Skip to main content
Log in

Transition Best Practice: Who is Responsible for Preparing our Educators to Promote Transition Related Best Practice?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Graduate students taking a class on transition for students with disabilities surveyed personnel of school districts in which they lived and worked to determine if the districts were engaging in transition best practices. Ten school districts in Southeast Texas were surveyed. The majority of these districts did not engage in transition best practices. There was a gap between what was being taught in the graduate class and what was actually happening in the public school classrooms. Implications for educator preparation programs and public school professional development programs are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agran, M., Blanchard, C., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2000). Promoting transition goals and self-determination through student self-directed learning: The self-determined learning model of instruction. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35(4), 351–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agran, M., Snow, K., & Swaner, J. (1999). Teacher Perceptions of self-determination: benefits, characteristics, strategies. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34(3), 293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, S. (1996). A historical perspective on student involvement in the transition process: Toward a vision of self-determination for all students. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 19(2), 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, G. (2003). Best practices in Transition. In G. Greene & C. A. Kochhar-Bryant (Eds.), Pathways to successful transition for youth with disabilities. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, PL 101-476, 20 U.S.C. 1400 eq. seq.

  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, PL 105-17, 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.

  • Johnson, D. R., Stodden, R.A., Emanuel, E. J., Luecking, R., & Mack, M. (2002). Current challenges facing secondary education and transition services: What research tells us. Exceptional Children, 68(4), 519–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersh, M. E., & Masztal, N. B. (1998). An analysis of studies of collaboration between universities and K-12 schools. The Educational Forum, 62(3), 218–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. S. (1999). Constructing knowledge about teaching and learning in early childhood teacher education because of a partnership. Education, 119(3), 400–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, C. A., Baker, S. R., & Saddler, S. J. (2002). Self-Determination in Teacher Education, a model to facilitate transition planning for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 23(2), 82–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, C. A., Nathanson, R., Baker, S. R., & Tamura, R. (2002). Self-determination. What do special educators know and where do they learn it? Remedial and Special Education, 23(4), 242–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, C. A., Rogan, P., & Baker, S. R. (2001). Student involvement in transition planning: Unheard Voices. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36(1), 16–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehman, P., Everson, J. M., & Reid, D. H. (2001). Beyond programs and placements: Using person-centered practices to individualize the transition process and outcomes. In P. Wehman (Ed.), Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L. (1992). Self-determination and the education of students with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, 302–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L., Agran, M., & Hughes, C. (1998). Teaching self-determination to students with disabilities: Basic skills for successful transition. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L., Agran, M., & Hughes, C. (2000). A national survey of teacher's promotion of self-determination and student-directed learning. Journal of Special Education, 34(2), 58–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L., & Palmer, S. B. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38(2), 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L., & Schwartz, M. (1998). The self-determination focus of transition goals for students with mental retardation. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 21(1), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D., & Stecker, P. M. (2001). Student involvement in transition planning: Are we there yet? Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36(3), 293–303.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andria Young.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, A. Transition Best Practice: Who is Responsible for Preparing our Educators to Promote Transition Related Best Practice?. J Dev Phys Disabil 19, 41–50 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-007-9039-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-007-9039-7

Keywords

Navigation