Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial variability of soil organic matter in a gravel-sand mulched jujube orchard at field scale

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In agricultural ecosystems, soil organic matter (SOM) is a major determinant and indicator of soil fertility and quality. The objectives of this study were to understand the spatial distribution of SOM and the accuracy of two interpolation methods evaluated: Kriging and inverse distance weighting (IDW) in a gravel-sand mulch of northwest China. We are measuring SOM in 256 soil samples collected from 0 to 10, 10–20, 20–30, and 30–50 cm layers at five sampling scales, 32 × 32, 28 × 28, 24 × 24, 20 × 20, and 16 × 16 m, and three sampling spacings, 4, 8, and 12 m. SOM content decreased with depth in each scale, varying from 2.41 to 5.75 g/kg. The SOM was weakly to moderately variable and has a strong spatial autocorrelation. The standard deviation was small for each soil layer, and the variability was low or weakly moderate, indicating that two interpolation methods were applicable to the entire data set. Kriging interpolation was more accurate than IDW. The distribution of SOM differed in the surface layers at the five sampling scales, which was more uniform as the sampling scale decreased. Eight meter is a reasonable sampling spacing. Through the scales effect and spacing change on SOM for fixed-point monitoring, combing the estimate of SOM to reduce the sampling workload will aid the supply of SOM in gravel-sand mulched fields in arid regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cambardella CA, Moorman TB, Novak JM, Parkin TB, Karlen DL, Turco RF, Konopka AE (1994) Field-scale variability of soil properties in Central Iowa soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58(5):1501–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappai C, Kemanian AR, Lagomarsino A, Roggero PP, Lai R, Agnelli AE, Seddaiu G (2017) Small-scale spatial variation of soil organic matter pools generated by cork oak trees in mediterranean agro-silvo-pastoral systems. Geoderma 304:59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen FW, Liu CW (2012) Estimation of the spatial rainfall distribution using inverse distance weighting (IDW) in the middle of Taiwan. Paddy Water Environ 10:209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen QQ, Shen CD, Sun YM et al (2005) Mechanism of distribution of soil organic matter with depth due to evolution of soil profiles at the dinghushan biosphere reserve. Acta Pedol Sin 42(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang K, Li H, Wang Z, du Y, Wang J (2016) Comparative analysis on spatial variability of soil moisture under different land use types in orchard. Sci Hortic 207:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu KL, Li H, Li BG, Huang Y (2007) Spatial and temporal variability of soil organic matter in the urban–rural transition zone of Beijing. Geoderma 141:302–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu K, Wang S, Li H, Huang F, Li B (2014) Spatial scaling effects on variability of soil organic matter and total nitrogen in suburban Beijing. Geoderma 226-227(1):54–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang YJ, Ye HC, Zhang LP, Zhang S, Shen C, Li Z, Huang Y (2017) Prediction of soil organic matter using ordinary kriging combined with the clustering of self-organizing map: a case study in Pinggu district, Beijing, China. Soil Sci 182:52–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimek B, Jelonkiewicz Ł, Niklińska M (2016) Drivers of temperature sensitivity of decomposition of soil organic matter along a mountain altitudinal gradient in the Western Carpathians. Ecol Res 31(5):609–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei ZD, Yang SX, Xie SC (1988) Soil hydrodynamics. Tsinghua University, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Li XY (2003) Gravel–sand mulch for soil and water conservation in the semiarid loess region of northwest China. Catena 52:105–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu XM, Zhao KL, Xu JM, Zhang M, Si B, Wang F (2008) Spatial variability of soil organic matter and nutrients in paddy fields at various scales in southeast China. Environ Geol 53(5):1139–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabit L, Bernard C (2010) Spatial distribution and content of soil organic matter in an agricultural field in eastern Canada, as estimated from geostatistical tools. Earth Surf Process Landf 35:278–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti A, Piccing C, Francaviglia R et al (2012) Spatial distribution of soil organic matter using geostatistics: a key indicator to assess soil degradation status in central Italy. Pedosphere 22:230–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer N, Bornemann L, Welp G, Schiedung H, Herbst M, Amelung W (2017) Carbon saturation drives spatial patterns of soil organic matter losses under long-term bare fallow. Geoderma 306:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monica CJ, Lan H, Qian X, Ram CT (2010) A modified version of Moran’s I. Int J Health Geogr 9(1):33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Soil Survey Office Chinese Soils (1998) China soil. China Agriculture Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen DR, Bouma J (1985) Soil spatial variability. Wageningen, Pudoc

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham T (2016) The semi-variogram and spectral distortion measures for image texture retrieval. IEEE Trans Image Process 25(4):1556–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phogat V, Yadav AK, Malik RS, Kumar S, Cox J (2010) Simulation of salt and water movement and estimation of water productivity of rice crop irrigated with saline water. Paddy Water Environ 8:333–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu Y, Xie ZK, Wang YJ, Malhi SS, Ren JL (2015) Long-term effects of gravel-sand mulch on soil organic carbon and nitrogen in the loess plateau of northwestern China. J Arid Land 7(1):46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu W, Curtin D, Johnstone P, Beare M, Hernandez-Ramirez G (2016) Small-scale spatial variability of plant nutrients and soil organic matter: an arable cropping case study. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 47(19):2189–2199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt MW, Torn MS, Abiven S et al (2011) Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 478:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibert J, Stendahl J, Sorensen R (2007) Topographical influences on soil properties in boreal forests. Geoderma 141:139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomazini A, Mendonça ES, Souza JL, Cardoso IM, Garbin ML (2015) Impact of organic no-till vegetables systems on soil organic matter in the Atlantic forest biome. Sci Hortic 182:145–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang DD, Shi XZ, Wang HJ et al (2010) Scale effect of climate and soil texture on soil organic carbon in the uplands of Northeast China. Pedosphere 20:525–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JY, Wang C, Wang F et al (2015) Soil fertility evaluation based on field scale in the gravel mulched field. Chin J Soil Sci 46:36–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Yang R, Feng Y (2017) Spatial variability of reconstructed soil properties and the optimization of sampling number for reclaimed land monitoring in an opencast coal mine. Arab J Geosci 10(2):46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western AW, Bloschl G, Grayson RB (1998) Geostatistical characterization of soil moisture patterns in the Tarrawarra catchment. J Hydrol 205(1–2):20–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu CF, Wu JP, Luo YM, Zhang L, DeGloria SD (2009) Spatial prediction of soil organic matter content using cokriging with remotely sensed data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:1202–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang D, Xiang WH, Fang X et al (2014) Spatial heterogeneity of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen concentrations in a Lithocarpus glaber-Cyclobalanopsis glauca evergreen broadleaved forest. Acta Ecol Sin 34(12):3452–3462

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasrebi J, Saffari M, Fathi H et al (2009) Evaluation and comparison of ordinary kriging and inverse distance weighting methods for prediction of spatial variability of some soil chemical parameters. Res J Biol Sci 4:385–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Yemefack M, Rossiter DG, Njomgang R (2005) Multi-scale characterization of soil variability within an agricultural landscape mosaic system in southern Cameroon. Geoderma 125:117–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Zhang X (2014) The influence of spatial resolution on the prediction of soil organic matter distribution in a mollisol watershed of Northeast China. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 13(4):669–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang SW, Huang YF, Shen CY et al (2012) Spatial prediction of soil organic matter using terrain indices and categorical variables as auxiliary information. Geoderma 171(2):35–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao WJ, Cui Z, Ma H (2017a) Fractal features of soil particle-size distributions and their relationships with soil properties in gravel-mulched fields. Arab J Geosci 10(9):211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao WJ, Sheng J, Li ZL et al (2017b) Spatial variability of soil salinity in a gravel-sand mulched jujube orchard at different scales. J Irrig Drain Eng 143(6):04017009 1-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao WJ, Cui Z, Zhang JY, Jin J (2017c) Temporal stability and variability of soil-water content in a gravel-mulched field in northwestern China. J Hydrol 552:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao WJ, Cui Z, Fan YW et al (2018) Predicting spatial variability of soil bulk density in gravel-mulched fields. J Hydrol Eng 23(6):04018022 1-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman D, Pavlik C, Ruggles A et al (1999) An experimental comparison of ordinary and universal Kriging and inverse distance weighting. Math Geosci 31(4):375–390

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51869010), Ministry of Agriculture Open Fund Project (2017001) and Hong Liu supporting discipline of Lanzhou University of Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Energy and Power Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, China

    Wenju Zhao, Taohong Cao & Yu Su

  2. General Institute for Water Resources and Hydropower Planning and Design, Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing, 100120, China

    Zongli Li

  3. Jiangxi Water Resources Planning and Design Institute, Nanchang, 330029, China

    Minqiang Luo

Authors
  1. Wenju Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Taohong Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zongli Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Minqiang Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yu Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenju Zhao.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Abdullah Al-Amri

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, W., Cao, T., Li, Z. et al. Spatial variability of soil organic matter in a gravel-sand mulched jujube orchard at field scale. Arab J Geosci 13, 446 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05465-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05465-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation