Abstract
Considerable attention has been devoted to how home smoke alarms could be more effective at preventing fire deaths. The death rate per 100 reported home fires is half as high in homes with working smoke alarms compared to homes without this protection. This paper summarizes what is known about the performance and effectiveness of home smoke alarms and of victim characteristics in home fires with and without operating smoke alarms based on statistical analysis of actual fire experience data. Special studies on other factors affecting smoke alarm performance, audibility, and nuisance alarms are also discussed. The paper also identifies several questions that cannot, at present, be conclusively addressed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
National fire incident reporting system 5.0 complete reference guide, U.S. Fire Administration National Fire Data Center Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Emmitsburg, MD 2006
Hall J Jr, Harwood B (1989) The national estimates approach to U.S. fire statistics. Fire Technol 25(2):99–113
Aerospace Corporation (1977) Survey and analysis of occupant-installable smoke detectors. Washington, DC
Elrick and Lavidge, Inc., (1980) A detector in every other home: results of a survey of smoke and fire detector owners: full report, prepared for federal emergency management agency, Atlanta
US Fire Administration (1983) Residential smoke and fire detector coverage in the united states: findings from a 1982 survey. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC
Prevention Index series based on surveys done by Louis Harris and Associates were used for 1983–1995 estimates
1997 Fire Awareness Survey for NFPA, 1999 NFPA National Fire Escape Survey, and 2004 Fire Prevention Week survey for NFPA
U.S. Census Bureau (2004) Housing and household economic statistics division “historical census of housing tables: telephones”
Smith C (1993) Smoke detector operability survey—report on findings. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD
Peek-Asa C, Allareddy V, Yan J, Taylor C, Lundell J, Zwerling C (2005) When one is not enough: prevalence and characteristics of homes not adequately protected by smoke alarms. Inj Prev 11(11):364–368. doi:10.1136/ip.2005.009175
Lee A, Midgett J, White S (2004) A review of the sound effectiveness of residential smoke alarms. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
Lee A The audibility of smoke alarms in residential homes, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD, September 2005, revised January 2007
Bruck D (2001) The who, what, where and why of waking to fire alarms: a review. Fire Safety J 36:623–639
Bruck D, Reid S, Kouzma J, Ball M (2004) The effectiveness of different alarms in waking sleeping children. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on human behavior in fire 2004, London, England, Interscience Communications Limited, pp 279–289
Ball M, Bruck D (2004) The effect of alcohol upon response to fire alarm signals in sleeping adults. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on human behavior in fire 2004, London, England, Interscience Communications Limited, pp 291–301
Bruck D, Thomas I, Kritikos A (2006) Investigation of auditory arousal with different alarm signals in sleeping older adults. The Fire Protection Research Foundation, Quincy, MA, pp 7–9
Smith C (1993) Smoke detector operability survey—report on findings. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD
Fazzini T, Perkins R, Grossman D (2000) Ionization and photoelectric smoke alarms in rural alaskan homes. West J Med 173:89–92
Bukowski R, Peacock R, Averill J, Cleary T, Bryner N, Walton W, Reneke P, Kuligowski E (2004) NIST technical note 1455, performance of home smoke alarms: analysis of the response of several available technologies in residential fire settings. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington, DC, p 250
Rowland D, GiGuisseppi C, Roberts I, Curtis K, Roberts H, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Wade A (2002) Prevalence of working smoke alarms in local authority inner city housing: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 325:998–1001 doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7371.998
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2006) Fires in the home: findings from the 2004/05 survey of english housing, London, UK
Bukowski R, Peacock R, Averill J, Cleary T, Bryner N, Walton W, Reneke P, Kuligowski E (2004) NIST technical note 1455, performance of home smoke alarms: analysis of the response of several available technologies in residential fire settings. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington, DC, pp xix–xxii, 248–249
Remembering when™: a fire and fall prevention program for older adults conference, Boston, December 2–4, 2007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahrens, M. Home Smoke Alarms: The Data as Context for Decision. Fire Technol 44, 313–327 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-008-0045-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-008-0045-9