Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Risk Factors Associated with Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication of colorectal surgery as it greatly increases morbidity and mortality and has been associated with augmented local recurrence and diminished survival. Many risk factors have been identified to date, but sizable studies on AL after colorectal resection are lacking. This study aimed to identify the risk factors and postoperative complications of AL after colorectal surgery in the first affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. One thousand two hundred seventy-five patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery between January 2010 and June 2013 were retrospectively studied. Twelve preoperative, 17 operative, and 11 postoperative variables were examined by the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for univariate analysis and were then further examined by multivariate logistic regression analysis, among which one operative and three postoperative variables were examined in 426 rectal cancer surgeries. Additionally, eight postoperative complications and short-term prognostic variables were also examined by the chi-square test or a Fisher’s exact test. AL was identified in 60/1158 (5.2%) total patients, 20/732 (2.7%), and 40/426 (9.4%) of whom had colonic and rectal cancer, respectively. Univariate analysis identified preoperative variables: sex (p = 0.012), preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (p < 0.001), and hemoglobin level (p = 0.089); operative variables: surgical time (p = 0.009), anastomotic methods (p = 0.003), surgical staging (p = 0.016), and operative sites (p < 0.001); and postoperative pathologic variables: distance from tumor to distal incisional margin (p < 0.001). For rectal cancer, the variables included rectal procedures (p = 0.022), rectal segments (p = 0.010), distance from the tumor to the dentate line (p = 0.011) and total mesorectal excision (TME) (p = 0.046). All of these variables were included in the multivariate analysis, which identified the surgical time (p = 0.021), preoperative CEA level ≥ 41 μg/L (p < 0.001), and double-stapled anastomosis (p = 0.007); for rectal cancer, the middle or lower rectal segment (p = 0.008, 0.005, respectively) was included as an independent predictive factor for AL. Of the eight postoperative complications or short-term prognostic variables, postoperative hospital stay, abdominal infection, urologic infection, and incisional infection were considered significant. The rate of AL after rectal cancer is much higher than that of colon cancer. Surgical time, tumor biomarkers, anastomotic methods, and rectal segments may have the potential to increase the occurrence of AL. Additionally, AL may increase patients’ hospital costs, length of stay and other relevant complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kube R, Mroczkowski P, Granowski D, Benedix F, Sahm M, Schmidt U, Gastinger I, Lippert H (2010) Anastomotic leakage after colon cancer surgery: a predictor of significant morbidity and hospital mortality, and diminished tumour-free survival. Eur J Surg Oncol 36(2):120–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Krarup PM, Jorgensen LN, Andreasen AH, Harling H, Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (2012) Danish Colorectal Cancer Group: a nationwide study on anastomotic leakage after colonic cancer surgery. Color Dis 14(10):e661–e667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Milsom JW, de Oliveira O Jr, Trencheva KI, Pandey S, Lee SW, Sonoda T (2009) Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing curative laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 52(7):1215–1222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P (2011) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253(5):890–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burton TP, Mittal A, Soop M (2013) Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and anastomotic dehiscence in bowel surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 56(1):126–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Morris EJ, Taylor EF, Thomas JD, Quirke P, Finan PJ, Coleman MP, Rachet B, Forman D (2011) Thirty-day postoperative mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in England. Gut 60(6):806–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Targarona EM, Balague C, Pernas JC, Martinez C, Berindoague R, Gich I, Trias M (2008) Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy. Ann Surg 247(4):642–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang L, Huang XE, Zhou JN (2013) Risk assessment on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: an analysis of 753 patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14(7):4447–4453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schouten SB, De Bruin AF, Gosselink MP, Nigg AL, van Iterson M, Biermann K, Kliffen M, van der Harst E (2014) Is microvessel density correlated with anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection? Hepato-Gastroenterology 61(129):90–93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun LC, Chu KS, Cheng SC, Lu CY, Kuo CH, Hsieh JS, Shih YL, Chang SJ, Wang JY (2009) Preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen, albumin and age are supplementary to UICC staging systems in predicting survival for colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment. BMC Cancer 9:288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gara S, Meziou S, Mtar A, Ghanem A, Harzallah L, Rahal K, Boussen H, Guemira F (2012) Prognostic value of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level in colorectal cancer in Tunisia. Tunis Med 90(1):41–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ikeda T, Kumashiro R, Taketani K, Ando K, Kimura Y, Saeki H, Oki E, Morita M, Akahoshi T, Hashizume M, Maehara Y (2015) Endoscopic evaluation of clinical colorectal anastomotic leakage. J Surg Res 193(1):126–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, Parry BR, Merrie A, Fitzgerald A (2011) Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (9):CD004320. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004320.pub3

  15. Kim HJ, Choi GS, Park JS, Park SY (2013) Comparison of intracorporeal single-stapled and double-stapled anastomosis in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a case-control study. Int J Color Dis 28(1):149–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Norstein J, Haffner J, Wiig JN, Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group (2005) Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Color Dis 7(1):51–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Saha AK, Chowdhury F, Jha AK, Chatterjee S, Das A, Banu P (2014) Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation before colorectal surgery: a randomized prospective trial in a tertiary care institute. J Nat Sci Biol Med 5(2):421–424

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang L, Huang XE, Xu L, Zhou X, Zhou JN, Yu DS, Li DZ, Guan X (2013) Acidic pelvic drainage as a predictive factor for anastomotic leakage after surgery for patients with rectal cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 14(9):5441–5447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ, van de Velde CJ, Dutch ColorectalCancer Group (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92(2):211–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Valentijn TM, Galal W, Tjeertes EK, Hoeks SE, Verhagen HJ, Stolker RJ (2013) The obesity paradox in the surgical population. Surgeon 11(3):169–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Iancu C, Mocan LC, Todea-Iancu D, Mocan T, Acalovschi I, Ionescu D, Zaharie FV, Osian G, Puia CI, Muntean V (2008) Host-related predictive factors for anastomotic leakage following large bowel resections for colorectal cancer. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 17(3):299–303

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Law WL, Choi HK, Lee YM, Ho JW, Seto CL (2007) Anastomotic leakage is associated with poor long-term outcome in patients after curative colorectal resection for malignancy. J Gastrointest Surg 11(1):8–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW (2006) Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum 49(11):1719–1725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A (2014) Epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a nationwide analysis of use and outcomes. JAMA Surg 149(2):130–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lipska MA, Bissett IP, Parry BR, Merrie AE (2006) Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk. ANZ J Surg 76(7):579–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tang R, Chen HH, Wang YL, Changchien CR, Chen JS, Hsu KC, Chiang JM, Wang JY (2001) Risk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection of the colon and rectum: a single center prospective study of 2,809 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 234(2):181–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Shrikhande SV, Gaikwad V, Desouza A, Goel M (2014) Is laparoscopic surgery the standard of care for GI luminal Cancer? Indian J Surg 76(6):444–452

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jorgensen T, Harling H, Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (2010) Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Color Dis 12(1):37–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith JD, Butte JM, Weiser MR, D’Angelica MI, Paty PB, Temple LK, Guillem JG, Jarnagin WR, Nash GM (2013) Anastomotic leak following low anterior resection in stage IV rectal cancer is associated with poor survival. Ann Surg Oncol 20(8):2641–2646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mrak K, Eberl T, Laske A, Jagoditsch M, Fritz J, Tschmelitsch J (2013) Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival after resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 56(1):20–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This paper presents independent research funded by the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (project number: 2010B080701106). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Xiaojiang Yi

  2. Department of General Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Zhongshan City, Zhongshan, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Yueming Huang

  3. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Gastrointestinal Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No 58, Zhongshan 2th Road, 510080, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Yulong He & Chuangqi Chen

Authors
  1. Xiaojiang Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yueming Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yulong He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chuangqi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuangqi Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yi, X., Huang, Y., He, Y. et al. Risk Factors Associated with Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Cancer. Indian J Surg 81, 154–163 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-018-1757-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-018-1757-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation