Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Systems and Control: Foundations & Applications ((SCFA))

Summary

Many distributed multiple access (MAC) protocols use an exponential backoff mechanism. In that mechanism, a node picks a random backoff time uniformly in an intervals that doubles in size after a collision. When used in an Ad-Hoc network, this backoff mechanism is unfair towards nodes in the middle of the network. Indeed, such nodes tend to experience more collisions than nodes with fewer neighbors; consequently, they often choose larger delays than those other nodes. We propose a different backoff mechanism that achieves a fairer allocation of the available bandwidth by decreasing the backoff delay upon collision or failure to send a packet. That is, a node becomes more aggressive after each failure. Accordingly, we call the mechanism the Impatient Backoff Algorithm (IBA). The nodes maintain the stability of the algorithm by resetting, in a distributed way, the average backoff delays when they become too small. We perform a Markov analysis of the system to prove stability and fairness in simple topologies. We also use simulations to study the performance of IBA in random Ad-Hoc networks and compare with an exponential backoff scheme. Results show that IBA achieves comparable mean throughput, while delivering significantly better fairness.

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under a NeTS grant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Li, C. Blake, D. S. J. De Couto, H. I. Lee, and R. Morris, Capacity of Ad Hoc Wireless Networks, Proceedings ACM Mobicom, Rome, Italy, July 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Gupta, J. Musacchio, and J. Walrand, Sufficient rate constraints for QoS flows in ad-hoc networks, UCB/ERL Technical Memorandum M04/42, Fall 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. IEEE Standard forWireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, P802.11, Nov 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. IEEE P802.11: The Working Group for Wireless LANs. http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Bianchi, Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 18(3):535–547, March 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Ergen and P. Varaiya, Throughput analysis and admission control for IEEE 802.11a, ACM-Kluwer MONET Special Issue on WLAN Optimization at the MAC and Network Levels, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Ergen and P. Varaiya, Throughput formulation and wlan optimization in mixed data rates for IEEE 802.11 DCF mode, GLOBECOM-CAMAD, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Ergen, B. Dundar, and P. Varaiya, Throughput analysis of an extended service set in 802.11, GLOBECOM, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Coleri, PEDAMACS: Power Efficient and Delay Aware Medium Access Protocol for Sensor Networks, Masters Thesis, Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences Department, University of California, Berkeley, December 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Bertsekas and R. Gallagher, Data Networks (2nd Edition), Prentice Hall, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Yuan and P. Marbach, Rate Control in Random Access Networks, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Kleinrock and F. Tobagi, Packet switching in radio channels, Part II: The hidden terminal problem in carrier sense multiple access and the busy tone solution, IEEE Transactions in Communications, COM-23(12):1417–1433, Dec 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F.P. Kelly, A. Maullo, and D. Tan, Rate control in communication networks: Shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49:237–252, March 1998.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Chiu and R. Jain, Analysis of the increase and decrease algorithms for congestion avoidance in computer networks, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 17:1–14, 1989.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. A.G. Pakes, Some conditions of ergodicity and reurrence of markov chains, Operations Research, 17:1058–1061, 1969.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Matlab Simulation Environment, The Mathworks Inc., http://www.mathworks.com.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gupta, R., Walrand, J. (2005). Achieving Fairness in a Distributed Ad-Hoc MAC. In: Abed, E.H. (eds) Advances in Control, Communication Networks, and Transportation Systems. Systems and Control: Foundations & Applications. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-8176-4409-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics