Skip to main content
Log in

The identification of barriers preventing the successful implementation of a surgical prophylaxis protocol

  • Published:
Pharmacy World and Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to introduce a protocol for the use of antimicrobials in surgical prophylaxis for the described procedures in Antrim Area Hospital. Method: Historical data of antimicrobial use were obtained from retrospective analysis of patients" charts, for those patients identified as having one of the following ‘clean / contaminated’ surgical procedures over the previous six months; cholecystectomy or abdominal hysterectomy. These data were analysed, and a protocol was introduced providing guidelines for the choice of antimicrobial agent, its administration time, route, dose, duration and frequency of treatment. Main outcome measure: The main outcome measure was the success of the uptake of the protocol following its implementation. Results: There was a total of 285 patients identified, 105 prior to and 180 post implementation. Overall, 68% of patients received some form of prophylaxis in the first cycle, and 72% in the second. Conclusion: Although the introduction of the protocol led to slight improvements in compliance with standard prescribing procedures, with an increase in single‐dose prophylaxis, and a reduction in prolonged prophylactic treatment, the improvements did not reach expectations. This paper attempts to identify the possible barriers to protocol implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burke JF. Use of preventative antibiotics in clinical surgery. Am J Surg 1973;39:6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nahata MC. Guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Clin Pharm Ther 1996;21:255–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dickinson GM, Bisno AL. Antimicrobial prophylaxis of infection. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1995;9:783–804.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sasse A, Mertens R, Sion JP, Ronveaux O, Bossens M, DeMol P et al. Surgical prophylaxis in Belgian hospitals: estimate of costs and potential savings. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998;41:267–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Plowman R, Graves N, Roberts J. Hospital acquired infection. London: Office of Health Economics 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Paluzzi RG. Antimicrobial prophylaxis of infection. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1993;77:427–41.

    Google Scholar 

  7. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery. Effective Health Care 1998; 4(5).

  8. Guglielmo BJ, Hohn DC, Koo PJ, Hunt TK, Sweet RL, Conte JE Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical procedures. Arch Surg 1983;118:943–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong ES. Update: antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery. Hosp Infect Control (Part 1) 1997;9–15.

  10. Waddell TK, Rotstein OD. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Committee on antimicrobial agents, Canadian Infectious Disease Society. Can Med Assoc J 1994;151:925–31.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dellinger EP, Gross PA, Barrett TL, Krause PJ, Martone WJ, McGowan JE Jr et al. Quality standard for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical procedures. The Infectious Diseases Society of America. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1994;15:182–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. American Society of Hospital Pharmacy Commission on Therapeutics. Summary of ASHP therapeutic guidelines on antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Hosp Pharm 1992;49:1493–4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abramowicz MD, editor. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Med Lett Drugs Ther 1997;39:97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ballay JL, Malledant Y, Blery C, Quemener C. Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastroduodenal surgery. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1994;13:S135–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ehrenkranz NJ. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery: mechanisms, misconceptions, and mischief. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1993;14:99–106.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McDonald M, Grabsch E, Marshall C, Forbes A. Single-versus multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: a systematic review. Aust N Z J Surg 1998;68:388–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Song F, Glenny A. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Br J Surg 1998;85:1232–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dellinger EP. Duration of antibiotic treatment in surgical infections of the abdomen. Undesired effects of antibiotics and future studies. Eur J Surg Suppl 1996;576:29–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldman DA, Weinstein RA, Wenzel RP, Ofelia CT, Duma RJ, Gaynes RP et al. Strategies to prevent and control the emergence and spread of antimicrobial-resistant micro-organisms in hospitals. JAMA 1996;275:234–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Office of Technology Assessment (US Congress). Impact of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  21. DiPiro JT, Cheung RP, Bowden TA Jr, Monsberger JA. Single dose systematic antibiotic prophylaxis of surgical wound infections. Am J Surg 1986;152:552–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Edwards C, Stillman P, editors. Minor illness or major disease? London: The Pharmaceutical Press 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mertens R, Verbist L, Gordts B, Lauwers S, Potvleige C, Reybrouck G et al. National study on the utilisation of prophylactic antibiotics in surgery, Belgium, 1986. Epidemiol Infect 1989;103:311–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Finkelstein R, Reinhertz G, Embom A. Surveillance of the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery. Isr J Med Sci 1996;32:1093–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McConachy KA, Cuell S, Kent J, McDonald MI. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in a private hospital. Compliance with guidelines. Aust J Hosp Pharm 1999;29:5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bailey H, Qualie JM, Ketley D. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in acute abdominal and colorectal surgery at Leicester Royal Infirmary. PJ 1992;249:R33.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gyssens IC, Geerligs IE, Dony JM, van der Vliet JA, van Kampen A, van den Broek PJ et al. Optimising antimicrobial drug use in surgery: an intervention study in a Dutch University hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother 1996;38:1001–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Talon D, Mourney F, Touratier S, Marie O, Arlet G, Decazes JM et al. Evaluation of current practices in surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis before and after implementation of local guidelines. J Hosp Inf 2001;49:193–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hell K. Antibiotic prophylaxis in cholecystectomy-necessary and cost saving? Zentramol Chir 1998;123:37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lippert H, Gastinger J. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy. Chemotherapy 1998;44:355–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Frantzides CT, Sykes A. A reevaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 1994;4(6):375–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. ASHP Commission on Therapeutics. ASHP therapeutic guidelines on antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 1999;56:1840–88.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Watkin DS, Wainwright AM, Thompson MH, Leaper DJ. Infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: are antibiotics really necessary? Eur J Surg 1995;161(7):509–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kearney P. Personal communication with P. Kearney MSc, MB, MRCPath, Microbiology Department, Antrim Area Hospital, Antrim, 28 January 2001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burnett, K.M., Scott, M.G., Kearney, P.M. et al. The identification of barriers preventing the successful implementation of a surgical prophylaxis protocol. Pharm World Sci 24, 182–187 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020565000571

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020565000571

Navigation