Skip to main content

Is Development as the Mutual Adaptation of Technology and Business Process

  • Conference paper
Information Systems Development
  • 701 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boehm, B. W., 1988, A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement, IEEE Computer, pp. 61–72 (May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfson, E., van Alstyne, M., Bernstein, A., and Renshaw, A. A., 1997, Tools for teaching Change Management, The Matrix of Change and Supporting Software, IAIM’97, Atlanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braa, K., and Vidgen, R., 1997, An Information Systems research framework for the organizational laboratory, in: Computers and Design in Context, M. Kyng and L. Mathiasen, eds., MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra, C., 2000, From Control to Drift, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coakes, E., and Elliman, T., 1999, The role of stakeholders in managing change, CAIS, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giaglis, G., 1999, On the integrated design and evaluation of business process and information systems, Communications of the AIS, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrety, K., Robertson, P. L., and Badham, R., 2001, Communities of Practice, Actor Networks and Learning in Development Projects, The Future of Innovation Studies, Eindhoven; http://www.tm.tue.nl/ecis/papers/ iii 4 2.pdf (accessed Jan 15 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson-Sellers, B., and Unhelkar, B., 2000, OPEN Modelling with UML, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, I., Booch, G., and Rumbaugh, R., 1999, The Unified Software Development Process, Reading, Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, I., Ericsson, M., and Jacobson, A., 1995, The Object Advantage: Business Process Reengineering with Object Technology, Addison-Wesley, ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D., 1988, Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization, Research Policy 17(5):251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D., and Sinha, D. K., 1993, Developer-user interaction and user satisfaction in internal technology transfer, Academy of Management Journal 36(5):1125–1139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, A., Rice, R., Malhotra, A., King, N., and Ba, S., 2000, Technology adaptation: The case of a computersupported inter-organizational virtual team, MIS Quarterly 24(4):569–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L., Benjamin, R., 1997, The Magic Bullet of IT-Enabled Transformation, Sloan Mangement Review, pp. 55–68 (Winter).

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, S., 1996, Rapid Application Development, Microsoft Press, Redmond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Microsoft, 2001, Microsoft Solutions Framework, 2001; http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/itsolutions/tandp/innsol/default.asp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M., 1994, Qualitative Data Analysis, Thousand Oaks, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S., Agarwal, R., and Tanniru, S., 1999, Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in information technology, MIS Quarterly 23(3):365–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngwenyama, O., 1998, Groupware, Social Action and Emergent Organizations: On the process dynamics of computer mediated distributed work, Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 8(2–3):127–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M., 1985, Contextualist Research and the Study of Organizational Change Processes, Research Methods in Information Systems, Mumford et al., eds., North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, B., and I. Benbasat, 2000, Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and technology objectives, MIS Quarterly 24(1):81–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C., and Willcocks, L. P., 2004, Strategic Alignment Revisited: Connecting Organizational Architecture and IT Infrastructure, Proceedings of HICSS, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyre, M. J., and Orlikowski, W., 1994, Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations, Organizational Science 5(1):98–118.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bygstad, B. (2005). Is Development as the Mutual Adaptation of Technology and Business Process. In: Vasilecas, O., Wojtkowski, W., Zupančič, J., Caplinskas, A., Wojtkowski, W.G., Wrycza, S. (eds) Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28809-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28809-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-25026-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-28809-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics