Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Level of Attention: Mediating Between the Stimulus and Perception

  • Chapter
Levels of Perception

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adelson, E. H. and Bergen, J. R. (1991). The plenoptic function and the elements of early vision. In M. Landy and J. A. Movshon (eds.), Computational Models of Visual Processing, pp. 3–20. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahissar, M. and Hochstein, S. (1997). Task difficulty and visual hierarchy: Counter-streams in sensory processing and perceptual learning. Nature, 387: 401–406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aks, D. J. and Enns, J. T. (1996). Visual search for size is influenced by a background texture gradient. J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Percept. and Perf., 22: 1467–1481.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, D., Hayhoe, M. and Pelz, J. (1995). Memory representations in natural tasks. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 7: 66–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, D., Hayhoe, M. and Pook, P. (1995). Deitic Codes for the Embodiment of Cognition. Technical Report 95.1, University of Rochester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, H. (1995). The neuron doctrine in perception. In M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences, pp. 415–435. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, B., Jolicoeur, P. and Cowan, W. B. (1996a). Distractor heterogeneity versus linear separability in colour visual search. Percept., 25: 1281–1294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, B., Jolicoeur, P. and Cowan, W. B. (1996b). Visual search for colour targets that are or are not linearly-separable from distractors. Vis. Res., 36: 1439–1466.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, B., Jolicoeur, P. and Cowan, W. B. (1998). The linear separability effect in color visual search: ruling out the additive color hypothesis. Percept. and Psychophys., 60: 1083–1093.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baylis, G. C. and Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: evidence for hierarchical coding of location. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. and Perf., 19: 451–470.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. (1966). Perceptual grouping produced by changes in orientation and shape. Science, 154: 538–540.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, S. J., Brelstaff, G., Nelson, K. and Troscianko, T. (1995). Is the richness of our visual world an illusion? Transsaccadic memory for complex scenes. Percept., 24: 10750–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psych. Rev., 96: 145–167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, D. H. and Freeman, W. T. (1997). Bayesian color constancy. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 14: 1393–1411.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, D. H., Wandell, B. A. and Chichilnisky, E.-J. (1993). Color constancy: from physics to appearance. Cur. Dir. in Psych. Sci., 2: 165–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, J. (1993). Shape-from-shading is independent of visual attention and may be a texton. Spatial Vis., 7: 311–322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, M. and Blake, R. (1990). Preattentive vision and perceptual groups. Percept., 19: 515–522.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breese, B. B. (1909). Binocular rivalry. Psych. Rev., 16: 410–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson-Radvansky, L. A. (1999). Memory for relational information across eye movements. Percept. and Psychophys., 61: 919–934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. C. (1982). Visual search with color. J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Percept. and Perf., 8: 127–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, P., Arguin, M. and Treisman, A. (1990). Effect of surface medium on visual search for orientation and size features. J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Percept. and Perf., 16: 479–492.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., and Ivry, R. B. (1989). Illusory conjunction inside and outside the focus of attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. and Perf., 15: 650–663.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., and Ivry, R. B. (1991). Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for coarse location mechanism of feature integration. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. and Perf., 17: 891–901.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T. and Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. J. Exp. Psych.: Gen., 129: 481–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Lollo, V., Lark, C. D. and Hogben, J. H. (1988). Separating visible persistence from retinal afterimages. Percept. and Psychophys., 44: 363–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J. and Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psych. Rev., 96: 433–458.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Zmura, M. (1991). Color in visual search. Vis. Res., 31: 951–966.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egly, R., Driver, J. and Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting attention between objects and loctions: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. J. Exp. Psych.: Gen., 123: 161–177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elder, J. and Zucker, S. (1993). The effect of contour closure on the rapid discrimination of two-dimensional shapes. Vis. Res., 33: 981–991. Enns, J. T. (1992). Sensitivity of early human vision to 3-D orientation in line drawings. Can. J. Psychol., 46: 143–169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enns, J. T. and Kingstone, A. (1995). Access to global and local properties in visual search for compound stimuli. Psych. Sci., 6: 283–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enns, J. T. and Rensink, R. A. (1990a). Scene based properties influence visual search. Science, 247: 721–723.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enns, J. T. and Rensink, R. A. (1990b). Sensitivity to three-dimensional orientation in visual search. Psych. Sci., 1: 323–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, D. H. and Ward, P. A. (1991). Asymmetries in oriented-line detection indicate two orthogonal filters in early vision. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B, 243: 75–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, D. H. and Westland, S. (1992). Fine structure in the orientation threshold function for preattentive line-target detection. Percept., 22 (Supp. 2 ECVP—Pisa): 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, D. H. and Westland, S. (1998). Multiple groups of orientation-selective visual mechanisms underlying rapid oriented-line detection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 265: 1605–1613.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, G., Grossberg, S. and Mingolla, E. (1994). Cortical dynamics of feature binding and reset: control of visual persistence. Vis. Res., 34: 1089–1104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. T. (1994). The generic viewpoint assumption in a framework for visual perception. Nature, 368: 542–545.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist, I. D., Jane, R. M. and Heiko, N. (1997). Luminance and edge information in grouping: a study using visual search. J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Percept. and Perform., 23: 464–480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, M. (1998). What’s in a location? Comparing object-based and space-based models of feature integration in visual search. J. Exp. Psych.: Gen., 127: 189–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, B. F. and Anderson, L. K. (1956). Color coding in a visual search task. J. Exp. Psychol., 51: 19–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Akins (ed.) Perception, pp. 89–110. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayhoe, M. M., Bensinger, D. G. and Ballard, D. H. (1998). Task constraints in visual working memory. Vis. Res., 38: 125–137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Helmholtz, H. (1924). Treatise on Physiological Optics, J. P. C. Southall, Trans. Trans. from 3rd German ed. of 1909, ed.). Rochester, NY: The Optical Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. M. (1997). Transsaccadic memory and integration during real-world object perception. Psych. Sci., 8: 51–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, A. and Henderson, J. M. (2001). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. J. Exp. Psychol: Hum. Percept. and Perf., in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houck, M. R. and Hoffman, J. E. (1986). Conjunction of color and form without attention. Evidence from an orientation-contingent color aftereffect. J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Percept. and Perf., 12: 186–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Intraub, H. (1980). Presentation rate and the representation of briefly glimpsed pictures in memory. J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Learn. and Mem., 6: 1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D. E. (1996). Integrating information across saccadic eye movements. Cur. Dir. in Psych. Sci., 5: 94–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D. E., Yantis, S. and Jonides, J. (1983). Evidence against visual integration across saccadic eye movements. Percept. Psychophys., 34: 49–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, D. E., Zacks, J. L. and Brown, J. S. (1990). Visual memory and the perception of a stable visual environment. Percept. Psychophys., 47: 35–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julesz, B. and Bergen, J. R. (1983). Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perceptions of textures. Bell Sys. Tech. J., 62: 1619–1646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karn, K. and Hayhoe, M. (2000). Memory representations guide targeting eye movements in a natural task. Vis. Cog., 7: 673–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellman, P. (1998). An Update on Gestalt Psychology, Perception, Cognition, and Language: Essays in Honor of Henry and Lila Gleitman, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleffner, D., Polichar, V. E. and Ramachandran, V. S. (1990). Shape from shading affects motion perception and brightness constancy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 31: 524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleffner, D. A. and Ramachandran, V. S. (1992). On the perception of shape from shading. Percept. Psychophys., 52: 18–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kristjansson, A. and Tse, P. U. (2001). Curvature discontinuities are cues for rapid shape analysis. Percept. Psychophys., 41: 390–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamme, V. A. F., Super, H. and Spekreijse, H. (1998). Feedforward, horizontal, and feedback processing in the visual cortex. Cur. Opinion in Neurobiol., 8: 529–535.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. S. (1995). A Bayesian framework for understanding texture segmentation in the primary visual cortex. Vis. Res., 35: 2643–2657.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lettvin, J. (1995). J. Y. Lettvin on grandmother cells. In M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences, pp. 434–435. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. (1992). Attention and preattention in theories of automaticity. Am. J. Psych., 105: 317–339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mack, A. and Rock, I. (1998a). Inattentional Blindness. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, A. and Rock, I. (1998b). Inattentional blindness: perception without attention. In R. D. Wright (ed.) Visual Attention, pp. 55–76. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. M. and Wolfe, J. M. (2000). Getting beyond the serial/parallel debate in visual search: a hybrid approach. In K. Shapiro (ed.) The Limits of Attention: Temporal Constraints on Human Information Processing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraglia, G. (1989). Display organization and the detection of horizontal lines segments. Percept. Psychophys., 45: 265–272.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, A. L. and Sanchez, R. R. (1990). Critical color differences determined with a visual search task. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 7: 1209–1217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama, K. and Shimojo, S. (1992). Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. Science, 257: 1357–1363.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton, Century, Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. I. (1974). Motion sensitivity in peripheral vision. Percept., 3: 151–152.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, E. and DeSchepper, B. G. (1992). An inhibition-based fan effect: evidence for an active suppression mechanism in selective attention. Canad. J. Psych., 46: 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nothdurft, H. C. (1993). Saliency effects across dimensions in visual search, Vis. Res., 33: 839–844.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noton, D. and Stark, L. (1971). Eye movements and visual perception. Sci. Am., 224: 35–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, K. M. and Treisman, A. M. (1990). Is all orientation created equal? Invest. Ophth. Vis. Sci., 31: 106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliva, A. and Torralba, A. (2001). Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation of the spatial envelope. Int. J. Comp. Vis., 42: 145–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, J. K. and Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behav. and Brain Sci., 24:.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, K. (1992). Solving the ‘real’ mysteries of visual perception. The world as an outside memory. Canad. J. Psych., 46: 461–488.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Previc, F. H. and Naegele, P. D. (2001). Target-tilt and vertical-hemifield asymmetries in free-scan search for 3-D targets. Percept. Psychophys., 41: 445–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S. (1988). Perception of shape from shading. Nature, 331: 163–165.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rensink, R. A. (2000). Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing. Vis. Res., 40: 1469–1487.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rensink, R. and Cavanagh, P. (1993). Processing of shadows at preattentive levels. Invest. Ophthal. Vis. Sci., 34: 1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensink, R. and Cavanagh, P. (1994). Identification of highlights in early vision. Invest. Ophthal. Vis. Sci., 35: 1623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensink, R. A. and Enns, J. T. (1995). Pre-emption effects in visual search: evidence for low-level grouping. Psych. Rev., 102: 101–130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rensink, R., O’Regan, J. K. and Clark, J. J. (1996). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psych. Sci., 8: 368–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rock, I. and Palmer, S. (1990). The legacy of Gestalt psychology. Sci. Am., 263: 84–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roelfsema, P. R., Lamme, V. A. F. and Spekreijse, H. (1998). Object-based attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. Nature, 395: 376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, D. J. (2000). Change Blindness and Visual Memory. A special issue of Vis. Cog., Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, D. J. and Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cog. Sci., 1: 261–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J. and Perona, P. (1996a). Early computation of shape and reflectance in the visual system. Nature, 379: 165–168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J. and Perona, P. (1996b). Where is the sun? Invest. Ophth. Vis. Sci., 37: S935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theeuwes, J. and Kooi, J. L. (1994). Parallel search for a conjunction of shape and contrast polarity. Vis. Res., 34:3013–3016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, S., Fize, D. and Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381: 520–552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tipper, S. P. and Weaver, B. (1998). The medium of attention: location-based, object-based, or scene-based? In R. D. Wright (ed.) Visual Attention, pp. 77–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M. and Burak, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Percep. Perf., 20: 478–499.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. (1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Percep. Perf., 8: 194–214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem. Cur. Op. Neurobiol., 6: 171–178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. and Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psych. Rev., 95: 15–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. and Souther, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of seperable features. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 114: 285–310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. M. and Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cogn. Psych., 14: 107–141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsotsos, J. K. (1988). A “complexity level” analysis of immediate vision. Int. J. Comp. Vis., 2: 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsotsos, J. K. (1993). An inhibitory beam for attentional selection. In L. Harris and M. Jenkin (eds.) Spatial Vision in Humans and Robots, pp. 313–331).: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsotsos, J. K., Culhane, S., Wai, W. Y. K., Lai, Y., Davis, N. and Nuflo, F. (1995). Modeling visual attention via selective tuning. Artif. Intel., 78: 507–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rullen, R. and Thorpe, S. J. (2001). Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Ultra-rapid visual categorisation of natural and artifactual objects. Percept., 30: 655–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. (1966). The effect of target specification on objects fixed during visual search. Percept. Psychophys., 1: 315–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. (1985). Tunnel vision induced by a foveal load manipulation. Hum. Fact., 27: 221–227.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M. (1986). Stereopsis and binocular rivalry. Psych. Rev., 93: 269–282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M. (1992). “Effortless” texture segmentation and “parallel” visual search are not the same thing. Vis. Res., 32: 757–763.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (ed.) Attention, pp. 13–74. Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M. (2000). Post-attentive vision and the illusion of perception. Paper presented at “Toward a Science of Consciousness”, Tuscon, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M. (2001). Asymmetries in visual search: an introduction. Percept. Psychophys., 63: 381–389.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M. and Bennett, S. C. (1997). Preattentive object files: shapeless bundles of basic features. Vis. Res., 37: 25–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R. and Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perf., 15: 419–433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M. and Franzel, S. L. (1988). Binocularity and visual search. Percept. Psychophys., 44: 81–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M. and Friedman-Hill, S. R. (1992a). On the role of symmetry in visual search. Psych. Sci., 3: 194–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M. and Friedman-Hill, S. R. (1992b). Visual search for orientation: the role of angular relations between targets and distractors. Spat. Vis., 6: 199–208.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M., Friedman-Hill, S. R., Stewart, M. I. and O’Connell, K. M. (1992). The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Percept. Perf., 18: 34–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M., Klempen, N. and Dahlen, K. (2000). Post-attentive vision. J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Percept. Perf., 26: 693–716.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M., Yee, A. and Friedman-Hill, S. R. (1992). Curvature is a basic feature for visual search. Percept., 21: 465–480.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yantis, S. and Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Percept. Perf., 20: 95–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yantis, S. and Jonides, J. (1996). Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: New perceptual objects or visual masking. J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Percept. Perf., 22: 1505–1513.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Jeremy M. Wolfe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, M3J IP3, Canada

    Laurence Harris

  2. Department of Computer Science, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, M3J IP3, Canada

    Michael Jenkin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wolfe, J.M. (2003). The Level of Attention: Mediating Between the Stimulus and Perception. In: Harris, L., Jenkin, M. (eds) Levels of Perception. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22673-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-22673-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-95525-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-22673-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation