Skip to main content
Log in

A critical testing of the applicability of some empirical relations used in the science and engineering of earthquakes through the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many empirical relations have been proposed for estimating the fundamental characteristics of earthquakes and the induced tsunamis as well as for the strong-motion parameters, liquefaction potential, limiting distances for slope failures, damage to underground openings and even the possibility of surface damage due to room and pillar mines and quarries. The 2011 Great East Japan earthquake is probably the only mega-earthquake providing abundant quatitative information for the science and engineering of earthquakes although the rupture observations were obscured. The quantitative data from this earthquake should be quite useful for testing many empirical relations used in the science and engineering of earthquakes as they comprise an almost upper limit for the magnitude of earthquakes. The author compares the available empirical relations utilized for estimating the fundamental characteristics (i.e., relative slip, length, area, duration) of earthquakes as a function of their moment magnitude and attenuation of strong motion parameters such as maximum ground acceleration and velocity. Furthermore, some available empirical relations used from estimating the limiting hypocentral distances for ground liquefaction, slope failures, damage to underground openings and even the possibility of surface damage due to room and pillar mines are compared with observations made during the reconnaissance visits by various researchers including those provided by the author. The available empirical relations are compared with observations and instrumental data, and their applicability and limits are critically discussed in this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe K (1979) Size of great earthquakes of 1837–1974 inferred from tsunami data. J Geophys Res 84(B4):1561–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN (1988) Engineering Seismology. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 5(17):1–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydan Ö (1997) Seismic characteristics of Turkish earthquakes. Turkish Earthquake Foundation, TDV/TR 97-007, 41

  • Aydan Ö (2001) Comparison of suitability of submerged tunnel and shield tunnel for subsea passage of Bosphorus. Geol Eng J 25(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydan Ö (2007) Inference of seismic characteristics of possible earthquakes and liquefaction and landslide risks from active faults(in Turkish). The 6th National Conference on earthquake engineering of Turkey, Istanbul, Vol1, 563–574

  • Aydan Ö (2008) Seismic and tsunami hazard potentials in Indonesia with a special emphasis on Sumatra Island. J Sch Mar Sci Technol, Tokai Univ 6(3):19–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydan Ö (2012a) Ground motions and deformations associated with earthquake faulting and their effects on the safety of engineering structures. In: Meyers R (ed) Encyclopedia of sustainability science and technology. Springer, New York, pp 3233–3253

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aydan Ö, Geniş M (2012) Effects of earthquake on underground structures including subsea tunnels. Proceedings of the 65th Years Mahir Vardar–Geomechanics, tunneling and design of rock structures–special sessions, Istanbul, pp 17–44

  • Aydan Ö (2013) The effects of earthquakes on rock slopes. Proceedings of the 47th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, CA, Paper No.13–378, 10p

  • Aydan Ö, Ohta Y (2011) A new proposal for strong ground motion estimations with the consideration of characteristics of earthquake fault. Seventh National Conference on earthquake engineering, Istanbul, Turkey Paper No 65: pp 1–10

  • Aydan Ö, Tano H (2012) The observations on abandoned mines and quarries by the Great East Japan Earthquake on March 11, 2011 and their implications. J Jpn Assoc Earthq Eng 12(4):229–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydan Ö, Sezaki M, Yarar R (1996) The seismic characteristics of Turkish Earthquakes. The 11th World Conference on earthquake engineering, CD-2, Paper No:1270

  • Aydan Ö, Kumsar H, Ulusay R (2002) How to infer the possible mechanism and characteristics of earthquakes from the strations and ground surface traces of existing faults. JSCE, Earthq Struct Eng Div 19(2):199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydan Ö, Ohta S, Hamada M (2009a) Geotechnical evaluation of slope and ground failures during the 8 October 2005 Muzaffarabad earthquake, Pakistan. J Seismol 13(3):399–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydan Ö, Ohta Y, Hamada M, Ito J, Ohkubo K(2009b)The response and damage of structures along the fault rupture traces of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake. International Conference on earthquake engineering: the 1st Anniversary of Wenchuan Earthquake, Chengdu, pp 625–633

  • Aydan Ö, Ohta Y, Geniş M, Tokashiki N, Ohkubo K (2010) Response and stability of underground structures in rock mass during earthquakes. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43(6):857–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydan Ö, Tano H, Iwatate T (2011) Characteristics of Damage to Structures Induced by The Tsunami of The 2011 East Japan Mega Earthquake. First International Conference on geotechnique, construction materials and environment, Mie, Japan, 505–510

  • Aydan Ö, Ulusay R, Hamada M, Beetham D (2012) Geotechnical aspects of the 2010 Darfield and 2011 Christchurch earthquakes of New Zealand and geotechnical damage to structures and lifelines. Bull Eng Geol Environ 71(4):637–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydan Ö, Ulusay R, Kumsar H, Sönmez H, Tuncay E (1998) A site investigation of June 27, 1998 Adana-Ceyhan earthquake. Turkish Earthquake Foundation, TDV/DR 006-03, p 131

  • Cabinet Office, Government of Japan (2011) http://www.bousai.go.jp/jishin/ (in Japanese)

  • Campbell KW (1981) Near source attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71(6):2039–2070

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler CMR (1990) The solid earth—an introduction to global geophysics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukushima Y, Tanaka T, Kataoka S (1988) A new attenuation relationship for peak ground acceleration derived from strong motion accelerograms, 9th WCEE, Tokyo, pp 343–348

  • Geographical Information Authority of Japan (GSI) (2011) Special web site for East Japan mega earthquake. http://www.gsi.go.jp/BOUSAI/

  • HARVARD (2011) http://www.seismology.harvard.edu/

  • Iida K (1963) Magnitude, energy and generation mechanisms of tsunamis and a catalogue of earthquakes associated with tsunamis. Proceedings of Tsunami Meetings Associated with the Tenth Pacific Science Congress, pp.7–18, IntUnion of Geodand Geophys,Paris, 1963

  • Iwatate T, Aydan Ö (2011) Characteristics of strong motions induced by the 2011 East Japan mega earthquake with an emphasis on Tokyo Bay Area. First International Conference on geotechnique, construction materials and environment, Mie, Japan, Paper No.119, 511–516

  • Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) (2011) http://www.jma.go.jp/

  • Joyner WB, Boore DM (1981) Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records from the 1979 Imperial Valley California Earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71(6):2011–2038

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori H (1983) Global seismicity. In: Kanamori H, Boschi E (eds) Earthquakes: observation, theory and interpretation. North-Holland, New York, pp 596–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Keefer DK (1984) Landslides caused by earthquakes. Geol Soc Am Bull 95(2):406–421

    Google Scholar 

  • KiK-net (2011) http://www.kik.bosai.go.jp/kik/

  • K-NET (2011) http://www.kyoshin.bosai.go.jp/kyoshin/

  • Koketsu K (2012) Seismological and geodetic aspects of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and Great East Japan Disaster. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering lessons learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, Tokyo, 1–8

  • Kuribayashi E, Tatsuoka F (1975) Brief review of soil liquefaction during earthquakes in Japan. Soils Found 15(4):81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda T (1975) The magnitude and periodicity of earthquakes from active faults. JISHIN 28:269–283 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida N, Esaki T, Aoki K, Kameda K (1984) Evaluation and prediction of subsidence in old working areas and practical and preventive measures against mining damage to new structures. Proceedings of Third International Symposium on land subsidence, Venice, edited by A. I. Johnson, Laura Carbognin and L. Ubertini, International Association of Hydraulic Sciences. 717–725

  • Port Authority Research Institute.(PARI) (2011) Special web site for East Japan mega earthquake. http://www.pari.go.jp/info/tohoku-eq/

  • Sato R (1989) Handbook on parameters of earthquake faults in japan. Kajima Pub Co., Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajima F, Mori J, Kennett BLN (2013) A review of the 2011 Tohoku–Oki earthquake (Mw 9.0): large-scale rupture across heterogeneous plate coupling. Tectonophysics 586:15–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toda S, Stein RSRS (2013) The 2011 M = 9.0 Tohoku oki earthquake more than doubled the probability of large shocks beneath Tokyo. Geophys Res Letts 40:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udias A (1999) Principles of seismology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 475

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulusay R, Tuncay E, Sonmez E, Gokceoglu C (2004) An attenuation relationship based on Turkish strong motion data and iso-acceleration map of Turkey. Eng Geol 74:265–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakamatsu K (2000), Liquefaction history, 416–1997, Japan. Proceedings of 12th World Conference on earthquake engineering, Paper No. 2270, p 8

  • Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationship among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84(4):974–1002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ömer Aydan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aydan, Ö. A critical testing of the applicability of some empirical relations used in the science and engineering of earthquakes through the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74, 1243–1254 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0699-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-014-0699-0

Keywords

Navigation