Skip to main content

Science and Technology Systems in Less Developed Countries

Identifying a Threshold Level and Focusing in the Cases of India and Brazil

  • Chapter
Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research

Abstract

Patent and scientific publication data offer useful information for the analysis of key features of national systems of innovation of less developed countries. However, the use of these statistics should be subjected to careful evaluation. This chapter uses data for 120 countries (patents, scientific papers, and GDP), investigating different patterns of interactions between science and technology according to different levels of development. Later this chapter focuses on the data for India and Brazil, investigating interactions between science and technology in three dimensions: inter-sectoral, inter-regional, and inter-temporal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aboites, J. (1996). Analysis of patenting activity in Mexico (Preliminary draft). Mexico (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque, E. (2000). Domestic patents and developing countries: arguments for their study and data from Brazil (1980–1995). Research Policy, 29 (9), 1047–1060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A.H. (2001). The rise of “the rest”: challenges to the West from late-industrializing economies. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R., Sala-I-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardes, A., Albuquerque, E. (2003). Cross-over, thresholds and the interactions between science and technology: lessons for less developed countries. Research Policy, 32 (5), 867–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe, D., Helpman, E., Hoffmaister, A. (1995). North-South R&D spillovers. Cambridge, MA: NBER Working Paper 5048.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Costa, A.P. (2002). Uneven and combined development: understanding India’s software exports. World Development, 31 (1), 211–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 27, Sept.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J. (1994). Technology and international differences in growth rates. Journal of Economic Literature, 32, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, H. (1998). Foundations of the Economics of Innovation: theory, measurement and practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattimore, R., Revesz, J. (1996). Australian science: performance from published papers. Bureau of Industry Economics, Report 96/3, Canberra: Australian Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIT/SOFTEX (2002). Indústria de software no Brasil: fortalecendo a economia do conhecimento. Campinas: SOFTEX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Observatoire des Sciences et des Téchniques (2000). Science & Technologie: indicateurs 2000. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002). Benchmarking industry-science relationships. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P., Pavitt, K. (1995). Patterns of technological activity: their measurement and interpretation. In P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1998). The social shape of the national science base. Research Policy, 27 (8), 793–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAJESWARI, A.R. (1996). Indian patent statistics — An analysis. Scientometrics, 36 (1), 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelin, B., Sarafoglou, N. (2003). Language and scientific publication statistics: a note. Language problems and language planning (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, L. (2003). Padrões de interação entre ciência e tecnologia. Dissertação de Mestrado. Belo Horizonte: Cedeplar-UFMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Government of the Republic of South Africa (2002). South Africa’s national research and development strategy. Pretoria: The Government of the Republic of South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velho, L. (1987). The author and the beholder: how paradigm commitments can influence the interpretation of research results. Scientometrics, 11 (1–2), 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viotti, E., Macedo, M.M. (2003). Indicadores de ciência, tecnologia e inovação no Brasil. Campinas: Editora Unicamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2003). World Bank Indicators (available at www.worldbank.org/wdi).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

da Motta e Albuquerque, E. (2004). Science and Technology Systems in Less Developed Countries. In: Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics