Skip to main content
Log in

New application of microbial fuel cell-based biosensor for monitoring the quality of actual potato chips’ processing wastewater

  • Article
  • Published:
Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 27 August 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

In this study, a dual-chamber microbial fuel cell (MFC) fed with actual potato chips’ processing wastewater (PCPW) was tested as a biosensor. The performance of MFC-based biosensor was evaluated in terms of the current measurement range, toxicity detection and sensitivity, and the operational stability. The results revealed that the MFC can simply be converted to an online biosensor unit to detect the harmful effect of suspended solids and acidic content in the actual PCPW on the anodic attached biofilm and the values of the generated current as well. A notable decrease in the current values was observed indicating the adverse effects of the harmful matters in the PCPW fed to the biosensor unit. The results proposed a competition between the harmful components and the favorable substrate in binding to the redox complex. An excellent fitting was obtained between the experimental and predicted results by \( I_{{K_{m} }} \) model with determination coefficient (R2) and mean-square-error values of 0.927 and 0.363, respectively. Additionally, a new approach was developed based on direct measurement of actual field data to replace the conventional statistical methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Logan BE, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, et al. Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40:5181–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Feng Y, Kayode O Jr, Harper WF. Using microbial fuel cell output metrics and nonlinear modeling techniques for smart biosensing. Sci Total Environ. 2013;449:223–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stein NE, Hamelers HV, Buisman CN. Stabilizing the baseline current of a microbial fuel cell-based biosensor through overpotential control under non-toxic conditions. Bioelectrochemistry. 2010;78:87–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lvars-Barceló F, Zuliani A, Fallah M, et al. Novel applications of microbial fuel cells in sensors and biosensors. Appl Sci. 2018;8:1184–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gil GC, Chang IS, Kim BH, et al. Operational parameters affecting the performance of a mediator-less microbial fuel cell. Biosens Bioelectron. 2003;18:327–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang IS, Moon H, Jang JK, et al. Improvement of a microbial fuel cell performance as a BOD sensor using respiratory inhibitors. Biosens Bioelectron. 2005;20:1856–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grattier M, Minteer SD. Self-powered biosensors. ACS Sens. 2017;5:44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karube I, Matsunaga T, Mitsuda S, et al. Microbial electrode BOD sensors. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1977;19:1535–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu Z, Liu J, Zhang S, et al. Microbial fuel cell based biosensor for in situ monitoring of anaerobic digestion process. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:10221–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stein NE, Keesman KJ, Hamelers HV, et al. Kinetic models for detection of toxicity in a microbial fuel cell based biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron. 2011;26:3115–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shen YJ, Lefebvre O, Tan Z, et al. Microbial fuel-cell-based toxicity sensor for fast monitoring of acidic toxicity. Water Sci Technol. 2012;65:1223–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stein NK, Hamelers HVM, Straten GV, et al. Effect of toxic components on microbial fuel cell-polarization curves and estimation of the type of toxic inhibition. Biosensors. 2012;2:255–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen Z, Niu Y, Zhao S, et al. A novel biosensor for p-nitrophenol based on an aerobic anode microbial fuel cell. Biosens Bioelectron. 2016;85:860–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jia H, Yang G, Ngo HH, et al. Enhancing simultaneous response and amplification of biosensor in microbial fuel cell-based upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactor supplemented with zero-valent iron. Chem Eng J. 2017;327:1117–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou S, Huang S, Li Y, et al. Microbial fuel cell-based biosensor for toxic carbon monoxide monitoring. Talanta. 2018;186:368–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schievano A, Colombo A, Cossettini A, et al. Single-chamber microbial fuel cells as on-line shock-sensors for volatile fatty acids in anaerobic digesters. Waste Manage. 2018;71:785–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang Y, Liang P, Huang X, et al. A novel microbial fuel cell sensor with a gas diffusion biocathode sensing element for water and air quality monitoring. Chemosphere. 2018;203:21–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yi Y, Xie B, Zhao T, et al. Effect of external resistance on the sensitivity of microbial fuel cell biosensor for detection of different types of pollutants. Bioelectrochemistry. 2019;125:71–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Malladi B, Ingham SC. Thermophilic aerobic treatment of potato processing wastewater. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1993;31:426–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Davis M, Cornwell D. Introduction to environmental engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Huang LP, Jin B, Lant P. Direct fermentation of potato starch wastewater to lactic acid by Rhizopus oryzae and Rhizopus arrhizus. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2005;27:229–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hamelers HV, Ter Heijne A, Stein N, et al. Butler–Volmer–Monod model for describing bio-anode polarization curves. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:381–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bisswanger H. Enzyme kinetics principles and methods. Hoboken: Wiley-VCH Verlang GmbH; 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim M, Hyun MS, Gadd GM, et al. A novel biomonitoring system using microbial fuel cells. J Environ Monit. 2007;9:1323–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu D, Bai L, Zhai J, et al. Toxicity detection in water containing heavy metal ions with a self-powered microbial fuel cell-based biosensor. Talanta. 2017;168:210–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang SF, Chen T, Zhang ZL, et al. Direct electrochemistry and electrocatalysis of heme proteins entrapped in agarose hydrogel films in room-temperature ionic liquids. Langmuir. 2005;21:9260–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou T, Han H, Liu P, et al. Microbial fuels cell-based biosensor for toxicity detection: A Review. Sensors. 2017;17:2230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao S, Liu P, Niu Y, et al. A novel early warning system based on a sediment microbial fuel cell for in situ and real time hexavalent chromium detection in industrial wastewater. Sensors. 2018;18:642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely acknowledge the staff of the Salah Al-din Bakery & Pastry factory in Tikrit city, Iraq for being helpful and supportive in providing the actual samples of wastewater. Also, the authors are thankful to the Department of Environmental Engineering at University of Baghdad for the technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zainab Z. Ismail.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Radeef, A.Y., Ismail, Z.Z. New application of microbial fuel cell-based biosensor for monitoring the quality of actual potato chips’ processing wastewater. Waste Dispos. Sustain. Energy 1, 227–235 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-019-00017-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-019-00017-9

Keywords

Navigation