Skip to main content
Log in

On calculation of the power indices with allowance for the agent preferences

  • Control In Social Economic Systems
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the general case, complexity of the algorithm to calculate the power indices grows exponentially with the number of voting agents. Yet the volume of calculations may be reduced dramatically if many coalitions have equal numbers of votes. The well-known algorithm for calculation of the Banzhaf and Shapley-Shubik indices was generalized, which enables fast calculation of the power indices where entry of the voting agent into a coalition depends on its preferences over the set of the rest of agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Felsenthal, D.S. and Machover, M., The Measurement of Voting Power, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1998.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Aleskerov, F., Power Indices Taking into Account Agents’ Preferences, in Mathematics and Democracy, Berlin: Springer, 2006, pp. 1–18.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bilbao, J.M., Fernandez, J.R., Jimenes, A., and Lopez, J.J., Generating Functions for Computing Power Indices Efficiently, Top, 2000, vol. 8(2), pp. 191–213.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Yakuba, V., Evaluation of Banzhaf Index with Restrictions on Coalitions Formation, Math. Comput. Mod., 2008, vol. 48, pp. 1602–1610.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Banzhaf, J.F., Weighted Voting Doesn’t Work: A Mathematical Analysis, Rutgers Law Review, 1965, vol. 19, pp. 317–343.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shapley, L.S. and Shubik, M., A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 1954, vol. 48(3), pp. 787–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnston, R.J., On the Measurement of Power: Some Reactions to Laver, Environ. Planning, 1978, vol. 10, pp. 907–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deegan, J. and Packel, E.W., A New Index of Power for Simple n-Person Games, Int. J. Game Theory, 1978, vol. 7(2), pp. 113–123.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Holler, M.J. and Packel, E.W., Power, Luck and the Right Index, J. Econom., 1983, vol. 43, pp. 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leech, D., Computation of Power Indices, in Warwick Economic Research Papers, Coventry: Univ. of Warwick, 2002, no. 644.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aleskerov, F.T., Blagoveshchenskii, N.Yu., Satarov, G.A., et al., Vliyanie i strukturnaya ustoichivost’ v Rossiiskom parlamente (1905–1917 and 1993–2005 gg.) (Influence and Structural Stability in the Russian Parliament (1905–1917 and 1993–2005)), Moscow: Fizmatlit, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © D.A. Shvarts, 2009, published in Avtomatika i Telemekhanika, 2009, No. 3, pp. 152–159.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shvarts, D.A. On calculation of the power indices with allowance for the agent preferences. Autom Remote Control 70, 484–490 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117909030138

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117909030138

PACS number

Navigation