Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Where is the limit? lessons learned from long-term conservation agriculture research in Zimuto Communal Area, Zimbabwe

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Smallholder farming in Zimbabwe is increasingly affected by dwindling maize (Zea mays L.) yields due to declining soil fertility and the negative effects of climate variability and change. A long-term on-farm study was established between 2004 and 2013 at the Zimuto Communal Area near Masvingo, Southern Zimbabwe to test the feasibility and viability of conservation agriculture (CA) systems under the circumstances of low fertility and erratic rainfall. CA seeding systems based on animal traction excelled and significantly increased maize productivity by up to 235% (1761 kg ha-1) and legume productivity by 173% (265 kg ha-1) as compared to the conventional control treatment. Soil quality indicators such as infiltration and soil carbon improved 64-96% and 29-97 %, respectively, over time. However, a direct link between increased infiltration and grain yield could not be established. Increased plant population, because of greater precision and moisture conservation during direct seeding as well as an improved response to fertilizer application due to gradually increasing soil carbon could be the reasons why yields on CA systems outyielded the conventional control. CA systems were more economically viable than planting crops under the normal conventional practice with mouldboard ploughs and removal of crop residues. Farmers generally rated important crop characteristics of maize planted under CA as high but weed control was rated as low, due to the lack of an appropriate herbicide under the prevailing environment. The results of this study show that CA is a potential option even in areas of climate risk and low soil fertility. However, the adoption of CA was low amongst members of the rural farming community due to the perceived risk of crop failure, lack of appropriate and accessible inputs and markets for farm produce, and lack of appropriate information and knowledge about alternative agricultural methods. This highlights the need for better resource and input availability as well as more vibrant and efficient extension services. Successful CA promotion requires that the systems are adapted to farmers’ circumstances. However, CA cannot expand where farmers depend on remittances, are donor dependent, and where crop production in general is doubtful. Land uses such as extensive livestock production or game ranching may be better and more profitable alternatives for farmers in these situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, J. A., & D’Souza, S. (2013). From adoption claims to understanding farmers and contexts: a literature review of Conservation Agriculture (CA) adoption among smallholder farmers in southern Africa. Agricultural Systems and Enviroment, in press.

  • Arslan, A., McCarthy, N., Lipper, L., Asfaw, S., & Cattaneo, A. (2013). Adoption and intensity of adoption of conservation farming practices in Zambia. ESA Working paper No. 13-01. FAO, Rome, Italy.

  • Baudron, F., Jaleta, M., Okitoi, O., & Tegegn, A. (2013). Conservation agriculture in African mixed crop-livestock systems: expanding the niche. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 187, 171–182. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.08.020.

  • Becker, M., Ladha, J., & Ali, M. (1995). Green manure technology: potential, usage, and limitations. a case study for lowland rice. Plant and Soil, 174(1–2), 181–194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, A., & Sullivan, C. (1986). The comparative drought resistance of landraces of sorghum and millet from dry and humid regions. Annals of Botany, 57(6), 835–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, J. E., Sonder, K., Zaidi, P. H., Verhulst, N., Mahuku, G., Babu, R., et al. (2012). Maize production in a changing climate: impacts, adaptation, and mitigation strategies. In D. Sparks (Ed.), Advances in agronomy (Vol. 114, pp. 1–58). Burlington: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, J. E., Hellin, J., Sonder, K., Araus, J. L., MacRobert, J. F., Thierfelder, C., et al. (2013). Adapting maize production to climate change in sub-Saharan Africa. Food Security, 1–16.

  • Chamala, S., Cornish, P., Pratley, J. (1987). Adoption processes and extension strategies for conservation farming. Tillage: New directions in Australian agriculture, 400–419.

  • Davis, K. E., Ekboir, J., & Spielman, D. J. (2008). Strengthening agricultural education and training in sub-Saharan Africa from an innovation systems perspective: a case study of Mozambique. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 14, 35–51.

  • Derpsch, R., Friedrich, T., Kassam, A., & Hongwen, L. (2010). Current status of adoption of no-till farming in the world and some of its main benefits. International Journal of Agriculture and Biological Engineering, 3(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellert, B. H., & Bettany, J. R. (1995). Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 75(4), 529–538. doi:10.4141/cjss95-075.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erenstein, O., Sayre, K., Wall, P., Hellin, J., & Dixon, J. (2012). Conservation agriculture in maize- and wheat-bems in the (Sub)tropics: lessons from Adaptation Initiatives in South Asia, Mexico, and Southern ased SystAfrica. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 36(2), 180–206. doi:10.1080/10440046.2011.620230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2002) Conservation agriculture: Case studies in Latin America and Africa. FAO Soils Bulletin 78 FAO, Rome

  • GART. (2002). Conservation tillage with oxen: Conservation farming handbook no:2. Lusaka: MACO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giller, K. E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M., & Tittonell, P. (2009). Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: the heretic’s view. Field Crops Research, 114, 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin, T. F. (1999). An Australian perspective on the constraints to the transfer and adoption of innovations in land management. Environmental Conservation, 26(4), 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, C., Haque, M. E., Bell, R. W., Thierfelder, C., & Esdaile, R. J. (2012). Conservation agriculture for small holder rainfed farming: opportunities and constraints of new mechanized seeding systems. Field Crops Research, 132, 18–32. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., Shaxson, F., & Pretty, J. (2009). The spread of conservation agriculture: justification, sustainability and uptake. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 7(4), 292–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassie, G. T., Erenstein, O., Mwangi, W., La Rovere, R., Setimela, P., & Langyintuo, A. (2012). Characterization of maize production in Southern Africa: Synthesis of CIMMYT/ DTMA household level farming system surveys in Angola, Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Socio-economics program working paper 4. Mexico: D.F.: CIMMYT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kladviko, E. J., Mackay, A. D., & Bradford, J. M. (1986). Earthworms as a factor in the reduction of soil crusting. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 50, 191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulshreshtha, S., & Brown, W. (1993). Role of farmers’ attitudes in adoption of irrigation in Saskatchewan. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 7(2), 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. (1974). Soil temperature, soil moisture and maize yield from mulched and unmulched tropical soils. Plant and Soil, 40(1), 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell, D. B., Burke, M. B., Tebaldi, C., Mastrandrea, M. D., Falcon, W. P., & Naylor, R. L. (2008). Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science, 319, 607–610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mashingaidze, A. B., Govere, I., Rohrbach, D., Twomlow, S., Hove, L., & Mazvimavi, K. (2006). A preliminary review of NGO efforts to promote conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe, 2005–2006 season. Harare: FAO Emergency Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mashingaidze, N., Madakadze, C., Twomlow, S., Nyamangara, J., & Hove, L. (2012). Crop yield and weed growth under conservation agriculture in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Soil and Tillage Research, 124, 102–110. doi:10.1016/j.still.2012.05.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazvimavi K, Twomlow S, Belder P, Hove L (2008). An assessment of the sustainable uptake of conservation farming in Zimbabwe International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics: Global Theme on Agroecosystems Report no. 39, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.

  • Muchow, R. (1989). Comparative productivity of maize, sorghum and pearl millet in a semi-arid tropical environment II. effect of water deficits. Field Crops Research, 20(3), 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munyati, M. (1997). Conservation tillage for sustainable crop production systems: results and experiences from on-station and on-farm research (1988–1996). The Zimbabwe Science News, 31(2), 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muoni, T., Rusinamhodzi, L., & Thierfelder, C. (2013). Weed control in conservation agriculture systems of Zimbabwe: identifying economical best strategies. Crop Protection, 53, 23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mupangwa, W., Twomlow, S., & Walker, S. (2008). The influence of conservation tillage methods on soil water regimes in semi-arid southern Zimbabwe. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 33(8–13), 762–767. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2008.06.049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwale, C. (2009). Effect of tillage practices on weed populations and seed banks in maize based production systems in Malawi. Master thesis, Master thesis, ISARA-Lyon, University of Lyon, 31. July 2009.

  • Ngwira, A. R., Aune, J. B., & Mkwinda, S. (2012a). On-farm evaluation of yield and economic benefit of short term maize legume intercropping systems under conservation agriculture in Malawi. Field Crops Research, 132, 149–157. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngwira, AR., Thierfelder, C., & Lambert, D. M. (2012b). Conservation agriculture systems for Malawian smallholder farmers: long-term effects on crop productivity, profitability and soil quality. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems FirstView, 1–14. doi:10.1017/S1742170512000257.

  • Nyamangara, J., Masvaya, E. N., Tirivavi, R., & Nyengerai, K. (2013). Effect of hand-hoe based conservation agriculture on soil fertility and maize yield in selected smallholder areas in Zimbabwe. Soil and Tillage Research, 126(0), 19–25. doi:10.1016/j.still.2012.07.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyamapfene, K. (1991). Soils of Zimbabwe. Nehanda Publishers (Pvt) Ltd, Harare, Zimbabwe.75–79.

  • Sanginga, N., & Woomer, P. L. (2009). integrated soil fertility management in africa: principles, practices and developmental process. Cali: CIAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaxson, T. F. (2003). Soil moisture conservation. In L. Garcia-Torres, J. Benites, A. Martinez-Vilela, & A. Holgado-Cabrera (Eds.), Conservation agriculture (pp. 317–326). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, B. G., Thierfelder, C., Kienzle, J., Friedrich, T., & Kassam, A. (2012). Development of the conservation agriculture equipment industry in sub-Saharan Africa. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 28(6), 813–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thierfelder, C., & Wall, P. C. (2009). Effects of conservation agriculture techniques on infiltration and soil water content in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Soil and Tillage Research, 105(2), 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thierfelder, C., & Wall, P. C. (2010a). Investigating conservation agriculture (CA) systems in Zambia and Zimbabwe to mitigate future effects of climate change. Journal of Crop Improvement, 24(2), 113–121. doi:10.1080/15427520903558484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thierfelder, C., & Wall, P. C. (2010b). Rotations in conservation agriculture systems of Zambia: effects on soil quality and water relations. Experimental Agriculture, 46(03), 309–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thierfelder, C., & Wall, P. C. (2012). Effects of conservation agriculture on soil quality and productivity in contrasting agro-ecological environments of Zimbabwe. Soil Use and Management, 28(2), 209–220. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2012.00406.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thierfelder, C., Chisui, J. L., Gama, M., Cheesman, S., Jere, Z. D., Bunderson, W. T., Ngwira, A. R., Eash, N. S., & Rusinamhodzi, L. (2013a). Maize-based conservation agriculture systems in Malawi: long-term trends in productivity. Field Crop Research, 142, 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thierfelder, C., Mwila, M., & Rusinamhodzi, L. (2013b). Conservation agriculture in eastern and southern provinces of Zambia: long-term effects on soil quality and maize productivity. Soil and Tillage Research, 126, 246–258. doi:10.1016/j.still.2012.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thierfelder C, Rusinamhodzi L, Ngwira RA, Mupangwa W, Nyagumbo I, Kassie GT, Cairns JE (2014). Conservation agriculture in southern Africa: advances in knowledge. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, in press.

  • Thornton, P. K., Jones, P. G., Owiyo, T., Kruska, R., Herrero, M., Kristjanson, P., Notenbaert, A., Bekele, N., & Omolo, A. (2006). Mapping climate vulnerability and poverty in Africa. Nairobi: International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Twomlow SJ, Steyn JT, du Preez CC (2006). Dryland farming in southern Africa. Dryland agriculture (drylandagricult):769-836.

  • Umar, B. B., Aune, J. B., Johnsen, F. H., & Lungu, O. I. (2011). Options for improving smallholder conservation agriculture in Zambia. Journal of Agricultural Science, 3(3), p50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valbuena, D., Erenstein, O., Homann-Kee Tui, S., Abdoulaye, T., Claessens, L., Duncan, A. J., et al. (2012). Conservation agriculture in mixed crop–livestock systems: scoping crop residue trade-offs in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Field Crops Research, 132, 175–184. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.02.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, C., & Shamudzarira, Z. (2000). Methodological development in linking farmer participatory research with simulation modelling for improved resource management and productivity in Southern Zimbabwe. Risk management project working paper series 00/04. Mexico: DF: CIMMYT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst, N., Kienle, F., Sayre, K. D., Deckers, J., Raes, D., Limon-Ortega, A., Tijerina-Chavez, L., & Govaerts, B. (2011). Soil quality as affected by tillage-residue management in a wheat-maize irrigated bed planting system. Plant and Soil, 340, 453–466.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, V., & Thomas, R. G. (1961). An agricultural survey of Southern Rhodesia: part I: The agroecological survey,”. government printer, Salisbury:345 pp.

  • Vogel, H. (1994). Weeds in single-crop conservation farming in Zimbabwe. Soil and Tillage Research, 31, 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, H. (1995). The need for integrated weed management systems in smallholder conservation farming in Zimbabwe. Der Tropenlandwirt, 96, 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, P. C. (2007). Tailoring conservation agriculture to the needs of small farmers in developing countries: an analysis of issues. Journal of Crop Improvement, 19(1/2), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, P. C., Thierfelder, C., Ngwira, A., Govaerts, B., Nyagumbo, I., & Baudron, F. (2013). Conservation agriculture in Eastern and Southern Africa. In R. A. Jat, K. L. Sahrawat, & A. H. Kassam (Eds.), Conservation agriculture: Global prospects and challenges. Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8DE: CABI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wossink, G., De Buck, A., Van Niejenhuis, J., & Haverkamp, H. (1997). Farmer perceptions of weed control techniques in sugarbeet. Agricultural Systems, 55(3), 409–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is embedded in the MAIZE and CCAFS CGIAR Research Program and was funded for many years by various donors. The financial contribution of the German Ministry of Economic Cooperation (BMZ) and the International Fund for Agriculture Development (IFAD) are acknowledged and greatly appreciated. The study was logistically supported by CIMMYT-Southern Africa and the University of Hohenheim, Germany. Special thanks go to Kai Sonder for GIS work, Stephanie Cheesman, Sign Phiri and Herbert Chipara for their contribution in monitoring, evaluation and data collection and the extension officers and farmers at Zimuto Communal Area who worked with us for up to nine years to complete this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CIMMYT, P.O. Box MP 163, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe

    Christian Thierfelder, Munyaradzi Mutenje, Angeline Mujeyi & Walter Mupangwa

Authors
  1. Christian Thierfelder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Munyaradzi Mutenje
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Angeline Mujeyi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Walter Mupangwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Thierfelder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thierfelder, C., Mutenje, M., Mujeyi, A. et al. Where is the limit? lessons learned from long-term conservation agriculture research in Zimuto Communal Area, Zimbabwe. Food Sec. 7, 15–31 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-014-0404-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-014-0404-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation