Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of parenteral nutrition use in patients undergoing major upper gastro-intestinal surgery

  • Short Research Report
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background After major upper gastro-intestinal surgery, enteral feeding is often hampered. There is still no consensus on which route of nutrition is preferable in patients undergoing this type of surgery. Current ESPEN guidelines recommend parenteral nutrition in undernourished patients, if caloric requirements cannot be met orally/enterally within 7 days and enteral nutrition is contraindicated. Objective The current practice of systematic parenteral nutrition at the thoracic surgery ward of the University Hospitals Leuven was evaluated based on the ESPEN guidelines. Method This prospective observational study included patients undergoing upper gastro-intestinal surgery and receiving postoperative parenteral nutrition. Parenteral nutrition use was considered appropriate when patients were undernourished and unable to obtain adequate caloric requirements by oral or enteral feeding within 7 days. Results Twenty-five out of 35 patients were nutritionally at risk. In 9 of 25 patients, the indication for parenteral nutrition was considered justified. As the intestinal tract below the anastomosis site remains accessible in the total studied population, enteral nutrition might be an option. Unfortunately, an appropriate jejunostomy tube was not available at our institution. Conclusion In accordance to the ESPEN guidelines, enteral nutrition can replace parenteral nutrition in most thoracic surgery patients, but only if an appropriate enteral access is available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Alivizatos V, Gavala V, Alexopoulos P, Apostolopoulos A, Bajrucevic S. Feeding tube-related complications and problems in patients receiving long-term home enteral nutrition. Indian J Palliat Care. 2012;18(1):31–3.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tapia J, Murguia R, Garcia G, de los Monterols PE, Oñate E. Jejunostomy: techniques, indications, and complications. World J Surg. 1999;23(6):596–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Seike J, Tangoku A, Yuasa Y, Okitsu H, Kawakami Y, Sumitomo M. The effect of nutritional support on the immune function in the acute postoperative period after oesophageal cancer surgery: total parenteral nutrition versus enteral nutrition. J Med Invest. 2011;58(1–2):75–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Xiao-Bo Y, Qiang L, Xiong Q, Zheng R, Jian Z, Jian-Hua Z, et al. Efficacy of early postoperative enteral nutrition in supporting patients after esophagectomy. Minerva Chir. 2014;69(1):37–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujita T, Daiko H, Nishimura M. Early enteral nutrition reduces the rate of life-threatening complications after thoracic oesophagectomy in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur Surg Res. 2012;48(2):79–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Braga M, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P, Fearon K, Weimann A, Bozzetti F. ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: surgery. Clin Nutr. 2009;28(4):378–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z, Ad hoc Espen Working Group 1. Nutritional risk screening (NRS-2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr. 2003;22(3):321–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weimann A, Braga M, Harsanyi L, Laviano A, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: surgery including organ transplantation. Clin Nutr. 2006;25(2):224–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No special funding was received for this study.

Conflicts of interest

None of the authors have financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Deleenheer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deleenheer, B., Declercq, P., Van Veer, H. et al. Evaluation of parenteral nutrition use in patients undergoing major upper gastro-intestinal surgery. Int J Clin Pharm 37, 579–582 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0099-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-015-0099-y

Keywords

Navigation