Skip to main content

Modeling Effects of Emotion and Personality on Political Decision-Making

  • Chapter
Programming for Peace

Part of the book series: Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation ((AGDN,volume 2))

Abstract

The ability to see the world from another person’s perspective is critical for mutual understanding and conflict prevention and resolution. It allows us to understand others’ subjective perspectives, and to predict, to some extent, their reactions to particular situations or events. This then allows us to identify specific situations or actions which are likely to trigger desirable (or undesirable) behavior, and thereby aid in the prevention and resolution of potential conflicts. A key component of these capabilities is the understanding of the other individuals’ values and motivations, patterns of reasoning, and behavior determined by their personalities, and individual reactions that may occur as a result of specific emotions. This type of understanding in turn necessitates understanding how different emotions and traits influence decision-making, and how these influences may result in specific decision-making styles or biases. This chapter describes a generic methodology for representing the effects of multiple, interacting emotional states and personality traits on decision- making, and an associated computational cognitive architecture which implements this methodology. I present results of an evaluation experiment that demonstrates the architecture’s ability to model individual tactical decision- making and produce observable behavior differences resulting from distinct individual profiles. I then discuss how the methodology and architecture would be extended to model strategic, political decision-making, and how it could support a variety of activities geared towards international conflict prevention and resolution. I conclude with specific theoretical and pragmatic challenges associated with this approach to computer-aided conflict prevention and resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ajzen, I., 2001, Nature and operation of attitudes, Annual Review of Psychology 55:27–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M., 2000, Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: reasoned and automatic processes, in European Review of Social Psychology, Stroebe, W., . Hew-stone, M., eds., Wiley, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., 1988, Attitudes, Personality and Behavior Dorsey Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaney, P. H., 1986, Affect and memory, Psychological Bulletin 99:229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H., 1981, Mood and memory, American Psychologist 36:129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breazeal, C., 2003, Emotion and sociable humanoid robots, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59:119–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, J. R., and Townsend, J. T., 1993, Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment, Psychological Review 100:432–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers, J. A., and Salas, E., 1998, Making Decisions Under Stress, Americal Psychological ssociation, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G. L., 1994, Why emotions require cognition, in The Nature of Emotion, Ekman, P., Davidson, R. J. eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. S., 1993, Three paradigms for viewing decision biases, in Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., and Zsambok, C. E., eds., Ablex, Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collyer, S. C., and Malecki, G. S., 1998, Tactical decision making under stress: history and overview, in Making Decisions Under Stress, Cannon-Bowers, J. A., and Salas, E., eds., American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., and McCrae, R. R, 1992, Four ways five factors are basic, Personality & Individual Differences 13: 653–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R., 1994, Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain, Putnam, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R., 2003, Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow and the Feeling Brain, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M., 1995, The nature of human nature: an empirical case for withholding judg-ment-perhaps indefinitely, Political Psychology 16: 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckert, J. C., Entin, E. B., Entin, E. E., MacMillan, J., and Serfaty, D., 1994, Military command decision making expertise, Report 631, Alphatech, Inc., Burlington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edland, A., 1989, On cognitive processes under time stress: A selective review of the literature on time stress and related stress, Reports from the Dept. of Psychology, University of Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endsley, M .R., 1995, Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems, Human Factors 37: 32–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., 1997, Anxiety and Cognition: A Unified Theory. Psychology Press, Hove, E. Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J., 1991, Dimensions of personality: the biosocial approach to personality, in Explorations in temperament, Strelau, J., and Angleitner, A., eds., Plenum, London, pp. 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P., 2003, Affective influences on attitudes and judgments, in Handbook of Affective Sciences, Davidson, R. J., Scherer, K. R., Goldsmith, H. H., eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, K. and Clore, G. L., 2002, Atttending to the big picture: mood and global versus local processing of visual information, Psychological Science 13:34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, A., 1979, Cognitive beliefs and decision-making behavior, in Psychological Models in International Politics, Falkowski, L., ed., Westview Press (Praeger), Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, W. M., and Meehl., P. E., 1996, Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: the clinical-statistical controversy, Psychology, Public Review, and Law 2: 293–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, M. G., 1986, Political Psychology: Contemporary Problems and Issues, Josey-Bass Inc., Publishers, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, M., Unpublished, A Handbook for the Measurement of Leader Personality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., 1991, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, McGraw Hill, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O. R., 1977, The ‘operational code’ as an approach to the analysis of belief systems, Final report to the National Science Foundation, Grant # SC 75-15368, Duke University, Durham, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R., Meyer, J., and Spetzler, C., 2003, Garbage in, garbage out: reducing biases in decision-making. http://www.sdg.com/home.nsf/sdg/eBriefings–eBriefingArchive-Reducing Biases.

  • Hudlicka, E., 2003, Modeling effects of behavior moderators on performance: evaluation of the MAMID methodology and architecture, in Proceedings of BRIMS-12, Phoenix, AZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudlicka, E., 2002, This time with feeling: integrated model of trait and state effects on cognition and behavior, Applied Artificial Intelligence 16: 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudlicka, E., and Pfautz, J., 2002, Once more with feeling: augmenting recognition primed decision making with affective factors, in Proceedings of the 46th meeting of the HFES, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudlicka, E., and Billingsley, J., 1999, Representing behavior moderators in military human performance models, in Proceedings of the 8th CGF-BR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudlicka, E., 1997, Modeling behavior moderators in military HBR models, TR 9716, Psychometrix Associates, Inc., Lincoln, MA. (see also Pew and Mavor, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, M. S., and Revelle, W., 1984, Personality, motivation, & performance, Psych. Review 91:153–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., 1993, Positive affect and decision making, in Handbook of Emotions, Haviland, J. M., and Lewis, M., eds., The Guilford Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I., 1972, Victims of Groupthink, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R., 1992, Political implications of loss aversion, Political Psychology 13: 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R., 1976, Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, B. E., and Isen, A. M., 1993, The influence of positive affect on variety seeking among safe, enjoyable products, Journal of Consumer Research 20:257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A., 1982, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G., 1997, RPD model: looking back, looking forward, in Naturalistic Decision Making, Zsambok, C., and Klein, G., eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G., 1996, The effects of acute stressors on decision making, in Stress and Human Performance, Driskell, J. E., and Salas, E., Eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R. J., and Ketellar, T., 1991, Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative affect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61:132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. E., 1992, Brain mechanisms of emotion and emotional learning, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2: 191–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. E., 1996, The Emotional Brain, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, V., 1977, The Structure of Awareness: Toward a Symbolic Language of Human Reflection, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leites, N., 1951, The Operational Code of the Politburo, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, I. O., Hoffman, B., Arquilla, J., Ronfeldt, D., Zanini, M., 1999, Countering the new terrorism, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J. S., 2003, Political psychology and foreign policy, in Handbook of Political Psychology, Sears, D. O., Huddy, L., Jervis, R., eds., Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisetti, C. L., and Gmytrasiewicz, P., 2002, Can a rational agent afford to be affectless? Applied Artificial Intelligence 16: 577–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G., and Lerner, J. S., 2003, The role of affect in decision making, in Handbook of Affective Sciences, Davidson, R. J., Scherer, K. R., Goldsmith, H. H., eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G., Derryberry, D., and Siegle, G. J., 2000, Personality and emotion: cognitive science perspectives, in Advances in personality psychology, Hampson, S. E., ed., Vol. 1, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G., and Dreary, I. J., 1998, Personality Traits, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., and Roberts, R., 2002, Emotional Intelligence: Science and Myth, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C. and Hagan, R., 1992, Individual differences in the selective processing of threatening information, Behav. Res. Ther. 30: 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E., 1954, Clinical vs. Statistical Prediction, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., Cooke, A. D. J., 1998, Judgment and decision making, Annual Review of Psychology 49: 447–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, R. R., and Reidel, S. K., 1988, Effects of expertise and cognitive style on information use in tactical decision making, US ARI Report 806, US Army Research Institute, Alexandria, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mineka, S., and Sutton, S. K., 1992, Cognitive biases and emotional disorders, Psychological Science, 3: 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M., 2004 , The Emotion Machine. (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R., 1991, Analysis and Conflict, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier, R. W., and Gershenfeld, M. K., 1993, Groups: Theory and Experience, Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orasanu, J., 1998, Stress and naturalistic decision making: strengthening the weak links, in Decision Making Under Stress: Emerging Themes and Applications, Flin, R., Salas, E., eds., Avebury, Aldersho, Hants, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J., 1986, Fusion, propagation, and structuring in belief networks, Artificial Intelligence 29: 241–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persons, J. B. and Foa, E. B., 1984, Processing of fearful and neutral information by obsessivecompulsives, Behavior Res. Ther. 22: 260–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew, R. W. and Mavor, A. S., 1998, Representing Human Behavior in Military Simulations, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J., and Shaw, E., 1999, Review of commander information and interaction profile: recommendations for operationalization, Political Psychology Associates, Ltd., Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J., 1999, Hussein of Iraq: a political psychology profile, Political Psychology 13(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, W., 1995, Personality processes, Annual Review of Psychology 46: 295–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K., 1993, Studying the emotion-antecedent appraisal process. Cognition and Emotion, 7:325-355

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H., 1985, Human nature in politics: the dialogue of psychology with political science, American Political Science Review 79: 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H., 1967, Motivational and emotional controls of cognition , Psychological Review 74 :29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, A., 2000, Architectural requirements for human-like agents both natural and artificial, in Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology, Dautenhan, K., ed., John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., and Kirby, L. D., 2001, On the Elicitation, differentiation, and organization of emotions, TR FS-01-02, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streufert, S., and Streufert, S. C., 1981, Stress and information search in complex decision making: effects of load and time urgency, Technical Report 4, Office of Naval Research, Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P. E., 1992, Good judgment in international politics: three psychological perspectives, Political Psychology 13: 517–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and Kahneman, B., 1981, The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice, Science 211:453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and Kahneman, B., 1974, Judgments under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Science 185: 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, J. D., 1998, Modeling emotion-based decision-making, in Proceedings of “Emotional and Intelligent: The Tangled Knot of Cognition”, AAAI Fall Symposium Series, TR FS-98-03, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertzberger, Y., 1990, The World in Their Minds, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. G., 1995, Psychodynamic processes and framing effects in foreign policy decision-making: Woodrow Wilson’s operational code, Political Psychology 16: 697–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., and Mathews, A., 1997, Cognitive Psychology and Emotional Disorders, John Wiley, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsambok, C. E., 1997, Naturalistic decision making: where are we now? in Naturalistic Decision Making, Zsambok, C. E., and Klein, G. K., eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsambok, C. and Klein, G. A., eds., 1997, Naturalist Decision Making, Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hudlicka, E. (2006). Modeling Effects of Emotion and Personality on Political Decision-Making. In: Trappl, R. (eds) Programming for Peace. Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4390-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics