Skip to main content
Log in

Intercultural (Mis)Communication: Why Would You “Out” Me in Class?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper conceptualizes Hopson’s notion of crash moments by exploring an intercultural interaction (between an individual who identifies as heterosexual and another who identifies as homosexual) within a graduate classroom by drawing on cultural schema theory and critical incident analysis. Ultimately, this paper deconstructs a communication breakdown through a self-reflexive process in which the researcher was “outed” (someone else disclosed the sexual orientation of a lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgendered individual in a public setting) by a classmate—which the researcher deems as a problematic occurrence, making the incident critical and fitting for analysis within an intercultural communication context. This paper also considers the complexities of sexual identity negotiation as an African American female lesbian at a Historically Black College/University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abes, E. S., & Kasch, D. (2007). Using queer theory to explore lesbian college students’ multiple dimensions of identity. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 619–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augoustinos, M., & Walker, I. (1995). Social cognition: An integrated introduction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle Bell, G. (2010). “WHAT is SHE doing here—and WHAT did SHE say SHE studies?:” Exploring conflicting schemas associated with White skin in the graduate classroom. MOSAIC, 3(1), 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. (2008). Autoethnography as method. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, E. (1985). Developmental stages of the coming out process. In J. C. Gonsiorek (Ed.), A guide to psychotherapy with gay and lesbian clients (pp. 31–43). New York: Harrington Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. A. (1991). In defense of everyday memory. American Psychologist, 46, 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. M. (2003). What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychological Review, 110, 173–192.

  • Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, F. J., & Stein, T. S. (2002). Sexual orientation identity formation among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths: Multiple patterns of milestone. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12(2), 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldeman, D. C. (2007). The village people: Identity and development in the gay male community. In K. J. Bieschke, R. M. Perez, & K. A. DeBord (Eds.), Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender clients (2nd ed., pp. 71–89). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, N. (2009). Affirmative practice and alternative sexual orientations: Helping clients navigate the coming out process. Clinical Social Work Journal, 37(4), 346–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopson, M. C. (2008). Now watch me dance: Responding to critical observations, constructions, and performance of race on reality television. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 25(4), 441–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopson, M. C. (2009). Teaching and learning through crash moments. Mosaic: A Journal of Original Research on Multicultural Education, Teaching, and Learning, 1, 34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, S. (2009). HIV-related behaviors among black students attending Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) versus white students attending a traditionally white institution (TWI). Aids Care, 21, 1050–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, S. C. (2011). Breaking the silence: An autoethnography of a single, Black, lesbian’s interpersonal relationships at an HBCU. In E. Gilchrists (Ed.) Experiences of single African-American women professors: With this Ph.D., I Thee Wed. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

  • Howard, S. C., & Lewis, M. (2011). African American lesbians watching the ‘L Word’: Audience research. In T. Morrison, M. Morrison, M. Carrigan & D. McDermott (Eds.) Sexual minority research in the New Millineum. New York: Nova.

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1963). Critique of pure reason (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McVee, M., Dunsmore, K., & Gavelek, J. (2005). Scheme theory revisted. Review of Educational Research, 75, 531–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida, H. (1999). A cognitive approach to intercultural communication based on schema theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 753–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida, H. (2005). Cultural schema theory. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbe, M. P., & Hopson, M. C. (2002). Looking at the front door: Exploring images of the Black male on MTV’s The Real World. In J. N. Martin, T. K. Nakayama, & L. A. Flores’s (Eds.), Reading in intercultural communication: Experiences and contexts (pp. 219–226). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

  • Reynolds, A. L., & Hanjorgiris, W. F. (2000). Coming out: Lesbian, gay, and bisexual identity development. In R. M. Perez, K. A. DeBord, & K. J. Bieschke (Eds.), Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients (pp. 35–55). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roppolo, K. (2003). Symbolic racism, history, and reality: The real problem with Indian mascots. In M. Moore’s (Eds.), Genocide of the mind: New Native American writing (pp. 187–199). New York, NY: Thunder’s Mouth Press/Nation Books.

  • Rosario, M., Hunter, J., Maguen, S., Gwadz, M., & Smith, R. (2001). The coming-out process and its adaptational and health-related associations among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths: Stipulation and exploration of a model. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(1), 113–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Williams, R. C. (2005). The new gay teenager. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Savin-Williams, R. C. (2006).

  • Tripp, D. (1993). Critical incidents in teaching: Developing professional judgement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troiden, R. R. (1989). The formation of homosexual identities. In G. Herdt (Ed.), Gay and lesbian youth (pp. 43–73). New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungar, M. (2000). State violence and lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (lgbt) rights. New Political Science, 22, 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, L. D. (2002). Out in the academy: Heterosexism, invisibility, and double consciousness. College English, 65, 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheena C. Howard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howard, S.C. Intercultural (Mis)Communication: Why Would You “Out” Me in Class?. Sexuality & Culture 16, 118–133 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-011-9112-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-011-9112-3

Keywords

Navigation