Abstract
We study the multiqubit states and the corresponding minimal sets of dequantizers and quantizers, such that symbols of the operators (observables) obtained with the help of the dequantizers admit a physical interpretation; more precisely, the symbols can be measured in the experiments. We consider two types of such quantities: (i) the probabilities of spin projections onto certain directions and (ii) the mean values of these projections. We provide an explicit description of the systems of dequantizers and quantizers for both types of these quantities corresponding to N-qubit states. We show that, in view of such symbols, it is possible to represent the density matrices of the N-qubit states in the form of series expansion in terms of quantizers with the coefficients as measurable observables.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E. P. Wigner, Phys.Rev., 40, 749 (1932).
K. Husimi, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn., 22, 264 (1940).
Y. J. Kano, J. Math. Phys., 6, 1913 (1965).
R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. Lett., 10, 84 (1963).
E. C. G. Sudarshan, Phys. Rev. Lett., 10, 277 (1963).
S. L. Stratonovich, Sov. Phys. JETP, 4, 891 (1957).
J. Schwinger, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 46, 1401 (1960).
W. K. Wootters, IBM J. Res. Dev., 48, 99 (2004).
W. K. Wootters, Ann. Phys., 176, 1 (1987).
U. Leonhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett., 74, 4101 (1995).
U. Leonhardt, Phys. Rev. A, 53, 2998 (1996).
R. Asplund and G. Björk, Phys. Rev. A, 64, (2001) 012106.
K. S. Gibbons, M. J. Hoffman, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A, 70, 062101 (2004).
A. B. Klimov, J. L. Romero, G. Björk, and L. L. Sánchez-Soto, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 40, 3987 (2007).
G. Björk, J. L. Romero, A. B. Klimov, and L. L. Sánchez-Soto, arXiv:quant-ph/0608173v2 23 Aug 2006.
A. B. Klimov, J. L. Romero, G. Björk, and L. L. Sánchez-Soto, arXiv:quant-ph/0806.072v1 17 Nov 2008.
F. Lizzi and P. Vitale, SIGMA, 10, 086 (2014).
A. Vourdas, Acta Appl. Math., 93, 197 (2006).
P. Stóvicék and J. Tolar, Rep. Math. Phys., 20, 157 (1984).
S. Chaturvedi, E. Ercolessi, G. Marmo, et al., J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 39, 1405 (2006).
S. N. Filippov and V. I. Man’ko, Phys. Scripta, T143, 014010 (2011).
S. N. Filippov and V. I. Man’ko, Phys. Scripta, 83, 058101 (2011).
S. N. Filippov and V. I. Man’ko, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 32, 56 (2011).
F. Bayen, M. Flato, C. Fronsdal, et al., Lett. Math. Phys., 1, 521 (1977).
O. V. Man’ko, V. I. Man’ko, and G. Marmo, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 35, 699 (2002).
P. Adam, V. A. Andreev, I. Ghiu, et al., J. Russ. Laser Res., 35, 3 (2014).
P. Adam, V. A. Andreev, I. Ghiu, et al., J. Russ. Laser Res., 35, 427 (2014).
P. Adam, V. A. Andreev, A. Isar, et al., Theor. Math. Phys., 186, 346 (2016).
P. Adam, V. A. Andreev, A. Isar, et al., J. Russ. Laser Res., 37, 544 (2016).
P. Adam, V. A. Andreev, A. Isar, et al., Phys. Lett. A, 381, 2778 (2017).
P. Adam, V. A. Andreev, M. A. Man’ko, and V. I. Man’ko, J. Russ. Laser Res., 38, 491 (2017).
A. Weyl, Acta Math., 111, 143 (1964).
G. Folland, Harmonic Analysis in Phase Space, Princeton University Press (1989).
J. O’Neill, P. Flandrin, and W. Williams, IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 6, 304 (1999).
B. Boashash (Ed.), Time Frequency Signal Analysis and Processing. A Comprehensive Reference, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003).
M. Asorey, P. Facchi, V. I. Man’ko, et al., Phys. Scr., 90, 065101 (2015).
T Opartny, V. Bu\( \tilde{\mathrm{z}} \)ek, J. Bajer, and G. Drobny, Phys. Rev. A, 52, 2419 (1995).
M. A. Marchiolli, E. C. Silva, and D. Galetti, Phys. Rev. A, 79, 022114 (2009).
E. C. Silva and D. Galetti, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 13, 022114 (2009).
S. Mancini, V. I. Man’ko, and P. Tombesi, Quantum Semiclass. Opt., 7, 615 (1995).
S. Mancini, V. I. Man’ko, and P. Tombesi, Phys. Lett. A, 213, 1 (1996).
S. Mancini, V. I. Man’ko, and P. Tombesi, Found. Phys., 27, 801 (1997).
A. Ibort, V. I. Man’ko, G. Marmo, et al., Phys. Scr., 79, 065013 (2009).
V. V. Dodonov and V. I. Man’ko, Phys. Lett. A, 229, 335 (1997).
V. I. Man’ko and O. V. Man’ko, J. Exp. Theor. Phys., 85, 430 (1997).
V. A. Andreev and V. I. Man’ko, J. Exp. Theor. Phys., 87, 239 (1998).
V. A. Andreev, O. V. Man’ko, V. I. Man’ko, and S. S. Safonov, J. Russ. Laser Res., 19, 340 (1998).
V. I. Man’ko, G. Marmo, A. Simoni, and F. Ventriglia, Phys. Lett. A, 372, 6490 (2008).
G. M. D’Ariano, L. Maccone, and M. Paini, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt., 5, 77 (2003).
S. Weigert, Int. J. Mod. Phys., 20, 1942 (2006) .
J. P. Amiet and S. Weigert, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 32, 2777 (1999).
V. A. Andreev and V. I. Man’ko, JETP Lett., 72, 93 (2000).
V. A. Andreev and V. I. Man’ko, Phys. Lett. A, 254, 272 (2001).
V. A. Andreev, Theor. Math. Phys., 152, 1286 (2007).
V. A. Andreev, Theor. Math. Phys., 158, 196 (2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
*We dedicate this paper to the memory of Professor József Janszky, the Great Scientist and our friend and colleague with whom we were happy to collaborate during many years. A long time ago, Janszky initiated scientific collaboration between the Lebedev Physical Institute of the USSR Academy of Sciences and the Institute for Solid State Physics and Optics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. He was the founder of the Central European Workshop on Quantum Optics, the 25th meeting of which took place at the University of Balearic Islands (Palma de Mallorca, Spain, May 21–25, 2018), and the 26th meeting of which will take place in Paderborn, Germany, June 3–7, 2019.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adam, P., Andreev, V.A., Man’ko, M.A. et al. Symbols of Multiqubit States Admitting a Physical Interpretation*. J Russ Laser Res 39, 360–375 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-018-9730-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10946-018-9730-4