Status Quo in der unternehmensethischen Forschung und Lehre im internationalen Bereich. Nach einer kurzen Begriffsklärung werden zunächst Entwicklung und Strukturen des Faches skizziert. Alsdann analysiert der Beitrag bedeutende Forschungsrichtungen des Feldes und beschreibt den Stellenwert von Unternehmensethik in der weltweiten Managementausbildung. Darüber hinaus werden wesentliche Zukunftstrends in der inhaltlichen Entwicklung des Faches aufgezeigt. Der Beitrag schließt mit einigen vergleichenden Bemerkungen über die Bedeutung des Feldes im deutschsprachigen Raum und wagt einen abschließenden Ausblick.

Abstract

This paper attempts at providing an overview over the international debate in business ethics (and related concepts). It addresses some of the labels and concepts of the field internationally before providing an overview over the development of the field and its key structural elements. It then moves on to adumbrate key areas of research and sketches out the current state-of-the-art in the teaching of business ethics. Finally, the paper ventures a foray into key ongoing developments in the field and offers some comments on the current state of affairs in business ethics in the German speaking countries. The remarks close with some comments on the future of business ethics teaching and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Albach, Horst (2005), Betriebswirtschaftslehre ohne Unternehmensethik!, in: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 75. Jg., S. 809–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albach, Horst (2007), Unternehmenstheorie und Unternehmensethik, in: Schwalbach, Joachim/ Fandel, Günter (Hrsg.), Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Special Issue 1/2007, Der Ehrbare Kaufmann: Modernes Leitbild für Unternehmen?, S. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, Mats/ Willmott, Hugh (1992), Critical theory and management studies: An introduction, in: Alvesson, Mats/ Willmott, Hugh (Hrsg.), Critical management studies, London, S. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, Samuel B. (1989), Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, S. 495–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, Subhabrata Bobby (2003), The practice of stakeholder colonialism: National interest and colonial discourses in the management of indigenous stakeholders, in: Prasad, A. (Hrsg.), Postcolonial theory and organizational analysis, New York, S. 255–279.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael L./ Salomon, Robert M. (2006), Beyond dichotomy: the curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27, S. 1101–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, Bernard M./ Steidlmeier, Paul (1999), Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior, in: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 10, S. 181–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, Kunal/ Palazzo, Guido (2008), Corporate Social Responsibility: A process model of sensemaking, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, S. 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C.B./ Sen, Sankar (2003), Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies’, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 67, S. 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, David/ Moon, Jeremy (2004), Corporate social responsibility in Asia, in: Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Special Issue, S. 18–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boje, David M./ Dennehy, Robert F. (1993), Managing in the postmodern world, Dubuque, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, Howard R (1953), Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, Norman E. (1999), Business ethics: A Kantian perspective, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, John/ Drahos, Peter (2000), Global Business Regulation, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickson, Shelley L. (2007), Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, S. 864–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brief, Arthur P./ Buttram, Robert T./ Dukerich, Janet M. (2000), Collective corruption in the corporate world: Toward a process model, in: Turner, Marlene E. (Hrsg.), Groups at Work: Advances in Theory and Research, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Michael E./ Trevino, Linda K. (2006), Ethical leadership: A review and future directions, in: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 17, S. 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Michael E./ Treviño, Linda K./ Harrison, David A. (2005), Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 97, S. 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John L. (2006), Institutional Analysis and the Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility, in: American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 49, S. 925–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, Tom (1994), Corporate responsibility, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Archie B. (1991), The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders, in: Business Horizons, Vol. 34, S. 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Archie B. (1999), Corporate social responsibility–evolution of a definitional construct, in: Business & Society, Vol. 38, S. 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Archie B./ Buchholtz, Ann K. (2006), Business & society: ethics and stakeholder management, 6. Aufl., Mason, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, Wendy/ Moon, Jeremy (2005), Corporate Social Responsibility in Asia: A Seven Country Study of CSR Website Reporting, in: Business and Society, Vol. 44, S. 415–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapham, Andrew (2006), Human rights obligations of non-state actors, Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Denis/ Wartick, Steven L (1995), Business and society/business ethics courses, in: Business & Society, Vol. 34, S. 51–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Andrew/ Matten, Dirk (2004), Questioning the Domain of the Business Ethics Curriculum, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 54, S. 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Andrew/ Matten, Dirk (2007), Business ethics. Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization, 2. Aufl., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Andrew/ Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy (2008), Corporations and Citizenship, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Andrew/ McWilliams, Abagail/ Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy/ Siegel, Donald (Hrsg.) (2008), The Oxford Handbook of CSR, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hond, Frank/ De Bakker, Frank G. A. (2007), Deologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, S. 901–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J./ Powell, Walter W. (1983), The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, in: American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, S. 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Lex (1996), For positivist organization theory, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Thomas (2003), Editor’s comments: taking ethics seriously–A mission now more possible, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, S. 363–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Thomas/ Dunfee, Thomas W. (1994), Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 19, S. 252–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John S. (1999), Transnational democracy, in: Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 7, S. 30–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, Thomas W./ Hess, David (2007), The Kasky-Nike threat to corporate social reporting, in: Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 17, S. 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, Fabrizio/ Pfeffer, Jeffrey/ Sutton, Robert I. (2005), Economic language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 30, S. 8–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R Edward (1984), Strategic management. A stakeholder approach, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton (1962), Capitalism and freedom, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frooman, Jeff (1999), Stakeholder influence strategies, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, S. 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frynas, Jedrzej George (2005), The false developmental promise of Corporate Social Responsibility: evidence from multinational oil companies, in: International Affairs, Vol. 81, S. 581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Archon (2003), Deliberative democracy and international labor standards, in: Governance: an International Journal of Policy and Administration, Vol. 16, Nr. 1, S. 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardberg, Naomi A./ Fombrun, Charles J. (2006), Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, S. 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, Elisabet/ Melé, Domènec (2004), Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 53, S. 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, Sumantra (2003), Business schools share the blame for ENRON: Teaching brutal theories leads naturally to management brutality, in: Business Ethics, Vol. 17, S. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, Sumantra (2005), Bad management theories are destroying good management practices, in: Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 4, S. 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habisch, Andre/ Jonker, Jan/ Wegner, Martina/ Schmidpeter, René (Hrsg.) (2004), CSR across Europe, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, Charles (2002), What’s a business for?, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80, S. 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Stuart L. (1997), Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable world, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 75, S. 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Stuart L. (2005), Capitalism at the crossroads: the unlimited business opportunities in solving the world’s most difficult problems, Upper Saddle River, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, Paul Alexander (2008), The Corporate Social Responsibility System in Latin America and the Caribbean, in: Crane, Andrew/ Matten, Dirk (Hrsg.), Corporate Social Responsibility–Sage Library in Business and Management, Vol. 3, London, in Druck.

  • Jawahar, I. M./ McLaughlin, Gary L. (2001), Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, S. 397–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones Christensen, Lisa/ Peirce, Ellen/ Hartman, Laura P./ Hoffman, W. Michael/ Carrier, Jamie (2007), Ethics, CSR, and Sustainability Education in the Financial Times Top 50 Global Business Schools: Baseline Data and Future Research Directions, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 73, S. 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinley, David/ Chambers, Rachel (2006), The UN Human Rights Norms for Corporations: The Private Implications of International Law, in: Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 6, S. 447–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobrin, Stephen J. (2001), Sovereignty @bay: globalization, multinational enterprise, and the international political system, in: Rugman, A. M./ Brewer, Thomas (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of international business, Oxford, S. 181–205.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, Daryl (2005), Transforming our Students: Teaching Business Ethics Post Enron, in: Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 15, S. 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias (2002), Transnational Corporations and Public Accountability, in: Government and Opposition, Vol. 39, S. 234–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, Philip/ Lee, Nancy (2004), Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause, Hoboken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küpper, Hans-Ulrich (2006), Unternehmensethik, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, David (2008), Political contestation in global production networks, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, in Druck

  • Lichtenstein, Nelson (Hrg.) (2006), Wal-Mart. The face of twenty-first century capitalism, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livesey, Sharon M. (2001), Eco-identity as discursive struggle: Royal Dutch/Shell, Brent Spar, and Nigeria, in: Journal of Business Communication, Vol. 38, S. 58–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A./ Moon, J./ Visser, W. (2006), Corporate Social Responsibility in Management Research: Focus, Nature, Salience and Sources of Influence, in: Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43, S. 115–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, Yvette P./ Rechner, Paula L./ Olson-Buchanan, Julie B. (2005), Shaping ethical perceptions: An empirical assessment of the influence of business education, culture, and demographic factors, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 60, S. 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, John (1990), Teaching business ethics in the UK, Europe, and the USA: a comparative study, London; Atlantic Highlands, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, Joshua Daniel/ Walsh, James P. (2001), People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, Joshua Daniel/ Walsh, James P. (2003), Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 48, S. 268–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, Dirk/ Crane, Andrew (2005), Corporate citizenship: toward an extended theoretical conceptualization, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 30, S. 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy (2004), Corporate Social Responsibility Education in Europe, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 54, S. 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy (2008), ‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, in Druck.

  • Messick, David M./ Bazerman, Max H. (1996), Ethical Leadership and the Psychology of Decision Making, in: Sloan Management Review, Vol. 37, S. 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midttun, Atle/ Gautesen, Kristian/ Gjølberg, Maria (2006), The political economy of CSR in Western Europe, in: Corporate Governance: the International Journal of Business in Society, Vol. 6, S. 369–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, Henry (1983), The Case For Corporate Social Responsibility, in: Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 4, S. 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, Henry (2004), Managers Not MBAs. A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development, London et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, Henry/ Simons, Robert/ Basu, Kunal (2002), Beyond Selfishness, in: MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 44, S. 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misangyi, Vilmos F./ Weaver, Gary R./ Elms, Heather (2008), Ending corruption: The interplay between institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, in Druck.

  • Moore, Don A./ Tetlock, Philip E./ Tanlu, Lloyd/ Bazerman, Max H. (2006), Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence: Moral seduction and strategic issue cycling, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, S. 10–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, Mark/ Schmidt, Frank L./ Rynes, Sara L. (2003), Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis, in: Organization Studies, Vol. 24, S. 403–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, Bettina (2000), Interkulturelle Unternehmensethik. Deutsche und Amerikanische Ansätze im Vergleich, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, Bettina (2002), U.S.-American and German business ethics: an intercultural comparison, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 41, S. 195–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, Guido/ Basu, Kunal (2007), The Ethical Backlash of Corporate Branding, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 73, S. 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, Guido/ Scherer, Andreas (2006), Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation: A Communicative Framework, in: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 66, S. 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Robert (2003), Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Robert/ Freeman, R Edward/ Wicks, Andrew C (2003), What stakeholder theory is not, in: Business Ethics Quarterly, 13. Jg., S. 479–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl Raimund (1959), The logic of scientific discovery, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E./ Kramer, M R (2002), The competitve advantage of corporate philanthropy, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80, S. 56–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E./ Kramer, Mark R. (2006), Strategy & Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84, S. 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, Coimbatore Krishnarao (2005), The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, Coimbatore Krishnarao/ Hammond, Allen (2002), Serving the world’s poor, profitably, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80, S. 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puppim de Oliveira, Jose Antonio/ Vargas, Getulio (2006), Corporate Citizenship in Latin America: New Challenges for Business, in: Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Nr. 21, Special Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossouw, Gedeon (2005), Business Ethics and Corporate Governance in Africa, in: Business & Society, Vol. 44, S. 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, Timothy I./ Moldoveanu, Mihnea (2003), When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, S. 204–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, John Gerard (2004), Reconstituting the public domain - issues, actors, and practices, in: European Journal of International Relations, 10. Jg., S. 499–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Andreas Georg/ Palazzo, Guido (2007), Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility–business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, S. 1096–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Andreas Georg/ Palazzo, Guido (Hrsg.) (2008), Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seth, Anju/ Zinkhan, George (1991), Strategy and the research process: A comment, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, S. 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, Paul (1986), Is strategic management ideological?, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 12, S. 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. Craig/ Simpson, Sally S./ Huang, Chun-Yao (2007), Why managers fail to do the right thing: An empirical study of unethical and illegal conduct, in: Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 17, S. 633–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Robert C. (1993), Ethics and excellence, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonenshein, Scott (2007), The Role of Construction, Intuition, and Justification in Responding to Ethical Issues at Work: The Sensemaking-Intuition Model, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, S. 1022–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spar, Debora L./ La Mure, Lane T. (2003), The power of activism: Assessing the impact of NGOs on global business, in: California Management Review, Vol. 45, S. 78–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram, Anant K./ Inkpen, Andrew C. (2004), The corporate objective revisited, in: Organization Science, Vol. 15, S. 350–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teegen, Hildy/ Doh, Jonathan P./ Vachani, Sushil (2004), The importance of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in global governance and value creation: An international business research agenda, in: Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 35, S. 463–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, Linda K. (1986), Ethical decision making in organizations: a person-situation interactionist model, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, S. 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, Linda Klebe/ Weaver, Gary R. (1994), Business ETHICS/BUSINESS ethics: One field or two?, in: Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 4, S. 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, Wayne (2008), CSR in Developing Countries, in: Crane, Andrew/ McWilliams, Abagail/ Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy/ Siegel, Donald (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of CSR, Oxford, in Druck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, Wayne/ Matten, Dirk/ Pohl, Manfred/ Tolhurst, Nick (Hrsg.) (2008), The A-Z of Corporate Social Responsibility - The Complete Reference of Concepts, Codes and Organisations, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, Wayne/ McIntosh, Malcolm/ Middleton, Charlotte (Hrsg.) (2006), Corporate citizenship in Africa–Lessons from the past; paths into the future, Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartick, Steven L/ Cochran, Philip L. (1985), The evolution of the corporate social performance model, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 10, S. 758–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E. (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windsor, Duane (2008), Educating for Responsible Management, in: Crane, Andrew/ McWilliams, Abagail/ Matten, Dirk/ Moon, Jeremy/ Siegel, Donald (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of CSR, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Klaus Dieter (2006), Private actors and the legitimacy of governance beyond the state. Conceptional outlines and empirical explorations, in: Benz, Arthur/ Papadopoulos, Yannis (Hrsg.), Governance and Democracy Comparing National, European and International Experiences, London, S. 200–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Donna J (1991), Corporate social performance revisited, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, S. 691–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Iris Marion (2004), Responsibility and global labor justice, in: Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 12, S. 365–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hewlett-Packard Chair in Corporate Social Responsibility, Schulich School of Business, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3, Canada

    Dirk Matten (Professor of Strategy)

  2. Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, CH-1015, Switzerland

    Guido Palazzo (Professor of Business Ethics)

Authors
  1. Dirk Matten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guido Palazzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Matten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matten, D., Palazzo, G. Unternehmensethik als Gegenstand betriebswirtschaftlicher Forschung und Lehre–Eine Bestandsaufnahme aus internationaler Perspektive. Schmalenbachs Z betriebswirtsch Forsch 60 (Suppl 58), 50–71 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372967

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372967

Search

Navigation