Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research ((HSSR))

  • 1226 Accesses

Abstract

Social control can be exerted in many ways, from the raising of an eyebrow to the murder of someone in a self-help “moralistic killing” (Black, 1999) to right some perceived wrong that has been visited on a person, their family, or clan. Donald (Donald Black, 1976, Donald Black, 1999), building on the earlier work of Durkheim and of Weber even as he criticizes them, offers four major types of social control (Black, 1999, pp. 6–9), including penal, compensatory, therapeutic, and conciliatory, with the end goal of each being, respectively, punishment, restitution, treatment, and dispute resolution. These types of social control, all of which may involve applications of formal law, will be referred to herein, to characterize various approaches to exerting social control over religion and religious groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anthony, D. (1999). Pseudoscience and minority religions: An evaluation of the brainwashing theories of Jean-Marie Abgrall. Social Justice Research, 12, 421–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, D. (1990). Religious movements and brainwashing litigation: Evaluating key testimony. In T. Robbins & D. Anthony (Eds.), In Gods we trust (2nd ed., pp. 295–344). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, D., & Robbins, T. (1992). Law, social science, and the “brainwashing” exception to the First Amendment. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 10, 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, D., & Robbins, T. (1995). Negligence, coercion, and the protection of religious belief. Journal of Church and State, 37, 509–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, E. (1989). New religious movements: A practical introduction. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, E. (1984). The making of a Moonie: Brainwashing or choice? Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckford, J. A. (2002). Banal discrimination: Equality of respect for beliefs and worldviews in the UK. In D. Davis & G. Besier (Eds.), International perspectives on freedom and equality of religious belief. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1999). The social structure of right and wrong. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1976). The behavior of law. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D., & Baumgartner, M. P. (1999). Toward a theory of the third party. In D. Black (Ed.), The structure of right and wrong (pp. 95–124). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradney, A. (1999). Children of a newer God: The English courts, custody disputes, and NRMs. In S. Palmer & C. Hardman (Eds.), Children and new religions (pp. 210–226). New Brunswick: NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. (1983). Conservatorships and deprogramming: Legal and political perspectives. In D. Bromley & J. T. Richardson (Eds.), The brainwashing/deprogramming controversy (pp. 267–293). New York: Edwin Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D., & Robbins, T. (1993). The role of government in regulating new and unconventional religions. In J. Wood & D. Davis (Eds.), The role of government in monitoring and regulating religion in public life (pp. 205–240). Waco, TX: Baylor University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, L. (1990). Charisma and control in Rajneeshpuram. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, W. (1964). A sociological analysis of the law of vagrancy. Social Problems, 12, 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, W., & Zatz, M. (1993). Making Law. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, M. (1993). Evidence as partisanship. Law and Society Review, 28, 833–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coté, P., & Richardson, J. T. (2001). Disciplined litigation, vigilant litigation, and deformation: Dramatic organization change in Jehovah’s Witnesses. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, J., Richardson, J. T., & Warner, L. (1996). Novel scientific evidence in controversial cases: A social psychological analysis. Law and Psychology Review, 21, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, B., & Richardson, J. T. (2003). Falon Gong and the law: Development of legal social control in China. Nova Religio, 6, 312–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emory, M., & Zelenak, L. (1985). The tax exempt status of communitarian religious organizations: An unnecessary controversy? In T. Robbins, W. Shepherd, & J. McBride (Eds.), Cults, Culture, and the Law (pp. 177–204). Chico, CA: Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinn, F. (1987). Criminalizing conversion: The legislative assault on new religions. In J. M. Day & W. S. Laufer (Eds.), Crime, values, and religion (pp. 153–192). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, G., & Richardson, J. T. (1998). “Brainwashing” evidence in light of Daubert. In H. Reece (Ed.), Law and science (pp. 265–288). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, J. (1985). The legislative assault on new religions. In T. Robbins, W. Shepherd, & J. McBride (Eds.), Cults, culture, and the law (pp. 101–110). Chico, CA: Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer, M. (1999). The precarious balance between freedom of religion and best interests of the child. In S. Palmer & C. Hardman (Eds.), Children and new religions (pp. 187–209). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, G. (1986). Brainwashing: The myth and actuality. Thought: A Review of Culture and Ideas, 61, 241–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeMoult, J. (1983). Deprogramming members of religious sects. In D. Bromley & J. T. Richardson (Eds.), The brainwashing/deprogramming controversy (pp. 234–257). New York: Edwin Mellen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S. (1999). Frontiers and families: The children of Island Pond. In S. Palmer & C. Hardman (Eds.), Children in new religions (pp. 153–171). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S., & Hardman, C. (1999). Children in new religions. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pheifer, J. (1999). Perceptual biases and mock juror decision-making: Minority religions in court. Social Justice Research, 12, 409–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H. (1984). Constitutional issues in the case of Rev. Moon. New York: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (1991). Cult/brainwashing cases and the freedom of religion. Journal of Church and State, 33, 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (1992). Public opinion and the tax evasion trial of Reverend Moon. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 10, 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (1995a). Legal status of minority religions in the United States. Social Compass, 42, 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (1995b). Minority religions (“cults”) and the law: Comparisons of the United States, Europe, and Australia. University of Queensland Law Journal, 18, 183–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (1996a). “Brainwashing” claims and minority religions outside the United States: Cultural diffusion of a questionable legal concept in the legal arena. Brigham Young University Law Review, 873–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (1996b). Sociology and the new religions: “Brainwashing,” the courts, and religious freedom. In P. Jenkins & S. Kroll-Smith (Eds.), Witnessing for sociology (pp. 115–134). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (1998a). Accidental expert. Nova Religio, 2, 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (1998b). Law and minority religions: “Positive” and “negative” uses of the legal system. Nova Religio, 2, 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (1999). Social control of new religions: From “brainwashing” claims to child sex abuse accusations. In S. Palmer & C. Hardman (Eds.), Children in new religions (pp. 172–186). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (2000). Discretion and discrimination in legal cases involving controversial religious groups and allegations of ritual abuse. In R. Ahdar (Ed.), Law and religion. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (2001). Law, social control, and minority religions. In P. Cote (Ed.), Chercheurs de dieux dans l’espace [Public-frontier religions in public space] (pp. 139–198). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (2004a). Regulating religion: Case studies from around the globe. New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. (2004b). State and federal cooperation in regulating new religions: Oregon versus the Bhagwan Rajneesh. In J. T. Richardson (Ed.), Regulating religion (pp. 477–490). New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T., & DeWitt, J. (1992). Christian Science spiritual healing, the law, and public opinion. Journal of Church and State, 34, 549–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T., & Edelman, B. (2004). Cult controversies and legal developments concerning new religions in Japan and China. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Regulating religion (pp. 359–380). New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T., & Garay, A. (2004). The European Court of Human Rights and Former Communist State. In D. M. Jeroliniov, S. Zrinščak, & Irena Borowik (Eds.), Religion and Patterns of Social Transformation (pp. 223–234) Zagreb: Institute of Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T., & Introvigne, M. (2001). “Brainwashing” theories in European parliamentary and administrative reports on “cults and sects.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 143–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T., & Kilbourne, B. (1983). Classical and contemporary applications of brainwashing models: A comparison and critique. In D. Bromley & J. T. Richardson (Eds.), The brainwashing/deprogramming controversy (pp. 29–46). New York: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, T. (1998). In B. Zablocki & T. Robbins (Eds.), Misunderstanding Cults. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, C. (1991). Inquisition: The persecution and prosecution of the Reverend Sun Myung Moon. Washington, DC: Regnary Gateway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shterin, M., & Richardson, J. T. (2002). The Yakunin v. Dworkin trial and the emerging religious pluralism in Russia. Religion in Eastern Europe, 22, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shterin, M., & Richardson, J. T. (2000). Effects of the Western anti-cult movement on development of laws concerning religion in post-communist Russia. Journal of Church and State, 42, 247–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shterin, M., & Richardson, J. T. (1998). Local laws on religion in Russia: Precursors of Russia’s national law. Journal of Church and State, 40, 319–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shupe, A., & Bromley, D. (1994). Anti-cult movements in cross-cultural perspective. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shupe, A., & Bromley, D. (1980). The new vigilantes. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swatko, J. (2004). The Twelve Tribes Messianic Communities, the anti-cultmovement, and governmental response. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Regulating religion (pp. 179–200). New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wah, C. (2003). Restrictions on religious training and exposure in child custody and visitation orders: Do they protect or harm the child? Journal of Church and State, 45, 765–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wah, C. (2001). Jehovah’s Witnesses and child custody cases in the United States 1996–1998. Review of Religious Research, 42, 372–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wah, C. (1995). The custodial parent’s right to control religious training: Absolute or limited? American Journal of Family Law, 9, 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richardson, J.T. (2006). Law. In: Ebaugh, H.R. (eds) Handbook of Religion and Social Institutions. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23789-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics