Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Penetrating Cervical Vascular Injuries

  • Trauma to the Neck (W Biffl, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Trauma Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This article reviews penetrating cervical vascular injuries, with a focus on the initial control, diagnostic workup, and operative or endovascular management. The review highlights the change in management approach from one based on anatomical zones of the neck to the contemporary approach of using physical exam and computed tomographic angiography to guide decision making.

Recent Findings

The approach to penetrating neck injuries has evolved over the past 40 years with a resultant decrease in the rate of non-therapeutic operations, driven primarily by improvements in imaging technology. The role of endovascular techniques is now established for vertebral artery injuries and continues to evolve for non-emergent carotid injuries.

Summary

Penetrating cervical injuries pose a significant risk to life and triage of patients to the operating room or further imaging by computed tomographic angiography (CTA) must occur promptly based on the physical examination. In the operating room, the management of complex venous injuries consists of simple ligation. Vertebral injuries can be temporized with packing or bone wax and then managed with percutaneous endovascular interventions. Carotid injuries may generally be managed with arteriorrhaphy, primary repair, or reconstruction with venous or PTFE graft. In damage control situations, shunting is preferred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Nason R, Assuras G, Gray P, Lipschitz J, Burns C. Penetrating neck injuries: analysis of experience from a Canadian trauma Centre. Can J Surg. 2001;44(2):122–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. • Low GM, Inaba K, Chouliaras K, Branco B, Lam L, Benjamin E, et al. The use of the anatomic “zones” of the neck in the assessment of penetrating neck injury. 2014;80(10):970. A study looking critically at traditional neck zones which cast doubt on the validity of using external markings of injury to predict which underlying structures were injured.

  3. •• Inaba K, Branco BC, Menaker J, Alea T, Crane S, DuBose JJ, et al. Evaluation of multidetector computed tomography for penetrating neck injury: a prospective multicenter study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(3):576 The AAST multi-center trial that most significantly established MDCTA’s superiority as the radiographic method to evaluate penetrating neck injuries. The authors showed this tool to be very sensitive and specific for vascular and aerodigestive structures.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. • Ibraheem K, Khan M, Rhee P, Azim A, O’Keeffe T, Tang A, et al. “No zone” approach in penetrating neck trauma reduces unnecessary computed tomography angiography and negative explorations. J Surg Res. 2018;221:113–20 A large, retrospective review of penetrating neck injuries was used to show that the “no zone” approach can decrease rates of negative exploration and that physical exam, not location, should be the principal input to guide management.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bell BR, Osborn T, Dierks EJ, Potter BE, Long WB. Management of penetrating neck injuries: a new paradigm for civilian trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(4):691–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Markey J, Hines J, Nance F. Penetrating neck wounds: a review of 218 cases. Am Surg. 1975;41(2):77–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roon AJ, Christensen N. Evaluation and treatment of penetrating cervical injuries. J Trauma. 1979;19(6):391–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tisherman SA, Bokhari F, Collier B, Cumming J, Ebert J, Holevar M, et al. Clinical practice guideline: penetrating zone II neck trauma. J Trauma. 2008;64(5):1392–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Biffl W, Moore E, Rehse D, Offner P, Franciose R, Burch J. Selective management of penetrating neck trauma based on cervical level of injury 1997;174(6):678.

  10. • Prichayudh S, Choadrachata-anun J, Pak-art R, Sriussadaporn S, Kritayakirana K, et al. Selective management of penetrating neck injuries using “no zone” approach. Inj. 2015;46(9):1720 A large series of penetrating neck injuries managed with a “no zone” approach. The authors showed that the there was a low rate of negative exploration and no missed injuries with this updated approach.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Joos E, Inaba K. Neck operations for trauma: general principles. In: Demetriades D, Inaba K, Velmahos G, editors. Atlas of Surgical Techniques in Trauma. Cambridge: 2013. pp. 47–52.

  12. Warriner Z, Lam L, Matsushima K, Benjamin E, Strumwasser A, Demetriades D, et al. Initial evaluation of the efficacy and safety of in-hospital expandable hemostatic minisponge use in penetrating trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;Publish Ahead of Print:1.

  13. Sperry JL, Moore EE, Coimbra R, Croce M, Davis JW, Karmy-Jones R, et al. Western trauma association critical decisions in trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(6):936–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shiroff A, Gale SC, Martin ND, Marchalik D, Petrov D, Ahmed HM, et al. Penetrating neck trauma: a review of management strategies and discussion of the “No Zone” approach. 2013;79(1):23.

  15. Núñez DB, Torres-León M, Munera F. Vascular injuries of the neck and thoracic inlet: helical CT-angiographic correlation. Radiographics. 2004;24(4):1087–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Munera F, Soto JA, Palacio DM, Castañeda J, Morales C, Sanabria A, et al. Penetrating neck injuries: helical CT angiography for initial evaluation. Radiology. 2002;224(2):366–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mazolewski P, Curry J, Browder T, Fildes J. Computed tomographic scan can be used for surgical decision making in zone II penetrating neck injuries. J Trauma. 2001;51(2):315.

  18. Gracias V, Reilly P, Philpott J, Klein W, Lee S, Singer M, et al. Computed tomography in the evaluation of penetrating neck trauma: a preliminary study 2001;136(11):1231.

  19. E, Schroeder JW, Ptak T, Corey AS, Ahmed O, Biffl WL, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® penetrating neck injury. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(11S):S500.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Inaba K, Munera F, McKenney M, Rivas L, de Moya M, Bahouth H, et al. Prospective evaluation of screening multislice helical computed tomographic angiography in the initial evaluation of penetrating neck injuries. J Trauma. 2006;61(1):144–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Munera F, Cohn S, Rivas LA. Penetrating injuries of the neck: use of helical computed tomographic angiography 2005;58(2):413.

  22. Steenburg SD, Sliker CW, Shanmuganathan K, Siegel EL. Imaging evaluation of penetrating neck injuries. Radiographics. 2010;30(4):869–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Múnera F, Soto JA, Palacio D, Velez SM, Medina E. Diagnosis of arterial injuries caused by penetrating trauma to the neck: comparison of helical CT angiography and conventional angiography. Radiology. 2000;216(2):356–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jarvik J, Philips G, Schwab C, Schwartz J, Grossman R. Penetrating neck trauma: sensitivity of clinical examination and cost-effectiveness of angiography 1995;16(4):647.

  25. Rivers S, Patel Y, Lany H, Veith F. Limited role of arteriography in penetrating neck trauma 1988;8(2):112.

  26. Al-Ameri H, Thomas ML, Yoon A, Mayeda GS, Burstein S, Kloner RA, et al. Complication rate of diagnostic carotid angiography performed by interventional cardiologists. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73(5):661–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ginzburg E, Montalvo B, LeBlang S, Nunez D, Martin L. The use of duplex ultrasonography in penetrating neck trauma 1996;131(7):691.

  28. Fry W, Dort J, Smith R, Sayers D, Morabito D. Duplex scanning replaces arteriography and operative exploration in the diagnosis of potential cervical vascular injury 1994;168(6):693.

  29. Montalvo B, LeBlang S, Nuñez D, Ginzburg E, Klose K, Becerra J, et al. Color Doppler sonography in penetrating injuries of the neck 1996;17(5):943.

  30. Demetriades D, Theodorou D, Cornwell E, Weaver F, Yellin A, Velmahos G, et al. Penetrating injuries of the neck in patients in stable condition. Physical examination, angiography, or color flow Doppler imaging. 1995;130(9):971.

  31. Yaquinto J, Harms S, Siemers P, Flamig D, Griffey R, Foreman M. Arterial injury from penetrating trauma: evaluation with single-acquisition fat-suppressed MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 1992;158(3):631–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Friedman D, Flanders A, Thomas C, Millar W. Vertebral artery injury after acute cervical spine trauma: rate of occurrence as detected by MR angiography and assessment of clinical consequences. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164(2):443–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zarrinkoob L, Ambarki K, Wåhlin A, Birgander R, Eklund A, Malm J. Blood flow distribution in cerebral arteries. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014;35(4):648–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kwon E, Grabo D, Velmahos G. Carotid artery and internal jugular vein injuries. In: Demetriades D, Inaba K, Velmahos G, editors. Atlas of surgical techniques in trauma. Cambridge: 2013. pp. 53–68.

  35. Demetriades D, Nash N. Vertebral artery injuries. In: Demetriades D, Inaba K, Velmahos G, editors. Atlas of surgical techniques in trauma. Cambridge: 2013. pp. 88–93.

  36. Feliciano D, Vercruysse G. Management of specific injuries - neck. In: Mattos K, Moore E, Feliciano D, editors. Trauma. 8th Ediction: 2017. pp. 414–429.

  37. Apffelstaedt J, Müller R. Results of mandatory exploration for penetrating neck trauma. 1994;18(6):917.

  38. Gonzalez RP, Falimirski M, Holevar MR, Turk B. Penetrating zone II neck injury: does dynamic computed tomographic scan contribute to the diagnostic sensitivity of physical examination for surgically significant injury? A prospective blinded study. 2003;54(1):61.

  39. Inaba K, Munera F, McKenney MG, Rivas L, Marecos E, de Moya M, et al. The nonoperative management of penetrating internal jugular vein injury. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43(1):77–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. McGovern P, Swan K. Management of bilateral internal jugular venous injuries. Elsevier Ltd 1985;16(4):259.

  41. Sakata K, Endo Y, Kimura F, Yamamoto I. Effects of bilateral jugular vein ligation on local cerebral blood flow 1999;9(3):207.

  42. Moore O, Frazell E. Simultaneous bilateral neck dissection: experience with 151 patients. Am J Surg. 1964;107(4):565–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Liekweg WG, Greenfield LJ. Management of penetrating carotid arterial injury. Ann Surg. 1978;188(5):587–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Demetriades D, Skalkides J, Sofianos C, Melissas J, Franklin J. Carotid artery injuries: experience with 124 cases. J Trauma. 1989;29(1):91–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Inaba K, Aksoy H, Seamon MJ, Marks JA, Duchesne J, Schroll R, et al. Multicenter evaluation of temporary intravascular shunt use in vascular trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(3):359–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Almazedi B, Lyall H, Bhatnagar P, Kessel D, McPherson S, Patel JV, et al. Endovascular management of extra-cranial supra-aortic vascular injuries. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37(1):55–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Herrera DA, Vargas SA, Dublin AB. Endovascular treatment of penetrating traumatic injuries of the extracranial carotid artery. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22(1):28–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. • DuBose J, Recinos G, Teixeira PG, Inaba K, Demetriades D. Endovascular stenting for the treatment of traumatic internal carotid injuries: expanding experience. J Trauma. 2008;65(6):1561 A systematic review of endovascular stenting for carotid injuries demonstrating that, as of 2008, the reported experience was mainly for blunt injuries. Stents were generally deployed safely and successfully with no stent-related mortalities reported.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lam Y-Y, Tsui H-F, Wong H-L, Chow Y-Y. Management approach of penetrating vertebral artery injury with concomitant cervical nerve root injury in regional hospital: report of two cases. J Orthop Traumatol Rehabil. 2018;25:5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Uchikawa H, Kai Y, Ohmori Y, Kuratsu J-I. Strategy for endovascular coil embolization of a penetrating vertebral artery injury. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6(1):117.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Mwipatayi B, Jeffery P, Beningfield S, Motale P, Tunnicliffe J, Navsaria P. Management of extra-cranial vertebral artery injuries. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27(2):157–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, 2051 Marengo St., IPT C5L100, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA

    Matt Strickland, Erik Roedel & Kenji Inaba

Authors
  1. Matt Strickland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erik Roedel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kenji Inaba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenji Inaba.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Trauma to the Neck

Previous Submissions

None. This manuscript has not and will not be submitted to any other journal while it is under consideration by Current Trauma Reports.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strickland, M., Roedel, E. & Inaba, K. Penetrating Cervical Vascular Injuries. Curr Trauma Rep 5, 40–47 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-019-0161-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-019-0161-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation