Skip to main content

The Use of Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policymaking in the U.S.

  • Chapter
The Handbook of Environmental Voluntary Agreements

Part of the book series: Environment & Policy ((ENPO,volume 43))

Abstract

The use of voluntary approaches to achieve environmental improvements has grown dramatically in the United States (U.S.) since they were first introduced thirteen years ago. As of 2004, there are over 50 voluntary programs in the U.S. at the federal level alone. These programs take a variety of forms, from large, cross-industry efforts to reduce global climate impacts to smaller, “boutique” efforts aimed at specific industrial sectors. Other voluntary approaches used in the U.S. include negotiated agreements, industry-initiated unilateral commitments, and state and regional voluntary initiatives, but these tend to be used less regularly.

Despite the diversity of voluntary approaches in the U.S., they often pursue common, and sometimes overlapping environmental objectives and use similar methodologies to achieve such goals. While most voluntary initiatives in the U.S. state an explicit environmental goal, they may also have less direct policy objectives such as enhancing innovation or increasing awareness of environmental issues.

Many argue in favour of the increased use of voluntary approaches in environmental policymaking on the basis of environmental effectiveness, economic efficiency, reductions in government administrative, monitoring and enforcement costs, increases in environmental awareness, and encouragement of innovation. Few programs have been evaluated properly on the basis of these objectives, however. The empirical literature sheds little light on the value of voluntary approaches in achieving goals set by U.S. environmental policy. The difficulty in evaluating voluntary approaches lies in sorting through the myriad of programs, identifying a discernible environmental goal, gathering adequate data for analysis, and measuring achievement of the environmental goal relative to a reasonable baseline scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

9. References

  • Alberini, A., & K. Segerson, K. (2002). Assessing Voluntary Programs to Improve Environmental Quality. Environmental and Resource Economics, 22, 157–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, S., &. Cason, T. (1995). An Experiment in Voluntary Environmental Regulation: Participation in EPA's 33/50 Program. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(3), 271–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, S., & Gangopadhyay, S. (1995). Toward a Theoretical Model of Voluntary Overcompliance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 28(3), 289–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizer, K. (1999). Voluntary Agreements: Cost-Effective or Smokscreen for Failure? Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2(2), 147–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, A., & Mazurek, J. (2001). The Cost of Developing Site-Specific Environmental Regulations: Evidence from EPA's Project XL. Environmental Management, 27(1), 109–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J. (1998). Searching for the Profit in Pollution Prevention: Case Studies in the Corporate Evaluation of Environmental Opportunities. Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, No. 98–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brau, R., & Carraro, C. (1999). Voluntary Approaches, Market Structure, and Compeition. CAVA Working Paper, No 99/08/01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui, L. (2003). Public Disclosure of Private Information as a Tool for Regulating the Environment: Firm Level Responses by Petroleum Refineries to the Toxic Releases Inventory. Working Paper, Boston University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Climate Exchange (2004). Chicago Climate Exchange: About CCX. Retrieved Feb. 29, 2004 from www.chicagoclimatex.com/about

    Google Scholar 

  • Croci, E. (2003). Voluntary Agreements for CO 2 Emissions Reduction, Evaluation & Perspectives. Energy & Environment, 14(5), 663–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnall, N., & Carmin, J. (2004). Greener and Cleaner? The Signaling Accuracy of U.S. Voluntary Environmental Programs, Working Paper, North Carolina State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCanio, S. (1994). Energy Efficiency and Managerial Performance: Improving Profitability while Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions. In D. Feldman (ed.), Global Climate Change and Public Policy. (pp. 86–101). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M., & Mazurek, J. (2003). A Transaction Cost Perspective on Negotiated Agreements: The Case of the U.S. EPA XL Program. In A. Baranzini, and P. Thalmann (eds.), Voluntary Approaches to Climate Protection. An Economic Assessment of Private-Public Partnerships. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M., & Terlaak, A. (2002a). The Institutional Factors of Environmental Voluntary Agreements. In Hoffman and Ventresca (eds.), Organizations, Policy, and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives. (pp. 346–366). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fierman, J. (1991). The Big Muddle in Green Marketing. Fortune, June 3, 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Accounting Office, GAO (1994). Toxic Substances: EPA Needs More Reliable Source Reduction Data and Progress Measures. Washington, DC: GAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAO (1997). Challenges Facing EPA's Efforts to Reinvent Environmental Regulation. Washington DC: GAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAO (1997). Information on the Results of Four of EPA's Voluntary Climate Change Programs. Washington DC: GAO

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanchant, M. (1996). The Cost Efficiency of Voluntary Agreements for Regulating Industrial Pollution: A Coasean Approach. In C. Carraro and F. Leveques (eds.), Voluntary Approaches in Environmental Policy. Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, R. (1988). Self-Selection Bias in the Evolution of Voluntary Energy Conservation Programs. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(3), 448–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, M. (2004). Electricity Intensity in the Commercial Sector: Market and Public Program Effects. Energy Journal, 25(2), 115–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, M. (2001). Economic Indicators of Market Transformation: Energy Efficiency Lighting and EPA's Green Lights. Energy Journal, 22(4), 95–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J., Nash, J., & Ehrenfeld, J. (2000). Standard or Smokescreen? Implementation of a Voluntary Environmental Code. California Management Review, 42(2), 63–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Inform (1995). Toxics Watch, 1995. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappas, P. (1997). Industry Self-Regulation and Environmental Protection, Working Paper, University of California — Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, M, &. Damon, L. (1999). EPA's Voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on Toxic Releases and Economic Performance of Firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A., & Lenox, M. (2000). Industry Self-Regulation Without Sanction: The Chemical Industries' Responsible Care Program. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 243–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konar, S., & Cohen, M. (1997). Information as Regulation: The Effect of Community Right to Know Laws on Toxic Emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32(1), 109–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konar, S., & Cohen, M. (2001). Does the Market Value Environmental Performance. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), 281–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, S., Lyon, T., & Maxwell, J. (2000). Quality Leadership When Regulatory Standards Are Forthcoming. Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(3), 331–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, T., & Maxwell, J. (2001). Voluntary Approaches to Environmental Protection. In M. Franzini and A. Nicita (eds.), Environmental Economics: Past, Present and Future. Aldershot, Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, T., & Maxwell, J. (2003). Self-Regulation, Taxation, and Public Voluntary Environmental Agreements. Journal of Public Economics, 87(7–8), 1453–1486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maitland, I. (1985). The Limits of Business Self-Regulation. California Management Review, 27(3, 132–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J., & Lyon, T. (1999). An Institutional Analysis of US Voluntary Environmental Agreements, Working Paper. Indiana University, 99–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J., Lyon, T., & Hackett, S. (2000). Self-Regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism. Journal of Law and Economics, 43(2), 583–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazurek, J. (1998). The Use of Voluntary Agreements in the United States: An Initial Survey. Paris: OECD, ENV/EPOC/GEE (98)27/Final.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern, R. & Al-Jurf, S. (1999). Does the Provision of Free Technical Information Really Influence Firm Behaviour? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 61, 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau, L., Cantin, J., & Wells, R. (2003). Participation in Voluntary Programs, Corporate Reputation, and Intangible Value: Estimating the Value of Paticipating in the EPA's EnergyStar Program. Working Paper, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. (2002). Industry Codes of Practice: Emergence and Evolution. In T. Dietz and P. Sterns (eds.), New Tools for Environmental Protection: Education, Information, and Voluntary Measures. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Public Administration, NAPA (1997). Resolving the Paradox of Environmental Protection. Washington, DC: NAPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment (1991). Changing by Degrees: Steps to Reduce Greenhouse Gases. Washington, DC: OTA, OTA-O-482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD (1999). Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy: An Assessment. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2003). Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policy: Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Usage in Policy Mixes. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozog, M., & Waldman, D. (1994). Weighting Nonrandom Samples in Voluntary Energy Conservation Program Evaluation. Energy Journal, 15(1), 129–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerson, K., & Miceli, T. (1998). Voluntary Environmental Agreements: Good or Bad News for Environmental Protection? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36(2), 109–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. EPA (1996). 1994 Toxics Release Inventory, Public Data Release. Washington, D.C: EPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (2002). Achievement Through Partnership: A Progress Report Through 2000. Washington, DC: EPA, EPA-240R-02-001.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (2004a). Partners for the Environment: List of Programs. Retrieved Feb. 11, 2004 from www.epa.gov/partners/programs/index.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (2004b). EPA's Energy Star: The Quality of Our Environment Is Everyone's Responsibility. Retrieved Feb. 24, 2004 from www.energystar.gov

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (2004c). EPA's WasteWise: Preserving Resources, Preventing Waste. Retrieved Feb. 24, 2004. from www.epa.gov/wastewise/index.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (2004d). San Francisco Area Green Business Program. Retrieved Feb. 24, 2004 from www.epa.gov/region9/cross_pr/innovations/gbp.html

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. EPA (2004e). EPA's Project XL Program. Retrieved Feb. 24, 2004 from www.epa.gov/ProjectXL

    Google Scholar 

  • Videras, J., & Alberini, A. (2000). The Appeal of Voluntary Environmental Programs: Which Firms Participate and Why? Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(4), 449–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, E., Mazur A., & Bretschneider, S. (2000). Voluntary Behavior by Electric Utilities: Levels of Adoption and Contribution of the Climate Challenge Program to the Reduction of Carbon Dioxide. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(3), 407–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brouhle, K., Griffiths, C., Wolverton, A. (2005). The Use of Voluntary Approaches for Environmental Policymaking in the U.S.. In: Croci, E. (eds) The Handbook of Environmental Voluntary Agreements. Environment & Policy, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3356-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics