REFERENCES
Cook R, Golombok S: A survey of semen donation: Phase II-The view of the donors. Hum Reprod 1995;10:951-959
Rowland R: Attitudes and opinions of donors on an artificial insemination by donor (AID) programme. Clin Reprod Fertil 1985;2:249-259
Purdie A, Peek JC, Adair V, Graham F, Fisher R: Attitudes of parents of young children to sperm donation-Implications for donor recruitment. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1355-1358
Daniels KR: Semen donors: Their motivations and attitudes to their offspring. J Reprod Infant Psychol 1989;7:121-127
Pedersen B, Nielsen AF, Lauritsen JG: Psychosocial aspects of donor insemination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994;73:701-705
Sauer MV, Gorrill MJ, Zeffer KB, Bustillo M: Attitudinal survey of sperm donors to an artificial insemination clinic. J Reprod Med 1989;34:362-364
Schover LR, Rothmann SA, Collins RL: The personality and motivation of semen donors: A comparison with oocyte donors. Hum Reprod 1992;7:575-579
Soderström-Anttila V: Follow-up study of Finnish volunteer oocyte donors concerning their attitudes to oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 1995;10:3073-2076
Baetens P, Pennings G, Kristoffersen I, Pletincx I, Devroey P: Provision of donor information to the offspring: The opinion of candidate semen donors, students, and fathers. Hum Reprod 1999;14:251. Abstr. Book 1
Cook R, Golombok S: A survey of semen donation: Phase II-the view of the donors. Hum Reprod 1995;10:951-959
British Andrology Society: Implementation of theWithdrawal of Payments To Semen Donors, 1998 [on-line]. Available: http://www.repromed.org.uk/bas/Bas2000/HFEA/bas18.html
De Bruyn JK, De Graaff IA, Brewaeys A, Helmerhorst FM: Knowing the unknown: Donor insemination couple's choices for an anonymous/identifiable donor. Hum Reprod 1996;11:53-54. Abstr. Book 1
Back KW, Snowden R: The anonymity of the gamete donor. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 1988;9:191-1982
Daniels K, Lalos O: The Swedish insemination act and the availability of donors. Hum Reprod 1995;10:1871-1874
Trommelen M, den Otter M, van der Veen G: Bereidheid tot Donatie van Sperma bij Opheffing van de Anonimiteitswaarborg van de Donor. Den Haag, SWOKA, 1999
Heurckmans N, Pennings G, Sabbe K, Baetens P, Rigo A, Pletincs I, Devroey P, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I: The attitude toward offspring by donor candidates and non-donors: The in-fluence of payment, age and fatherhood. Hum Reprod in press. Abstr. Book 1.
Pennings G: The internal coherence of donor insemination practice: Attracting the right type of donor without paying. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1842-1844
Baran A, Pannor R: Lethal Secrets: The Psychology of Donor Insemination. New York, Amistad Press, 1993
Glover J: Fertility and the Family. London, Fourth Estate, 1989
Pennings G: Measuring the welfare of the child: In search of the appropriate evaluation principle. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1146-1150
Bogdan M: Artificial insemination in Swedish law. Comparative Law Yearbook 1988;10:91-106.
Pennings G: Should donors have the right to decide who receives their gametes? Hum Reprod 1995;10:2736-2740
Baran A, Pannor R: Lethal Secrets: The Psychology of Donor Insemination. New York, Amistad Press, 1993
Novaes SB: The medical management of donor insemination. In Donor Insemination, KR Daniels, E Haimes (eds), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp 105-130
Schiff AR: Frustrated intentions and binding biology: Seeking AID in the law. Duke Law J 1994;44:524-570
Swanson HSW: Donor anonymity in artificial insemination: Is it still necessary? Columbia J Law Soc Probl 1993;27:151-190
Novaes SB: The medical management of donor insemination. In Donor Insemination, KR Daniels, E Haimes (eds), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp 105-130
Schenker JG: Sperm, oocyte, and pre-embryo donation. J Ass Reprod Genet 1995;12:499-508
Pennings G: The 'double track' policy for donor anonymity. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2839-2844
Shenfield F: Privacy versus disclosure in gamete donation: A clash of interest, of duties, or an exercise in responsibility? J Ass Reprod Genet 1997;14:371-373
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guido, P. News Around the World: The Reduction of Sperm Donor Candidates Due to the Abolition of the Anonymity Rule: Analysis of an Argument. J Assist Reprod Genet 18, 617–622 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013169207315
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013169207315