Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Systems and Control: Foundations & Applications ((SCFA))

Summary

This chapter gives an overview of simple controllers for SISO systems based on the generalization of the linear pole assignment method for constrained systems with dynamics ranging from relay minimum time systems to linear pole assignment systems. The design is based on splitting the nth-order system dynamics into n first-order ones, which can be constrained without any problems with stability and overshooting. It requires a successive decrease of the distance of the representative point from the next invariant set with lower dimension. Since the distance of the representative point to such invariant set can be defined in many ways, the construction of the constrained controllers is not unique. The controllers derived from the second-order integrator are simple, appropriate also for extremely fast application, and easy to tune by a procedure that generalizes the well-known methods by Ziegler and Nichols, or ?Aström and Hägglund, respectively.

This work has been partially supported by the Slovak Scientific Grant Agency, Grant No. 1/7621/20.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aström, KJ, Hägglund T (1984). Automatic tuning of simple regulators with specification of phase and amplitude margins. Automatica 20(5):645–651

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bemporad A, Morari M, Dua V, Pistikopoulos EN (2002). The explicit linear quadratic regulator for constrained systems. Automatica 38:3–20

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Föllinger O (1994). Regelungstechnik. 8. Auflage, Hüthig Buch Verlag Heidelberg

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Henrion D, Tarbouriech S, Kučera V (2001). Control of linear systems subject to input constraints: a polynomial approach. Automatica 37:597–604

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hippe P (2003). A new windup prevention scheme for stable and unstable systems. In: Proceedings of 2nd IFAC Conference on Control Systems Design’ 03, Bratislava, Slovak Republic

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huba M (1999). Dynamical classes in the minimum time pole assignment control. In: Computing anticipatory systems-CASYS’ 98. American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, NY

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huba M, Bisták P, Skachová Z, Žáková K (1998). P-and PD-controllers for I1 and I2 models with dead time. 6th IEEE Mediterranean Conference on Control and Systems, Alghero, Italy 514–519

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huba M, Bisták P (1999). Dynamic classes in the PID control. In: Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huba M, Sovišová D, Oravec I (1999). Invariant sets based concept of the pole assignment control. In: European Control Conference, VDI/VDE Düsseldorf, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huba M (2003). Constrained systems design. Vol. 1, Basic controllers. Vol. 2, Basic structures. STU Bratislava (in Slovak)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huba M (2003). The helicopter rack control, 11th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, Rhodes, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huba M. (2004). Gain scheduled constrained controller for SISO plants. In: Southeastern Europe, USA, Japan and EC Workshop on Research and Education in Control and Signal Processing REDISCOVER 2004, Cavtat, Croatia, 1:104–107

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huba M, Bisták P (2004). Constrained controllers based on the dynamics decomposition. In: Southeastern Europe, USA, Japan and EC Workshop on Research and Education in Control and Signal Processing REDISCOVER 2004, Cavtat, Croatia, 1:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huba M (2004). Gain scheduled constrained controller for SISO plants. IFAC Conf. NOLCOS 2004, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rönnbäck S (1996). Nonlinear dynamic windup detection in anti-windup compensators. Preprints CESA’ 96, Lille, 1014–1019

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ziegler JG, Nichols NB (1942). Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Trans. ASME, 759–768

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huba, M. (2006). Constrained Pole Assignment Control. In: Menini, L., Zaccarian, L., Abdallah, C.T. (eds) Current Trends in Nonlinear Systems and Control. Systems and Control: Foundations & Applications. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-8176-4470-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics