Abstract
Most studies of graduate school socialization utilize samples of either current students or recent graduates. This study investigates how professors, established in their academic careers, retrospectively view their graduate training by asking and examining what deficiencies they detect from this preparatory stage. The sample is composed of academics at different stages of their careers, who work in a spectrum of institutional types in the US system of higher education. Four analytic dimensions are used to examine variation in which professors identify deficiencies in their graduate training: time (as indicated by career stage), employing institution, Ph.D. institution, and publication productivity. The findings cast additional light on socialization by suggesting how academics, differentially situated in an academic career, view their graduate education years after it has concluded.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, P. D., & Long, J. S. (1990). Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review, 55, 469–478.
Allison, P. D., Long, J. S., & Krauze, T. K. (1982). Cumulative advantage and inequality in science. American Sociological Review, 47, 615–625.
Allison, P. D., & Stewart, J. A. (1974). Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage. American Sociological Review, 39, 596–606.
Anderson, M. S. (Ed.). (1998). The experience of being in graduate school. San Francisco, CA: Josser-Bass.
Antony, J. S. (2002). Reexamining doctoral student socialization and professional development: Moving beyond the congruence and assimilation orientation. In J. C. Smart & W. G. Tierney (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 349–380). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Austin, A. E. (2002a). Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 94–122.
Austin, A. E. (2002b). Creating a bridge to the future: Preparing new faculty to face changing expectations in a shifting context. Review of Higher Education, 26, 119–144.
Austin, A. E. (2010). Reform efforts in STEM doctoral education: Strengthening preparation for scholarly careers. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 91–128). Dordrecht: Springer.
Austin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 397–456). Dordrecht: Springer.
Baldwin, R. G., Lunceford, C. J., & Vanderlinden, K. E. (2005). Faculty in the middle years: Illuminating an overlooked phase of academic life. Review of Higher Education, 29, 97–118.
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (Eds.). (1990). Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Becker, H. S., Geer, B., Hughes, E. C., & Strauss, A. L. (1961). Boys in White: Student culture in medical school. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bieber, J. P., & Worley, L. K. (2006). Conceptualizing the academic life: Graduate students’ perspectives. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 1009–1035.
Bosk, C. L. (1979). Forgive and remember: Managing medical failure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Braxton, J. M., & Baird, L. L. (2001). Preparation for professional self-regulation. Journal of Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 593–610.
Braxton, J. M., & Hargens, L. L. (1996). Variation among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 11, pp. 1–46). New York, NY: Agathon.
Ehrenberg, R. G., & Kuh, C. (Eds.). (2009). Doctoral education and the faculty of the future. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Ehrenberg, R. G., Zuckerman, H., Groen, J. A., & Brucker, S. M. (2009). Educating scholars: Doctoral education in the humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fox, M. F., & Stephan, P. (2001). Careers of young scientists: Preferences, prospects, and realities by gender and field. Social Studies of Science, 31, 109–122.
Goldberger, M. L., Maher, B. A., & Flattau, P. E. (Eds.). (1995). Research–doctorate programs in the United States: Continuity and change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts.
Golde, C. M., & Walker, G. E. (Eds.). (2006). Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing Stewards of the discipline. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hargens, L. (1975). Patterns of scientific research: A comparative analysis of research in three fields. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
Hermanowicz, J. C. (1998). The stars are not enough: Scientists—Their passions and professions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hermanowicz, J. C. (2009). Lives in science: How institutions affect academic careers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hermanowicz, J. C. (2012). The sociology of academic careers: Problems and prospects. In J. C. Smart & M. B. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 207–248). Dordrecht: Springer.
Horta, H. (2009). Holding a post-doctoral position before becoming a faculty member: Does it bring benefits for the scholarly enterprise? Higher Education, 58, 689–721.
Jones, L. V., Lindzey, G., & Coggeshall, P. E. (Eds.). (1982). An assessment of research–doctorate programs in the United States: Mathematical and physical sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Long, J. S. (1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific career. American Sociological Review, 43, 889–908.
Long, J. S., Allison, P. D., & McGinnis, R. (1979). Entrance into the academic career. American Sociological Review, 44, 816–830.
Merton, R. K. (1977). The sociology of science: An episodic memoir. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Merton, R. K., Reader, G. G., & Kendall, P. (Eds.). (1957). The student–physician: Introductory studies in the sociology of medical education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Morrison, E., Rudd, E., Zumeta, W., & Nerad, M. (2011). What matters for excellence in PhD programs? Latent constructs of doctoral program quality used by early career social scientists. Journal of Higher Education, 82, 535–563.
Nerad, M., Rebecca, A., & Joseph, C. (2004). ‘So You Want to be a Professor!’ Lessons from the PhDs—Ten years later study. In Donald. H. Wulff, A. E. Austin, et al. (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate (pp. 137–158). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Nettles, M. T., & Millett, C. M. (2006). Three magic letters: Getting to Ph.D. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Neumann, A. (2009). Professing to learn: Creating tenured lives and careers in the American Research University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Reskin, B. F. (1977). Scientific productivity and the reward structure of science. American Sociological Review, 42, 491–504.
Stephan, P., & Ma, J. (2005). The increased frequency and duration of the postdoctoral career stage. American Economic Review, 95, 71–75.
Walker, G. E., Golde, C. M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A. C., & Hutchings, P. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York, NY: Free Press.
Zuckerman, H. (1988). The sociology of science. In N. J. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp. 511–574). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hermanowicz, J.C. Faculty perceptions of their graduate education. High Educ 72, 291–305 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9955-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9955-x