Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surface displacement estimation along Himalayan frontal fault using differential SAR interferometry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Himalayan region has been studied extensively during the past few decades in terms of present ongoing deformations. Various models have been proposed for the evolution of the Himalaya to explain the cause of earthquake occurrences and to understand the seismotectonics of the Himalayan collision zone. However, the information on displacements from field geodetic surveys is still too scarce in time and spatial domains so as to provide convincing evidences. Moreover, classical Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Approaches also fail due to paucity of data in higher magnitude range, thus emphasizing the need of spatial level displacement measurements. It is in this context that the present study has been carried out to estimate the surface displacement in a seismically active region of the Himalaya between Ganga and Yamuna Tear using Differential SAR interferometry. Three single-look complex images, obtained from ASAR sensor onboard ENVISAT satellite, have been used. A displacement rate of 8–10 mm per year in N15°E direction of Indian plate has been obtained in this three-pass SAR interferometry study. It has been noted that the estimated convergence rate using Differential SAR interferometry technique is relatively low in comparison with those obtained from previous classical studies. The reported low convergence rate may be due to occurrence of silent/quite earthquakes, aseismic slip, differential movement of Delhi Hardwar ridge, etc. Therefore, in view of the contemporary seismicity and conspicuous displacements, a study of long-term observations of this surface movement has been recommended in future through a time-series SAR interferometry analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avouac JP, Tapponnier P (1993) Kinematic model of active deformation in central Asia. Geophys Res Lett 20:895–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker DM, Lillie RJ, Yeats RS, Johnson GD, Yousuf M, Zamin ASH (1988) Development of the Himalayan frontal thrust zone: salt range, Pakistan. Geology 16:3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee P, Burgmann R (2002) Convergence across the northwest Himalaya from GPS measurements. Geophys Res Lett 29(13):1652–1655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechor NBD, Zebker HA (2006) Measuring two dimensional movements using a single InSAR pair. Geophys Res Lett 33(L1):6311–6316

    Google Scholar 

  • Besse J, Courtillot V (1988) Paleogeographic maps of the continents bordering the Indian Ocean since the early Jurassic. J Geophys Res 93(B10):11791–11808

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya A, Arora MK, Sharma ML (2012a) Usefulness of SAR interferometry for DEM generation and estimation of land surface displacement in Jharia coal field area. Geocarto Int 27(1):57–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya A, Arora MK, Sharma ML (2012b) Improved digital elevation model creation using SAR interferometry in plane and undulating terrains. Himalayan Geol 33(1):29–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R, Ambraseys N (2005) Apparent Himalayan slip deficit from the summation of seismic moments for Himalayan earthquakes 1500–2000. Curr Sci 88(10):1658–1663

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R, Gaur VK (2000) Geodetic contributions to the study of seismotectonics in India. Curr Sci 79(9):1259–1269

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R, Larson K, Freymueller J (1997) GPS measurements of present-day convergence across the Nepal Himalaya. Nature 386:61–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R, Blume F, Bendick R, Gaur VK (1998) Geodetic constraints on the translation and deformation of India, implications for future great Himalayan earthquakes. Curr Sci 74(3):213–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R, Gaur VK, Molnar P (2001) Himalayan seismic hazard. Science 293:1442–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgmann R, Ayhan ME, Fielding EJ, Wright TJ, McClusky S, Aktug B, Demir C, Lenk O, Turkezer A (2002) Deformation during the 12 November 1999 Düzce, Turkey, Earthquake, from GPS and InSAR Data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92(1):161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee RS, Fruneau B, Rudant JP, Roy PS, Frison PL, Lekhera RC, Dadhwal VK, Saha R (2006) Subsidence of Kolkata (Calcutta) city, India during the 1990 s as observed from space by differential synthetic aperture radar interferometry (D-InSAR) technique. Remote Sens Environ 102:176–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costantini M (1998) A novel phase unwrapping method based on network programming. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 36(3):813–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey JF, Cande S, Pitman WC (1989) The tectonic evolution of the India/Eurasia collision zone. Ecolgae Geologicae Halvetiae 82(3):717–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding XL, Li ZW, Zhu JJ, Feng GC, Long JP (2008) Atmospheric effects on InSAR measurements and their mitigation. Sensor 8:5426–5448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein RM, Werner CL (1998) Radar interferogram filtering for geophysical applications. Geophys Res Lett 25(21):4035–4038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanssen RF (2001) Radar Interferometry, data interpretation and error analysis. Kluwer Academic, Netherlands, pp 53–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ME, Bilham R (1994) 1991–1992 GPS measurements across the Nepal Himalaya. Geophys Res Lett 21(12):1169–1172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Just D, Bamler R (1994) Phase statistics of interferograms with applications to synthetic-aperture radar. Appl Opt 33(20):4361–4368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Wesnousky SG, Rockwell TK, Ragona D, Thakur VC, Seitz GG (2001) Earthquake recurrence and rupture dynamics of himalayan frontal thrust, India. Science 294:2328–2331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Wesnousky SG, Rockwell TK (2003) The Himalayan frontal thrust (HFT) is not blind. Earthquake geology in reverse faulting terrains, Seattle annual meeting, session 24, Washington, November 2–5

  • Kumar S, Wesnousky SG, Rockwell TK, Briggs RW, Thakur VC, Jayangondaperumal R (2006) Paleoseismic evidence of great surface rupture earthquakes along the Indian Himalaya. J Geophys Res 111(B3):B03304–B03322

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Wesnousky SG, Jayangondaperumal R, Nakata T, Kumahara Y, Singh V (2010) Paleoseismological evidence of surface faulting along the northeastern Himalayan front, India: timing, size, and spatial extent of great earthquakes. J Geophys Res 115(B1):B12422–B12441

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson KM, Burgmann R, Bilham R, Freymueller JT (1999) Kinematics of India Eurasia collision zone from GPS measurements. J Geophys Res 104(B1):1077–1093

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave J, Avouac JP (2000) Active folding of fluvial terraces across the Siwaliks Hills, Himalayas of central Nepal. J Geophys Res 105(B3):5735–5770

    Google Scholar 

  • Leathers M (1987) Balanced structural cross-section of the western Salt Range and Potwar Plateau: deformation near the strikeslip terminus of an overthrust sheet. M. S. thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 271 pp

  • Lyon-Caen H, Molnar P (1985) Gravity anomalies, flexture of the Indian plate, and the structure, support and evaluation of the Himalaya and Ganga Basin. Tectonics 4:513–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massonnet D, Rossi M, Carmona C, Adragna F, Peltzer G, Feigl K, Rabaute T (1993) The displacement field of the Landers earthquake mapped by radar Interferometry. Nature 364:138–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massonnet D, Feigl K, Rossi M, Adragna F (1994) Radar interferometric mapping of deformation in the year after the Landers earthquake. Nature 369:227–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnar P (1990) A review of the seismicity and the rates of active underthrusting and the deformation of the Himalaya. J Himalayan Geol 1:131–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni J, Barazangi M (1984) Seismotectonics of the Himalayan collision zone, geometry of the underthrusting Indian plate beneath the Himalaya. Geophys Res Lett 89(B2):1147–1163

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey MR, Tandukar RP, Avouac JP, Lave J, Massot JP (1995) Interseismic strain accumulation on the Himalayan crustal ramp (Nepal). Geophys Res Lett 22(7):751–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkash B, Rathor RS, Pati P, Rajendra PJ, Singh S (2011) Convergence rates along the Himalayan frontal thrust inferred from terraces at Chandidevi Temple Hill, Hardwar, Northwestern Himalaya. Curr Sci 100(9):1426–1432

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul J, Burgmann R, Gaur VK, Bilham R, Larson KM, Ananda MB, Jade S, Mukul M, Anupama TS, Satyal G, Kumar D (2001) The motion and active deformation of India. Geophys Res Lett 28(4):647–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers PM, Lillie RJ, Yeats RS (1998) Structure and shortening of the Kangra and Dehra Dun Reentrants, Sub-Himalaya, India. Geol Soc Am Bull 110:1010–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramli HK (2007) Generation and evaluation of digital elevation model derived through spaceborne synthetic aperture radar interferometry. Masters Thesis, University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia

  • Rao YS, Rao KS, Venkataraman G, Khare M, Reddy CD (2003) Comparison and fusion of DEMs derived from INSAR and optical stereo techniques. In: Third ESA international workshop on ERS SAR interferometry, Dec 1–5, Frascati, Italy

  • Rufino G, Moccia A, Esposito S (1998) DEM generation by means of ERS tandem data. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 36(6):1905–1992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satyabala SP, Bilham R (2006) Surface deformation and subsurface slip of the 28 March 1999 Mw = 6.4 west Himalayan Chamoli earthquake from InSAR analysis. Geophys Res Lett 33:L23305–L23309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeber L, Armbruster JG (1981) Great detachment earthquakes along Himalayan arc and long term forecasting. In: Simpson DW, Richards PG (eds) Earthquake prediction: an international review. Maurice Ewing series, American Geophysical. Union, Washington, United States, pp 259–277

  • Sharma ML, Lindholm C (2010) Use of characteristics earthquake recurrence modelling for Himalayan frontal fault (HFF) in estimating the earthquake hazard assessment for Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. In: Proceedings of 14th symposium of earthquake engineering (SEE), IIT Roorkee, vol 1, pp 1323–1334

  • Small D, Werner C, Nuesch D (1993) Baseline Modelling for ERS-1 SAR Interferometry. IEEE Int Geosci Remote Sens Symp 3:1204–1206

    Google Scholar 

  • Sridevi J (2004) Estimates of plate velocity and crustal deformation in the Indian subcontinent using GPS geodesy. Curr Sci 86(10):1443–1448

    Google Scholar 

  • Strozzi T, Wegmuller U (1999) Land subsidence in Mexico City mapped by ERS differential SAR interferometry. IEEE Int Geosci Remote Sens Sympo 4:1940–1942

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur VC (2004) Active tectonics of Himalayan frontal thrust and seismic hazard to Ganga plain. Curr Sci 86(11):1554–1560

    Google Scholar 

  • Usai S (2001) A new approach for long term monitoring of deformations by differential SAR interferometry. PhD Thesis, Delft University Press, pp 21–24

  • Wegmuller U, Werner C (1997) Gamma SAR processor and interferometry software. Third ERS Scientific Symposium, Florence, Italy, pp 1687–1692

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesnousky SG, Kumar S, Mohindra R, Thakur VC (1999) Uplift and convergence along the Himalayan Frontal Thrust of India. Tectonics 18(6):967–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright TJ, Lu Z, Wicks C (2003) Source model for the Mw 6.7, 23rd October 2002, Nenana Mountain earthquake (Alaska) from InSAR. Geophys Res Lett 30(18):1974–1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Zebker HA, Goldstein RM (1986) Topographic mapping from interferometric synthetic aperture radar observation. J Geophys Res 91(B5):4993–4999

    Google Scholar 

  • Zebker HA, Rosen PA, Goldstein RM, Gabriel A, Werner CL (1994) On the derivation of coseismic displacement fields using differential radar interferometry: the landers earthquake. J Geophys Res 99(B10):19617–19634

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Q, Li Y, Li X (2007) Correction of topospheric water vapor effect on ASAR interferogram using synchronous MERIS data. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Barcelona, Spain, pp 2086–2089

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The SAR images have been procured by Eurimage S.p.A Club, Rome, Italy for the research work. The processing has been done on GAMMA_ISP/DIFF_GEO software procured under Department of Science and Technology (DST) funded research scheme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atanu Bhattacharya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhattacharya, A., Sharma, M.L. & Arora, M.K. Surface displacement estimation along Himalayan frontal fault using differential SAR interferometry. Nat Hazards 64, 1105–1123 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0292-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0292-4

Keywords

Navigation