Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, S.E., and Williams, L.J. (1996). Interpersonal, job, and individual factors related to helping processes at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 282–296.
Bowers, C.A., Pharmer, J.A., and Salas, E. (2000). When member homogeneity is needed in work teams: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 31, 305–327.
Brewer, M.B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.
Brickson, S. (2000). The impact of identity orientation on individual and organizational outcomes in demographically diverse settings. Academy of management Review, 25, 82–101.
Byrne, D.E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
Campion, M.A., Medsker, G.J., and Higgs, C.A. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823–850.
Deutsch, M. (1949). An experimental study of the effects of cooperation and competition upon group process. Human Relations, 2, 199–231.
Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Gaertner, S.L., Mann, J.A., Dovidio, J.F., Murrell, A.J., and Pomare, M. (1990). How does cooperation reduce intergroup bias? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 692–704.
Hackman, J.R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hayes, L.A. (1976). The use of group contingencies for behavioral control: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 628–648.
Hogg, M.A., and Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
Jehn, K.E., Northcraft, G.B., and Neale, M.A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741–763.
Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, Minn.: Interaction Book.
Kiggundu, M.N. (1983). Task interdependence and job design: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31, 145–172.
Lindenberg, S.M. (1998). Solidarity: Its microfoundations and macro-dependence. A framing approach. In P. Doreian and T.J. Fararo (Eds.), The problem of solidarity: Theories and models (pp. 61–112). Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.
Miller, L.K., and Hamblin, R.L. (1963). Interdependence, differential rewarding, and productivity. American Sociological Review, 28, 768–777.
Milliken, J.F., and Martins, L.L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402–433.
Mudrack, P.E. (1989). Group cohesiveness and productivity: A closer look. Human Relations, 42, 771–785.
Murnighan, J.K., and Conlon, D.E. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 165–186
Northcraft, G.B., Polzer, J.T., Neale, A.M., and Kramer, R.M. (1995). Diversity, social identity, and performance: Emergent social dynamics in cross-functional teams. In S.E. Jackson and M.N. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in work teams: research paradigms for a changing workplace (pp. 69–96). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
O’Leary-Kelly, A.M., Martocchio, J.J., and Frink, D.D. (1994). A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of management Review, 37, 1285–1301.
Pearce, J.L., and Gregersen, H.B. (1991). Task interdependence and extrarole behavior: A test of the mediating effects of felt responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 838–844.
Pettigrew, T.F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.
Rosenbaum, M.E., Moore, D.L., Cotton, J.L., Cook, M.S., Hieser, R.A., Shovar, M.N. et al. (1980). Group productivity and process: Pure and mixed reward structures and task interdependence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 626–642.
Saavedra, R., Earley, P.C., and Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61–72.
Shaw, M.E. (1973). Small group tasks: A method for dimensional analysis. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 3 (MS No. 294).
Shea, G.P., and Guzzo, R.A. (1987). Groups as human resources. In G.R. Ferris and K.M. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 323–356). Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K.P., and Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120–133.
Thomas, E.J. (1957). Effects of facilitative role interdependence on group functioning. Human Relations, 10, 347–366.
Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tsui, A.S., Egan, T.D., and O’Reilly, C.A. III, (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549–579.
Tsui, A.S., and Gutek, B. (1999). Demographic differences in organizations: Current research and future directions. New York: Lexington Books/Macmillan.
Turner, J.C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Turner, J.C., Oakes, P.J., Haslam, S.A., and McGarthy, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454–463.
Tyler, T.R., and Blader, S.L. (2001). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Essays in social psychology. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Van der Vegt, G.S., Emans, B.J.M., and Van de Vliert, E. (2000). Team members’ affective responses to intragroup interdependence and job complexity. Journal of Management, 26, 633–655.
Van der Vegt, G.S., Emans, B.J.M., and Van de Vliert, E. (2001). Patterns of interdependence in work teams: A two-level investigation of the relations with job and team satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 54, 51–69.
Van der Vegt, G.S., and Van de Vliert, E. (2005). Effects of perceived skill dissimilarity and task interdependence on helping in work teams. Journal of Management, 31(1), 73–89.
Van der Vegt, G.S., Van de Vliert, E., and Oosterhof, A. (2003). Informational dissimilarity and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of intrateam interdependence and team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 715–728.
Van Dyne, L., Graham, J.W., and Dienesch, R.M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 765–802.
Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145–180.
Wageman, R. (2001). The meaning of interdependence. In M.E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 197–217). Mahwah, N.J.: LEA.
Webber, S.S., and Donahue, L.M. (2001). Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 27, 141–162.
Williams, K., and O’Reilly, C. (1998). The complexity of diversity: A review of forty years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77–140.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van der Vegt, G., Flache, A. (2006). Understanding the Joint Effects of Interdependence and Diversity on Solidarity in Work Teams. In: Fetchenhauer, D., Flache, A., Buunk, B., Lindenberg, S. (eds) Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior. Critical Issues in Social Justice. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28032-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28032-4_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-28031-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-28032-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)