Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quality Attributes of Sweet Sorghum for the Large-Scale Production of Bioproducts: A 1-Year Comparison of Commercial Hybrids and a Cultivar

  • Research article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality attributes of sweet sorghum affect the industrial processing of this biomass into biofuels and bioproducts. In a 1-year study, two commercial sweet sorghum hybrids 105 and 106, late and early maturing, respectively, were compared to inbred, later-maturing Top 76-6 cultivar, for quality attributes at the soft dough (SD) and hard dough (HD) maturity stages. Crops were grown in South Louisiana, and juice was extracted from topped whole stalks by roller milling. Crop biomass yields varied (P < 0.05) with 105 > Top 76-6 > 106, with hybrid 106 containing markedly more auxiliary seed head/stalk (side-branch tillers) compared to none in hybrid 105 and only 0.5% in Top 76-6 at HD. For the three genotypes, the stalk contributed between 63.8 and 86.5% of the fresh weight biomass which decreased from SD to HD. The growth parameters of crop yield, and stalk biomass, height, wet weight, first internode diameter, and to a lesser degree hardness of the last internode were strongly, negatively correlated with both soluble and insoluble starch in the raw juice. This suggested that increased growth/maturity of the genotypes tended to reduce starch. Overall, except for significantly (P < 0.05) lower mode values in the hybrids compared to Top 76-6, there were little statistical differences in starch granule size parameters. Further studies are now warranted to ascertain environmental effects on quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrzejewski, B., G. Eggleston, S. Lingle, and R. Powell. 2013a. Development of a sweet sorghum juice clarification method in the manufacture of industrial feedstocks for value-added products. Industrial Crops and Products 44: 77–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andrzejewski, B., G. Eggleston, and R. Powell. 2013b. Pilot plant clarification of sweet sorghum juice and evaporation of raw and clarified juices. Industrial Crops and Products 49: 648–658.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Audilakshmi, S., A. Mall, M. Swarnalathm, and N. Seetharama. 2010. Inheritence of sugar concentration in stalk (Brix), sucrose content, stalk and juice yield in sorghum. Biomass and Bioenergy 34: 813–820.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bala Ravi, S., P. Biswas, and C. Ratnavathi. 1996. Advances in value addition of Kharif sorghum. Crop Improvement 23: 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhead, D. 1972. Effect of planting date and maturity on juice quality of Rio sweet sorghum. Crop Science 13: 389–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., G. Eggleston, A. Gilbert, and Y. Chung. 2014. Development of a research method to measure insoluble and soluble starch in sugarcane factory and refinery products. In Proceedings of the 2014 sugar industry technologists meeting, Canada, LXXIII, 212–229.

  • Cole, M., G. Eggleston, E. Petrie, M. Uchimiya, and C. Dalley. 2017. Genotype and maturity effects on the quality attributes and ethanol potential of sweet sorghum. Biomass and Bioenergy 96: 183–192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deitz, V., F. Carpenter, C. Rieger, and H. Rootare. 1959. The influence on pH on some properties of char liquors. Bone Char Research Project Technical Report, No. 53.

  • Downes, R. 1996. The effect of temperature on tillering of grain sorghum seedlings. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19: 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earp, C., C. McDonough, J. Awika, and L. Rooney. 2004. Microscopic changes during development of sorghums with and without pigmented testa. Journal of Cereal Science 39: 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston, G., M. Heckemeyer, E.S. Cyr, and L. Wartelle. 2016. Case Study: Commercialization of sweet sorghum juice clarification for large-scale syrup manufacture. Sugar Tech 18: 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston, G., L. Wartelle, J. Zatlokovicz, E. Petrie, M. Cole, and E. St. Cyr. 2017. Processing attributes and performance of sweet sorghum biomass for large-scale biorefineries: A 1-year comparison of commercial hybrids and a cultivar. Sugar Tech. doi:10.1007/s12355-017-0533-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, J., Z. Helsel, K. Woodard, J. Venramini, Y. Wang, L. Sollenberger, and R.A. Gilbert. 2011. Planting date affects biomass and Brix of sweet sorghum grown for biofuel in Florida. Agronomy Journal 103: 1827–1833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerik, T., and C. Neely. 1987. Crop ecology, production, and management. Plant density effects on main culm and tiller development of grain sorghum. Crop Science 27: 1225–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godshall, M. 1997. Color analysis. In Proceedings of the sugar industry technologists meeting, Canada, LVI, 211–231.

  • Hahn, D., L. Rooney, and C. Earp. 1984. Tannins and phenols of sorghum. Cereal Foods World 29: 776–779.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, C., A. Fatima, R. Srinivasa, B. Reddy, A. Rathore, R. Nageswar, S. Khalid, A. Kumar, and A. Kamal. 2010. Characterization of improved sweet sorghum genotypes for biochemical parameters, sugar yield and its attributes at different phenological stages. Sugar Tech 12: 322–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, R. 1978. Fuels from sugar crops: Systems study for sugarcane, sweet sorghum and sugar beets, 37. Oak Ridge: United States Department of Energy, Technical Information Center, 71D-22781.

  • Nyachoti, C., J. Atkinson, and S. Leeson. 1997. Sorghum tannins: A review. Worlds Poultry Science Journal 53: 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, T., M. Bitzer, J. Toy, and J. Pederson. 2010. Heterosis in sweet sorghum and selection of a new sweet sorghum hybrid for use in syrup production in Appalachia. Crop Science 50: 1788–1794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinby, J. 1963. Manifestations of hybrid vigor in sorghum. Crop Science 3: 288–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, L., and F. Miller. 1982. Variation in the structure and kernel characteristics of sorghum. In Proceedings of the international symposium of sorghum grain quality, 143–162.

  • Schaffert, R., and L. Gourley. 1982. Sorghum as an energy source in sorghum in the eighties. In Proceedings of the International Symposium Sorghum, Patancheur, AP, 502324. ICRASAT, 605–623.

  • Weitzel, T., J. Cundiff, and D. Vaughan. 1989. Optimization of sweet sorghum processing parameters. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Biology and Engineering 32: 273–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., A. Dolat, Y. Steinberger, X. Wang, A. Osman, and G. Xie. 2009. Biomass yield and changes in chemical composition of sweet sorghum cultivars grown for biofuel. Field Crops Research 111: 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the US Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. USDA-ARS-Southern Regional Research Center, 1100 Robert E. Lee Blvd., New Orleans, LA, 70124, USA

    Gillian Eggleston, Lynda Wartelle, John Zatlokovicz III, Marsha Cole & Eldwin St. Cyr

  2. USDA-ARS-Sugarcane Unit, 5883 USDA Road, Houma, LA, 70360, USA

    Eric Petrie

Authors
  1. Gillian Eggleston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lynda Wartelle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John Zatlokovicz III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eric Petrie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marsha Cole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Eldwin St. Cyr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gillian Eggleston.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eggleston, G., Wartelle, L., Zatlokovicz, J. et al. Quality Attributes of Sweet Sorghum for the Large-Scale Production of Bioproducts: A 1-Year Comparison of Commercial Hybrids and a Cultivar. Sugar Tech 20, 347–356 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-017-0531-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-017-0531-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation