Skip to main content

Neurobehavioral Models for Aphasia Rehabilitation

  • Chapter
Neurobehavior of Language and Cognition
  • 302 Accesses

Summary and Conclusions

Neurobehavioral models for aphasia rehabilitation appear to have their roots in Mills’ (1904) ideas about processes responsible for improvement of language with treatment. The more recent theories of Luria (1970) and Albert’s (1989) application of the Laurence and Stein model, as well as Rothi’s (1995) application of Finger and Stein’s model, show a great deal of overlap with one another and with Mills’ much earlier hypotheses. Because of this overlap, Luria’s model for recovery seemed as useful a framework as any for discussing some of the aphasia treatment methods in current use and was adopted in the chapter.

The choice of therapy methods depends to a great extent on identification of spared and impaired functional systems and skills. Careful patient evaluation using a process approach as advocated by Kaplan (1988) is required before specific treatments can be selected and applied.

Treatment examples were discussed within the framework of Luria’s concepts of disinhibition, intrasystemic, and intersystemic reorganization. Only a few methods were chosen to illustrate the three rehabilitation processes. Many other effective aphasia therapy methods exist (see, for example, Helm-Estabrooks & Holland, 1998). As to the future of aphasia rehabilitation, a quote from Martin Albert seems to point the way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albert, M. L. (1989). Experimental approaches to aphasia therapy. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 4 (3), 427–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, M. L. (1998). Treatment of aphasia. (Neurological Review). Archives of Neurology, 55, 1417–1419.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, M. L., Sparks, R. W., & Helm, N. A. (1973). Melodic Intonation Therapy for aphasia. Archives of Neurology, 29, 130–131.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, M. L. & Sandson, J (1986). Perseveration in aphasia. Cortex, 22, 103–115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, M. L., Bachman, D. L., Morgan, A., & Helm-Estabrooks, N. (1988). Pharmacotherapy for aphasia. Neurology, 38, 877–879.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, D. L. & Morgan, A. (1988). The role of pharmacotherapy in the treatment of aphasia: Preliminary results. Aphasiology, 2, 225–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basso, A., Capitani, E., & Vignolo, L. A. (1979). lnfluence of rehabilitation on language skills in aphasia patients. A controlled study. Archives ofNeurology, 36, 190–196.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Billow, B. W. (1949). Observations on the use of sodium amytal in the treatment of aphasia. Medical Records, 162, 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broca, P (1865) Sur le siege de la faculté du langage articulé. Bulletin de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris, 6, 337–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, P. & Helm-Estabrooks, N. (1989). The role of perseveration in confrontation naming performance. In T. Prescott (Ed.), Proceedings of the conference of clinical aphasiology (pp. 271–280). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • W., Schildermans, F., & Deberdt, W. (1994). Effect of piracetam on recovery and rehabilitation after stroke: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clinical Neuropharmacology, 17 (4), 320–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finger, S & Stein, D. G. (1982). Brain damage and recovery: Research and clinical perspectives. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass, H. & Kaplan, E. (1984). Boston diagnostic aphasia examination. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. & Mleoch, A. (1992). Bromocriptine treatment of nonfluent aphasia. Archives ofPhysical and Medical Rehabilitation, 73, 373–316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamsher, K. (1991). Intelligence and aphasia. In M. T. Samo (Ed.), Acquired aphasia (pp. 339–372). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, F. M. (1981). Analysis and remediation of aphasia in the U.S.S.R: The contribution of A. R. Luria. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46, 338–347.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, N. A. & Barresi, B. (1980). Voluntary control of involuntary utterances: A treatment approach for severe aphasia. In R. Brookshire (Ed), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings. Minneapolis, MN: BKK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm-Estabrooks, N. (1983). Exploiting the right hemisphere for language rehabilitation: Melodic intonlation therapy. In E. Pereeman (Ed.), Cognitive processing in the right hemisphere. New York Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm-Estabrooks, N. (1992). Aphasia diagnosticprofiles. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm-Estabrooks, N. (1998). A “cognitive” approach to treatment of an aphasic patient. In N. Helm-Estabrooks & A. L. Holland (Eds.), Approaches to the treatment of aphasia. San Diego, CA: Singuler Publishing Group. Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlm-Estabrooks, N. (Research Edition). Cognitive-linguistic quick test. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm-Estabrooks, N., Emery, P., & Albert, M. L. (1987). Treatment of Aphasic Perseveration (TAP) program. Archives of Neurology, 44, 1253–1255.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helm-Estabrooks, N. & Albert, M. (1991). Manual of aphasia therapy. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm-Estabrooks. N., Bayles, K., Ramage, A., & Bryant, S. (1995) The relationship between cognitive performance and aphasia severity, age and education: Females versus males. Brain and Language, 51 (1) 139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm-Estabrooks, N. & Holland, A L. (1998). Approaches to the treatment of aphasia. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotz, G. & Helm-Estabrooks, N. (1995). Perseveration. Part 1: A review. Brain Injury, 9 (2), 151–159.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, W., Wilmes, K., Poeck, K., Van Vleymen, B., & Deberdt, W. (1997). Piracetam as an adjuvant to language therapy for aphasia: A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabililation, 78, 245–250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughlings Jackson, J. (1878). On tlhe affections of speech from disease or the brain. Brain I, 304–330, 19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. (1988). A process approach to neuropsychological assessment. In T Boll & B. K. Bryant (Eds ), Clinical neuropsychological and brain function: Research, measurement and practice. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1984). The Boston naming test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPointe, L. L. (1083). Aphasia intervention in adults: Historical, present, and future approaches. In J. Miller, D. Yodel, & R. Schiefieldbusch (Eds.), Contemporary issues in language intervention. ASHA Reports 12 (pp. 127–136). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurence, S. & Stein, D. G. (1978). Recoveryfrom brain damage. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, L. (1947). Sodium amytal in treatment of aphasia. Archives ofNeurology and Psychiatry, 59, 357–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1970). Traumatic aphasia. The Hague: Mouton (Original work published 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1972). Aphasia reconsidered. Cortex, 8, 34–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacLennan, D. L., Nicholas, L. E., Morley, G. K., & Brookshire, R. H. (1991). The effects of bromocriptine on speech and language function in a man with transcortical motor aphasia. In T. E. Prescott (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology (Vol. 20, pp. 145–156). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, L., Clayton, M., Barrett, A., Schober-Peterson, D., & Rothi, L. (1998). Rehabilitation ofa case of pure alexia: Exploiting residual abilities. Journal of International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 36–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mettler, C. C. (1947). History of medicine. Philadelphia: Blakiston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. K. (1904). Treatment of aphasia by training. Journal of the American Medical Association, 43, 1940–1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mimura, M., Albert, M. L., & McNamara, P. (1995). Toward a pharmacotherapy for aphasia. In H. S. Kirshner (Ed.), Handbook of neurological speech and language disorders (pp. 465 482). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeser, M. & Helm-Estabrooks, N. (1985). CT scan lesion localization and response to Melodic Intonation Therapy with nonfluent aphasia cases. Cortex, 21,203–223.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H. E. (1976). A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex, 12, 313–324.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nettleson, J. & Lesser, R. (1991). Therapy for naming difficulties in aphasia: Application of a cognitive neuropsychological model. Journal ofNeurolingistics, 6 (2), 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orgogozo, J. M. (1998). Piracetam in the treatment of acute stroke. CNS Drugs Supplement, 1, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, K., Purell, C., & Morton, J. (1983). Facilitation of word retrieval in aphasia. In C. Code & D. J. Muller (Eds.), Aphasia therapy: Studies in language disabilities and remediation (pp. 76–87). London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peach, R. (1998). Daignostic considerations for aphasia. 19th Health South and Braintree Hospital Annual Conference on Head Injury and Stroke, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease, D. M. & Goodglass, H. (1978). The effects of cueing on picture naming in aphasia. Cortex, 14, 178–189.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poeck, K. (1982, May). Modern methods ofaphasia therapy. Paper presented at the 7th Annual Meeting of the Japanese CVD society, Hirosaki, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pondraza, B. L. & Darley, F. L. (1977). Effects of auditory prestimulation on naming in aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 20, 669–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poeck, K. (1998). Piracetam treatment in post-stroke aphasia. CNS Drugs, 1, 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothi, L. J. G. (1998). Cognitive disorders. Searching for the circumstances of effective treatment: Introduction by the symposium organizer. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Sociey, 4, 593–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothi, L. J. C. (1995). Behavioral compensation in the case of treatment of acquired language disorders resulting from brain damage. In R. A. Dixon & L. Backman (Eds.), Compensating for psychological deficits and declines. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabe, L., Leiguarda, R., & Starkstein, S. E. (1992). An open-label trial of bromocriptine in nonfluent aphasia. Neurology, 42, 1637–1638.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., Helm, N., & Albert, M. (1974). Aphasia rehabilitation resulting from Melodic Intonation Therapy. Cortex, 10, 303–316.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vleymen, R. (1998, August). The role ofpiracetam in post stroke aphasia. Paper presented at the 8th International Aphasia Rehabilitation Conference, Kwa Maritane, Pilanesburg National Park, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vignolo, L. A. (1964). Evolution of aphasia and language rehabilitation: A retrospective exploratory study. Cortex, 1, 344–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voinescu, I. & Gheorghita, N. (1973). Tratamentul afaziel cu imipramina. Neurologia Psihiatria Neurochirurgia, 18, 423–430.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voinescu, I. & Gheorghita, N. (1978). Adjuvant drug therapy with psychologopedic rehabilitation of aphasic patients, Revue Romaine de Medecine, 16 (3), 155–161.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1987). Wechsler memory scale-revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weniger, D. & Samo, M. T. (1990). The future of aphasia therapy: More than just new wine in old bottles? Aphasiology, 4 (4), 301–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. (1937). Process and achievement: A basic problem of education and developmental psychology. Harvard Educational Review, 7, 353–368.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Helm-Estabrooks, N. (2002). Neurobehavioral Models for Aphasia Rehabilitation. In: Connor, L.T., Obler, L.K. (eds) Neurobehavior of Language and Cognition. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46898-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-46898-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-7877-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-46898-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics