Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of spatial autocorrelation on CPUE standardization between two different fisheries

  • Published:
Journal of Oceanology and Limnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Catch per unit of effort (CPUE) data can display spatial autocorrelation. However, most of the CPUE standardization methods developed so far assumes independency of observations for the dependent variable, which is often invalid. In this study, we collected data of two fisheries, squid jigging fishery and mackerel trawl fishery. We used standard generalized linear model (GLM) and spatial GLMs to compare the impact of spatial autocorrelation on CPUE standardization for different fisheries. We found that spatial- GLMs perform better than standard-GLM for both fisheries. The overestimation of precision of CPUE estimates was observed in both fisheries. Moran’s I was used to quantify the level of autocorrelation for the two fisheries. The results show that autocorrelation in mackerel trawl fishery was much stronger than that in squid jigging fishery. According to the results of this paper, we highly recommend to account for spatial autocorrelation when using GLM to standardize CPUE data derived from commercial fisheries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhattarai K R, Vetaas O R, Grytnes J A. 2004. Fern species richness along a central Himalayan elevational gradient, Nepal. Journal of Biogeography, 31 (3): 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell R A. 2004. CPUE standardisation and the construction of indices of stock abundance in a spatially varying fishery using general linear models. Fisher ies Research, 70 (2–3): 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell R A. 2015. Constructing stock abundance indices from catch and effort data: some nuts and bolts. Fisheries Research, 161: 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carl G, Kühn I. 2007. Analyzing spatial autocorrelation in species distributions using Gaussian and logit models. Ecological M odelling, 207 (2–4): 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N A. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, New York. p.1-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dormann C F. 2007. Effects of incorporating spatial autocorrelation into the analysis of species distribution data. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16 (2): 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn P K. 2009. Improving comparisons between models for CPUE. Fisheries Research, 97 (1–2): 148–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan W J, Tian S Q, Wang X F, Zhu J F, Chen X J. 2014. A review of methods and model selection for standardizing CPUE. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 21 (4): 852–862. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Thuiller W. 2005. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters, 8 (9): 993–1 009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haining R. 2003. Spatial Data Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. p.50-290.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harley S J, Myers R A, Dunn A. 2001. Is catch-per-unit-effort proportional to abundance? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58 (9): 1 760–1 772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins B A, Porter E E. 2003. Does herbivore diversity depend on plant diversity? The case of California butterflies. The American Naturalist, 161 (1): 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton M G, Maunder M N. 2004. Methods for standardizing CPUE and how to select among them. Col. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 56 (1): 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao Y, O’reilly R, Smith E, Orth D. 2016. Integrating spatial synchrony/asynchrony of population distribution into stock assessment models: a spatial hierarchical Bayesian statistical catch-at-age approach. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil, 73 (7): 1 725–1 738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleisner K M, Walter J F, Diamond S L, Die D J. 2010. Modeling the spatial autocorrelation of pelagic fish abundance. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 411: 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Cao J, Zou X R, Chen X J, Runnebaum J. 2016. Modeling habitat suitability index for Chilean jack mackerel (Trachurus murphyi) in the South East Pacific. Fisheries Research, 178: 48–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z G, Ye Z J, Wan R, Zhang C. 2015. Model selection between traditional and popular methods for standardizing catch rates of target species: a case study of Japanese Spanish mackerel in the gillnet fishery. Fisheries Research, 161: 161–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebhold A, Koenig W D, Bjørnstad O N. 2004. Spatial synchrony in population dynamics. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35 (1): 467–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maunder M N, Sibert J R, Fonteneau A, Hampton J, Kleiber P, Harley S J. 2006. Interpreting catch per unit effort data to assess the status of individual stocks and communities. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 63 (8): 1 373–1 385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelder J A, Wedderburn R W M. 1972. Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, 135 (3): 370–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida T, Chen D G. 2004. Incorporating spatial autocorrelation into the general linear model with an application to the yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) longline CPUE data. Fisheries Research, 70 (2–3): 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibel B A. 2013. The jumbo squid, Dosidicus gigas (Ommastrephidae), living in oxygen minimum zones II: Blood-oxygen binding. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 95: 95–139..

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J S, Field J C, Markaida U, Gilly W F. 2013. Behavioral ecology of jumbo squid (Dosidicus gigas) in relation to oxygen minimum zones. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 95: 95–197..

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorson J T, Shelton A O, Ward E J, Skaug H J. 2015. Geostatistical delta-generalized linear mixed models improve precision for estimated abundance indices for West Coast groundfishes. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72 (5): 1 297–1 310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian S Q, Chen X J, Chen Y, Xu L X, Dai X J. 2009. Standardizing CPUE of Ommastrephes bartramii for Chinese squid-jigging fishery in Northwest Pacific Ocean. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 27 (4): 729–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian S Q, Han C, Chen Y, Chen X J. 2013. Evaluating the impact of spatio-temporal scale on CPUE standardization. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 31 (5): 935–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh W A, Brodziak J. 2015. Billfish CPUE standardization in the Hawaii longline fishery: model selection and multimodel inference. Fisheries Research, 166: 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Jiao Y, Winter A. 2011. Catch-rate standardization for yellow perch in Lake Erie: a comparison of the spatial generalized linear model and the generalized additive model. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 140 (4): 905–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu W, Yi Q, Chen X J, Chen Y. 2016. Modelling the effects of climate variability on habitat suitability of jumbo flying squid, Dosidicus gigas, in the Southeast Pacific Ocean offPeru. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 73 (2): 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T L, Lin G. 2008. Identification of local clusters for count data: a model-based Moran’s I test. Journal of Applied Statistics, 35 (3): 293–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Chinese Oversea Fishery Association (COFA) and NOAA for providing data. We are grateful of CHANG Yongbo in College of Marine Sciences Shanghai Ocean University who has spent much time working in a mackerel trawl vessel and provides the information about the fishery. We also thank the Chinese Distant-water Squid Jigging Technical Group for providing fishery data and information.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinjun Chen  (陈新军).

Additional information

Supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (No. 2012AA092303), the Public Science and Technology Research Funds Projects of Ocean (No. 20155014), the Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project, the Funding Program for Outstanding Dissertation in Shanghai Ocean University, and Y. Chen was supported by SHOU International Center for Marine Studies and Shanghai 1000 Talent Program

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, L., Chen, X., Guan, W. et al. The impact of spatial autocorrelation on CPUE standardization between two different fisheries. J. Ocean. Limnol. 36, 973–980 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-018-6294-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-018-6294-7

Keyword

Navigation