Conclusion
I have distinguished above nine distinct issues about equity and justice that arise in the construction and use of cost effectiveness analysis to minimize the burdens of disease and to maximize health outcomes. In each case the concern for equity is in my view valid and warrants some constraints on a goal of unqualified maximization of health outcomes. There has not been space here to pursue at all fully any of these nine issues regarding equity and justice — each is complex, controversial, and important. In each case, my point has been that there are important ethical and value choices to be made in constructing and using the measures; the choices are not merely technical, empirical, or economic, but moral and value choices as well. Each requires explicit attention by health policy makers using CEA. In a few cases I have indicated my own view about how the potential conflict between equity and utilitarian maximization might be resolved, but in other cases I have simply summarized briefly some arguments for giving the particular concern about equity some weight when it conflicts with maximization of utility. For some of these issues, the literature and research is at a relatively early stage and one cannot be confident about how the issues should be resolved or even about the range of plausible positions and supporting reasons on them. However, this is not grounds for ignoring the issues, but instead for getting to work on them and for ensuring that they receive explicit attention and deliberation in decisions about health resource prioritization and allocation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R.A., Carter, W.B., and Gibson, B.S.: 1981, The Sickness Impact Profile Development and Final Revision of a Health, Medical Care 19, 787–805.
Brock, D.W.: 1988, ‘Ethical issues in recipient selection for organ transplantation,’ in Organ Substitution Technology: Ethical, Legal, and Public Policy Issues (ed.), D. Mathieu, Westview Press, Boulder and London.
Brock, D.W.: 1989, ‘Justice, Health Care, and the Elderly,’ Philosophy & Public Affairs 18(3), 297–312.
Brock, D.W.: 1992, ‘Quality of Life Measures in Health Care and Medical Ethics,’ in A. Sen and M. Nussbaum (eds.), The Quality of Life, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Brock, D.W.: 1995, ‘Justice and ADA: Does Prioritizing and Rationing Health Care Discriminate against the Disabled?,’ Social Theory and Policy 12, 159–84.
Brock, D.W.: 2000, ‘Health Care Resource Prioritization and Discrimination Against Persons With Disabilities,’ in L. Francis and A. Silvers (eds.) Americans with Disabilities, Routledge, New York.
Brock, D.W.: 2002, ‘Priority to the Worst Off in Health Care Resource Prioritization,’ in M. Battin, R. Rhodes, and A. Silvers (eds.), Medicine and Social Justice, Oxford University Press, New York.
Broome, J.: 1984, ‘Selecting People Randomly,’ Ethics 95, 38–55.
Daniels, N.: 1988, Am I My Parents’ Keeper? An Essay on Justice Between the Young and the Old, Oxford University Press, New York.
Daniels, N.: 1993, ‘Rationing Fairly: Programmatic Considerations,’ Bioethics, 7/2–3, 224–233.
Daniels, N. and Sabin, J.: 1997, Limits to Health Care: Fair Procedures, Democratic Deliberation, and the Legitimacy Problem for Insurers, Philosophy and Public Affairs 26(4), 303–50
Gold, M.R. et. al.: 1996, Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, Oxford University Press, New York.
International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps: 1980, World Health Organization, Geneva.
Kamm, F.M.: 1993, Morality/Mortality. Volume One. Death and Whom to Save From It, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kaplan, R.M. and Anderson, J.P: 1988, ‘A General Health Policy Model: Update and Applications,’ Health Services Research, June 23, 203–35.
Keeler, E.B. and Cretin, S.: 1983, ‘Discounting of Life-Saving and Other Nonmonetary Effects,’ Management Science 29, 300–306.
Murray, C.J.L.: 1994, ‘Quantifying the Burden of Disease: the Technical Basis for Disability-Adjusted life years,’ in Global Comparative. Assessments in the Health Sector: Disease Burden, Expenditures and Intervention Packages, eds. C.J.L. Murray and A.D. Lopez, World Health Organization, Geneva.
Murray, C.J.M.: 1996, Rethinking DALYs, in The Global Burden of Disease: A Comprehension Assessment of Mortality and Disability From Disease, Injuries, and Risk Factors in 1990 and Projected to 2020, World Health Organization, Geneva.
Nord, E.: 1999, Cost-Value Analysis in Health Care: Making Sense of QALYs, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Nord, E.: 1993 ‘The trade-off between severity of illness and treatment effect in cost-value analysis of health care,’ Health Policy 24, 227–38.
Parfit, D.: 1991, ‘Equality or priority,’ The Lindley Lecture. Copyright: Department of Philosophy, University of Kansas.
Torrance, G.W. et al.: 1996 ‘Multi attribute preference functions for a comprehensive health status classification system.’ Medical Care 34:7, 702–722. Reprinted with permission of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Walzer, M.: 1983, Spheres of Justice, Basic Books, New York.
Ware, J.E. and Sherbourne, D.C.: 1992, “The MOS 36-item short form health survey,” Medical Care 30, 473–83.
Williams, A.: 1997, ‘Intergenerational Equity: An Exploration of the ‘Fair Innings’ Argument,’ Health Economics 6(2), 117–32.
World Bank: 1993, World Development Report 1993: Investing in Health, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brock, D. (2004). Ethical Issues in the Use of Cost Effectiveness Analysis for the Prioritization of Health Resources. In: Khushf, G. (eds) Handbook of Bioethics. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 78. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2127-5_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2127-5_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1870-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2127-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive